Breaking Former Nebraska women's basketball player Ashley Scoggin files lawsuit against school

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.
What was the deal with the team meeting in the first place? That's the weirdest thing. Tell Turd, and say they're both are suspended until we figure this out back in Lincoln. And that's that. What a strange move to have some type of council with the players.
I'm guessing it was absolute chaos there for the team and Amy felt she had to do something to address the situation before they played a game.
 
I'm going to go ahead and guess that maybe Scroggins' story isn't entirely factual given the statement by the University of Nebraska. You usually don't use that kind of language unless you think you've got a good case.

“The University was made aware of the lawsuit this morning. While the University does not comment on the specifics of pending litigation, it does not agree with the allegations contained in the Complaint and intends to vigorously defend this matter.”
 
From what I know...the events in the suit are facts.

@nja13 any chance you can c/p that lawsuit here...link not working for me
It's super long, but I can paste some excerpts:

In the summer of 2021, ASHLEY secured an academic internship with the University ofNebraska Department of Athletics. ASHLEY was interested in becoming a coach when shefinished her playing eligibility, and an internship at which she could learn about the coaching roleand coaching leadership would be helpful in that goal.

29. In the first week of ASHLEY’s internship, she was given a table in a conference room for workspace. Toward the end of that week, LOVE approached ASHLEY and invited her to do herwork at a small table in his office. ASHLEY accepted the invitation, and mostly worked inLOVE’s office throughout the rest of her internship.

30. Working in LOVE’s office resulted in LOVE spending much more time around ASHLEY,one-on-one. He asked her about her long-distance romantic relationship, her dreams andaspirations to work as a coach, what kind of alcohol she liked and other personal matters.ASHLEY enjoyed what, at the time, she felt as a burgeoning familiarity and friendship withsomeone who could mentor her as an athlete and a future coach.

LOVE GROOMS ASHLEY FOR A SECRET SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP

31. LOVE began to ask ASHLEY to go out for drinks with him. He advised her that otherplayers on the Cornhusker women’s team had gone out for drinks with him, and now, he said, itwas “your turn.”

32. LOVE also began messaging ASHLEY directly through SnapChat. This includedcontacting her late at night and asking her to meet him for drinks. Sometimes LOVE would tellher that he was out drinking with WILLIAMS’ husband and he would invite ASHLEY to jointhem. ASHLEY did not accept the first several invitations to meet LOVE for drinks.

33. When ASHLEY eventually did accept one of LOVE’s SnapChat invitations, they met inthe parking lot of a Costco, after midnight. LOVE told ASHLEY he had just left the bars. They sat in the car and talked. LOVE chided ASHLEY about not bringing alcohol and asking her, “ifI leave for a different school, will you come with me?”

34. A few days later, LOVE invited ASHLEY to meet him and WILLIAMS’ husband for drinks;she declined. LOVE then asked ASHLEY to meet just him. They again met very late at nightat the Costo parking lot. This time, ASHLEY brought alcohol as LOVE had suggested. LOVEkissed ASHLEY and asked her, “have you ever done anything with a coach before?”

35. This interaction left ASHLEY feeling confused and trapped. LOVE had already offeredand given her mentoring, individual practice sessions, academic coaching, and the implied promiseof support of her career. It was now undeniable that LOVE wanted a sexual relationship.

36. ASHLEY was also afraid that if she reported LOVE, WILLIAMS would retaliate againsther. She was aware of LOVE and WILLIAMS’ close relationship, and LOVE’s importance toWILLIAMS on her coaching staff. In her time on the Cornhusker women’s basketball team,ASHLEY had observed WILLIAMS to lose her temper unpredictably, to insert herself arbitrarilyinto seemingly minor personality conflicts amongst team members, and to otherwise demonstrateloose boundaries.

37. ASHLEY did not feel that she could tell anyone that LOVE had kissed her or of hisinappropriate comments to her. LOVE was sharing with ASHLEY information that would not ordinarily be shared with players, such as discussions and even disagreements he had withWILLIAMS over game strategy and personnel decisions. LOVE, acting in the course and scopeof his employment and under color of state law, created the perception for ASHLEY that he could“make her or break her” in terms of her participation on the women’s basketball team and herfuture.

