- Messages
- 28,815
- Likes
- 68,261
Incorrect*So .500 != C
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!Incorrect*So .500 != C
Thanks. Did not know that.
Incorrect*
I'm old.
You're free to have your opinion.
Even without the troll and tard votes it still seems like a pretty generous average. Tbh, should classify anything above a D+ as a retard vote and not factor it in.Mean: C
Median: C
Mode: C-
Threw out the A+ (troll) and the A- (tard)
Didn't you predict a 4-8 record?Even without the troll and tard votes it still seems like a pretty generous average. Tbh, should classify anything above a D+ as a retard vote and not factor it in.
5-7 or 6-6 iircDidn't you predict a 4-8 record?
I was torn between D+ and C-Even without the troll and tard votes it still seems like a pretty generous average. Tbh, should classify anything above a D+ as a retard vote and not factor it in.
So at worst they met your expectations. Maybe exceeded.5-7 or 6-6 iirc
Choca brother, I know you’re having a tough time with elections this month, but you must respect the votes of the people and the votes of tPB’ers, even (especially) if they’re different from your beliefs! Get back to persuasion, not name calling!Even without the troll and tard votes it still seems like a pretty generous average. Tbh, should classify anything above a D+ as a retard vote and not factor it in.
Be petty, seriously. I felt like anything from 4-7 wins was possible. Don't remember if the opto propaganda got me to vote for 6+ wins or not.So at worst they met your expectations. Maybe exceeded.
Pretty sure it was 4-8 but not petty enough to go find it.
Let's just go with your anywhere from 4-7 was possible. They ended up winning 6 which is the high range of possible. Yet you're grading at below average.Be petty, seriously. I felt like anything from 4-7 wins was possible. Don't remember if the opto propaganda got me to vote for 6+ wins or not.
I will not respect the vote of any light in the loafers husker fan that thinks a six win season is worth anything more than a D+ grade.Choca brother, I know you’re having a tough time with elections this month, but you must respect the votes of the people and the votes of tPB’ers, even (especially) if they’re different from your beliefs! Get back to persuasion, not name calling!
You can't be serious with thisLet's just go with your anywhere from 4-7 was possible. They ended up winning 6 which is the high range of possible. Yet you're grading at below average.
I think it’s about being realistic about where the program is/has been. If you accept the fact that we’ve been in the absolute bottom shit tier basement of the P4 for the past 8 years, then I think you should view this season as basically positive.You can't be serious with this
Because the team met Choc's low expectations, he needs to rate Rhule as having performed average or better?
Just trying to understand his ranking based on his expectations. If they reached rhe top end of his expectations they get a C? So they have to out perform his expectations to get a B?You can't be serious with this
Because the team met Choc's low expectations, he needs to rate Rhule as having performed average or better?
It's a grade on overall performance, not performance relative to expectationsJust trying to understand his ranking based on his expectations. If they reached rhe top end of his expectations they get a C? So they have to out perform his expectations to get a B?
I graded a C. They didn't under perform they didn't over perform.
My expectation factored in the shitty assistants and the lack of progress observed in Rhule's first year. We had the talent to win 9 games but we didn't. Rhule has underachieved bigly.Just trying to understand his ranking based on his expectations. If they reached rhe top end of his expectations they get a C? So they have to out perform his expectations to get a B?
I graded a C. They didn't under perform they didn't over perform.