- Messages
- 1,066
- Likes
- 4,766
Fair point and I am certainly not knowledgeable enough to critique his offense. My understanding of the terminology criticism is that if it is wordy and slows down install or limits understanding on the part of the players, the scaling back point you raise limits the offense and what they are capable of reliably calling. It isn’t that he can’t do it, it’s the impact that would have on play calling and execution.I just never understand why fans have this overinflated sense of football knowledge to pretend they have any idea how good or bad coordinators are beyond “Offense could move ball good so OC good”
I don’t buy the “complicated terminology” thing because if that’s the case how does he get to the D1 level? Any OC worth his salt will scale things based on what the QB and the offense will grasp. You don’t get to that level without being able to do that.
He may very well be an awful OC, but most of us aren’t knowledgeable enough about football to know that and none of us are familiar enough with Rhule and Satterfields conversations to know how relevant his past stints will be next year anyways.
Bud Elliot has raked Satterfield over the coals twice now on Cover 3 and I don’t think it’s unreasonable to discuss the merits (or not) of his criticisms.