THE SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL COACH AND STUDENT-ATHLETE

38. The relationship turned sexual. When LOVE wanted to have sex, he expected ASHLEYto be available and willing. Because LOVE was married and ASHLEY did not live alone, thisinvolved sexual relations in different locations in University of Nebraska Department of Athleticsfacilities. It also included summoning ASHLEY to his hotel room when the team traveled to roadgames.

39. ASHLEY was a keeper of this secret, making excuses when she would have to leave a roomor a gathering because LOVE had summoned her to meet him for sex. LOVE expected her tobecome available whenever he texted or messaged her.

40. ASHLEY believed, correctly, that others were aware of something inappropriate going onbetween her and LOVE. She did not know how to stop the situation. She continued to fear thatWILLIAMS would blame ASHLEY for WILLIAMS’ Associate Head Coach initiating thisrelationship. She feared that WILLIAMS would retaliate against her. She was also concerned that WILLIAMS’ husband, who was a personal friend of LOVE, was posting suggestive emojis on ASHLEY’s social media account.

41. LOVE began to pressure ASHLEY to participate in a sexual “threesome” with him and anundisclosed second man. She refused. After she refused, ASHLEY felt like she was given lessplaying time during games.

FEBRUARY 17, 2022: THE SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP IS CONFIRMED

42. The team traveled to State College, Pennsylvania to play Penn State on February 17, 2022.

43. On the night before the game, members of the team and practice players created a ruse tosuccessfully confirm and record on video ASHLEY’s presence in LOVE’s hotel room. This ruseincluded a practice player falsely representing himself as LOVE to a desk clerk in order to obtainLOVE’s room key; it ended in two team members confronting ASHLEY in LOVE’s room. Theyreported their findings and showed their video recording to WILLIAMS. LOVE instructedASHLEY to deny anything improper, and he told her that he would talk to WILLIAMS.WILLIAMS PUNISHES ASHLEY FOR LOVE’S ABUSE OF POWER

44. Upon receiving this report, WILLIAMS took no measures to protect ASHLEY’sconfidentiality or to advise ASHLEY of her rights. She took no measures to meaningfully explorewhether what had been reported to her was the result of an abuse of power, ethics and status by LOVE. She did not exercise leadership to address the emotionality of the situation, theconfrontation that was reported to her, or the likelihood that her student-athlete was sexuallyexploited by her Associate Head Coach.

45. The next day, WILLIAMS called a team meeting before the game. At the meeting (whichlasted multiple hours), WILLIAMS invited the team members to interrogate both ASHLEY andLOVE. With WILLIAMS’ encouragement, the team members assailed ASHLEY, screaming andcrying and using profanity. Both ASHLEY and LOVE denied anything improper. The teammembers then accused ASHLEY of lying. ASHLEY felt panicked, trapped and profoundlyashamed. She could not, in that setting with LOVE inches away and watching her, admit thetruth of what had been happening.

46. WILLIAMS cast ASHLEY in the role of a seducer and a liar. She allowed the players toberate and accuse ASHLEY for hours. She did not redirect or counsel the players that what theyhad seen may be the result of an abuse of power by her Associate Head Coach.

47. WILLIAMS told the group that she would allow the team to decide how to handle thesituation. Following the emotionality of the team, WILLIAMS suspended ASHLEY from theteam and suspended LOVE with pay.

48. After the meeting but while they were still in Pennsylvania, one of ASHLEY’s teammatestold ASHLEY “if you ever say anything, [LOVE] loses his job." .LOVE contacted ASHLEY and urged her to claim that she was mentally ill.
 
Here's the part concerning Turd Alberts. I think it's important to note that no one is alleging Turd knew about the affair or helped cover it up. All his invovlement mentioend in the suit is after the fact:

NU AND ALBERTS RATIFY WILLIAMS’ PUNISHMENT OF ASHLEY

50. ASHLEY traveled back to Lincoln with the team, though without any offers of or actualsupport. The next day, a member of the administration of the Department of Athletics told ASHLEY that she could, if she wished, talk with a “resource lady” in the “Resource Department.” ASHLEY was not informed of her rights under Title IX at that time. WILLIAMS met with ASHLEY that day, together with other members of the administration of the Department of Athletics, and confirmed to ASHLEY that she was removed from the team.

