- Messages
- 4,997
- Likes
- 37,405
We were so bad at Zone schemes....especially early in the year
I can't express how much I hate this clip, hate the technique, and hate the scheme...fuck. Get some vertical displacement.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!
We were so bad at Zone schemes....especially early in the year
Like watch that... Then watch....
Not same play but look at the difference in combo blocks. Fuck I don't think Austin cared about getting 1st level combos
Like watch that... Then watch....
Not same play but look at the difference in combo blocks. Fuck I don't think Austin cared about getting 1st level combos
Dont show that to NFL scouts. RSS told me he’s a 2nd/3rd rounder
He is a physical freak, but he has so much more room to grow.Dont show that to NFL scouts. RSS told me he’s a 2nd/3rd rounder
Will test off the charts at the Combine he hasn’t been invited too yet
Zone scheme, he's looking to jack block the 3 and climb to the point.
So did I basically draw up a tight zone?Zone scheme, he's looking to jack block the 3 and climb to the point.
Part of the reason I don't like track blocking.
Cam's got a 1 tech on the backside. Which presents an immediate problem of potential penetration if the BSG can't get his backside knee through the crotch of the 1 tech. If you're running more of a wide track zone, then you don't have to worry so much about the 1 tech backide, just rip reach and cut him off. But in all honesty, this looks a little more like Duo because of Piper. Because if it's zone scheme, he's got to get his backside leg through the crotch of the 1 tech, and he's not anywhere close to that. So it's either pathetic, or it's Duo...and I want to refuse it's that pathetic and they're trying to create that wall, back read the +1 the point and cut.
My preference personally is running tight zone, shoulders square, vertical displacement, where Cam is uncovered playside, so he's going to execute a hip block and climb to his point. It puts the PSG on the 3 tech basically one on one, but those are the decisions you make to take care of certain things up front. More than likely you're bending this back to the backside A-B range anyways.
I wouldn't consider that tight zone. Tight Zone to me is if you're uncovered, you help your backside teammate unless your the EMOL front side.So did I basically draw up a tight zone?
Do you always track block inside zone?
Lets be fucking honest. The only OG I think that has a shot at making that block is Nouili and even I wouldn't bet on it. I don't get why your scheme in this situation would have Cam fucking running after a 3 tech when you have a 1 tech? Any 1 tech who is 600lbs is blowing up this play more times than not.
That makes more sense. You can tell the back was quick to get going to the left too. Now I don't like how you basically are funneling your RB to a free hitter. So does the TE (87) need to get more horizontal to cut off the DE?Your last point is another reason I think it's Duo, if it's Duo, the playside is to the left, and everyone blocks gap away, more resembling down blocks.
So would you haveI wouldn't consider that tight zone. Tight Zone to me is if you're uncovered, you help your backside teammate unless your the EMOL front side.
87: is blocking the C gap by rule. He's got a hard job, but essentially, he's work to get his left knee into the crotch of the DE or he's going to wash him down if he crosses face. He could arc to the D gap player to influence the DE.That makes more sense. You can tell the back was quick to get going to the left too. Now I don't like how you basically are funneling your RB to a free hitter. So does the TE (87) need to get more horizontal to cut off the DE?
So would you have
87 - hard horizontal step
LT - Check to make sure the 6 tech doesn't spike the go get that LB
LG/C - Combo to the LB
Front side is pretty much straight up.
Kind of a free hitter, but it's the RB's job to cut off of the play side inside LB. If the LB plus, you bounce, if the LB scrapes, you penetrate to hit space backside. To me, that's why it looks a lot like zone. But the RB's read is dramatically different than in zone plays.That makes more sense. You can tell the back was quick to get going to the left too. Now I don't like how you basically are funneling your RB to a free hitter. So does the TE (87) need to get more horizontal to cut off the DE?