- Messages
- 5,510
- Likes
- 25,283
@aztonick you bitch-sounding, mouth-breather, learn your place as being irrelevant.Looks like everyone's favorite stalker is at again. Saw this on a FSU fan page....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!@aztonick you bitch-sounding, mouth-breather, learn your place as being irrelevant.Looks like everyone's favorite stalker is at again. Saw this on a FSU fan page....
Oregon could get screwed here.
Not believing anything until we get confirmation from @SirYachtLooks like everyone's favorite stalker is at again. Saw this on a FSU fan page....
Not believing anything until we get confirmation from @SirYacht
They won't get offered unless Fox pays more or allows Cal and Stanford to join
I don't think this is entirely true. Several sources reported after the media deal that the contract includes provisions and caveats for expansion. I imagine that mean the pie increases based on a pre-determined formula or method if new schools are added, or perhaps expansion requires renegotiation. It would be malpractice for the B1G's attorneys to not include such a provision knowing expansion was a very real option. I think the reason UO and UW aren't considered value adds is because at an average rate of on-field performance, they do not bring viewership much higher than the average B1G school. Sure they brought solid viewership last year when both teams were really good, but the B1G and the media companies are going to try to evaluate value teams apart from just performance because as we all know, all it takes is one bad coach to shipwreck a high performing program. So the question might be, if UO and UW are 6-7 win teams in the B1G, would they still increase the value of the average B1G broadcast. Sounds like that answer might be "no." Admittedly, this is my speculation, but I think that is what most are doing right now.the reason there is no additional revenue for Oregon and Washington is that the media contracts are done now. There would not be a payout increase until the next contract is negotiated., The current deal runs through the 2029 season. So he is saying the Presidents' view is "why should we give a gift to the media companies that cuts our per school share until 2030?"
The Presidents were willing to do that if Cal and Stanford came in as werll because that adds economic benefit to the academic side. Media prfefers just UW an UO because that creates a net larger windfall for them.
The Commissioner, of course, reports to the Presidents.
Alright I need to defend Sir Yacht's honor here.Not believing anything until we get confirmation from @SirYacht
It sucks to realize that your only option is taking a last call girl home from the bar, but you either accept it and get laid or go home and cryWhat a shit position to be in if you're Oregon and Washington. You have to act like the "offer needs to be right" but in reality you're sitting there begging for an invitation and you have zero leverage.
You either settle or head home and tearjerkIt sucks to realize that your only option is taking a last call girl home from the bar, but you either accept it and get laid or go home and cry
you might be right, but if there is one, UO and UW won't move the needle. Back when the B1G took the two LA schools the PNW schools wanted in and it went nowhere - because it would have diluted the B1G member media shares. Nothing significant has changed. If there is such a clause my guess is ND is the only one that moves the needle and adds to revenue in a way the increases membership shares.I don't think this is entirely true. Several sources reported after the media deal that the contract includes provisions and caveats for expansion. I imagine that mean the pie increases based on a pre-determined formula or method if new schools are added, or perhaps expansion requires renegotiation. It would be malpractice for the B1G's attorneys to not include such a provision knowing expansion was a very real option. I think the reason UO and UW aren't considered value adds is because at an average rate of on-field performance, they do not bring viewership much higher than the average B1G school. Sure they brought solid viewership last year when both teams were really good, but the B1G and the media companies are going to try to evaluate value teams apart from just performance because as we all know, all it takes is one bad coach to shipwreck a high performing program. So the question might be, if UO and UW are 6-7 win teams in the B1G, would they still increase the value of the average B1G broadcast. Sounds like that answer might be "no." Admittedly, this is my speculation, but I think that is what most are doing right now.
you might be right, but if there is one, UO and UW won't move the needle. Back when the B1G took the two LA schools the PNW schools wanted in and it went nowhere - because it would have diluted the B1G member media shares. Nothing significant has changed. If there is such a clause my guess is ND is the only one that moves the needle and adds to revenue in a way the increases membership shares.
Hilarious for the Pac-12 to think they can settle the waters by touting this Apple deal.The timeline sure seems like the B1G wasn’t willing to negotiate. Everything was positive. B1G told them what they could offer. Then the report about Wash/OR wanting more money. Literally the last reporting before “momentum had turned against expansion.“
it’s going to be amazing if all of these schools end up signing a GOR today for a tv deal that every bit of reporting said they were in chaos over earlier this week.
And apple gave them a deadline of today, just to turn the screws a little more! What a time to be alive.Hilarious for the Pac-12 to think they can settle the waters by touting this Apple deal.