51. Nebraska sports media soon learned that WILLIAMS had removed ASHLEY from theteam and had, at the same time, suspended LOVE with pay. WILLIAMS’ decision was publishedin statewide and, eventually, national media. The humiliation and shaming for ASHLEY fromthe reporting of this non-coincidence of events has endured. At the same time, NU, WILLIAMS and ALBERTS were aware of the media attention and speculation that these events wereprecipitated by an improper sexual relationship. NU, WILLIAMS and ALBERTS were motivatedto avoid scandal and embarrassment to the Cornhusker women’s basketball program, instead ofbeing motivated to protect its student-athlete, ASHLEY. NU, WILLIAMS and ALBERTSallowed the speculation and perception to fester that ASHLEY was “equally to blame” or otherwisehad done something improper, when they should have sent a clear message that it is alwaysimproper for a professional coach to pursue a sexual relationship with a student-athlete. ASHLEY advised her parents of her removal from the team. She was still afraid andashamed to disclose LOVE’s relationship with her, but she advised her parents that her removalwas based on suspicion of a sexual relationship with LOVE. Her parents traveled from Oregon toLincoln to accompany ASHLEY to a scheduled meeting of ALBERTS, WILLIAMS, and two otheradministrators of the Department of Athletics.

53. At that meeting, ALBERTS was unfamiliar with ASHLEY’s history with the women’sbasketball team and her performance over the preceding two seasons. He endorsed WILLIAMS’claims that ASHLEY was removed for dishonesty.

54. ALBERTS did not redirect or correct WILLIAMS. He did not advise ASHLEY that if theAssociate Head Coach had pursued a sexual relationship with her, then that was an abuse of powerand ethics. ALBERTS never acknowledged that coaches must not pursue sexual relationshipswith student-athletes. There was no discussion of whether LOVE had done anything wrong suchthat ASHLEY ended up in LOVE’s hotel room. Per ALBERTS and WILLIAMS, ASHLEY was aliar who deserved to be punished.55.ASHLEY’s parents asked what rule ASHLEY had broken, to warrant her removal from theteam. WILLIAMS answered that ASHLEY lied and that is why she was removed. WILLIAMSthen began to cry.

56. By that time, ASHLEY and LOVE still had not admitted that the suspicions of a sexualrelationship were well-founded. ASHLEY was too frightened and ashamed. WILLIAMS wascorrect in assessing that ASHLEY was concealing the sexual relationship, but she chose to punishASHLEY rather than acknowledge that this could not have happened if her Associate Head Coachhad not abused his position on her coaching staff.

57. ALBERTS was polite and courteous, but he did not exercise leadership over this situation. He told ASHLEY and her parents that WILLIAMS could decide who she wanted on her team.

58. This was the equivalent of WILLIAMS giving ALBERTS a layup: by allowing WILLIAMSto punish ASHLEY for LOVE’s abuse of power, ALBERTS was able to quiet the chatter and mediacoverage of LOVE’s and ASHLEY’s removal from the team, and to refocus attention on the team’sperformance, recruiting and other Department of Athletics matters.THE DAMAGE DONE59.ALBERTS and WILLIAMS maintained LOVE on paid suspension for the remainder of thesemester.

60. There was no discipline for the practice squad member who had dishonestly posed as LOVEto illicitly obtain a key to LOVE’s room from the hotel desk clerk in State College, Pennsylvania.ALBERTS and the University of Nebraska did not investigate whether WILLIAMS knew that herplayers and a practice squad member were running a caper to confirm ASHLEY’s presence in LOVE’s hotel room, or why the players ran this caper rather than communicate with WILLIAMS about their concerns.

61. ALBERTS did not order an investigation of the situation. Until Ashley brought a Title IXcomplaint on March 11, 2022, there was no formal investigation into the events in State College.Nor was there a formal investigation of what events led up to the players confronting ASHLEY inLOVE’s hotel room. Nor was there a formal investigation of WILLIAMS’ conduct after theplayers reported to her ASHLEY’s presence in LOVE’s hotel room.

62. LOVE remained on the payroll of the University of Nebraska until May 13, 2022, when heresigned. After receipt of his resignation, the Title IX Coordinator advised ASHLEY that theyhad dismissed ASHLEY’s Title IX complaint without completing the pending investigation. TheDepartment of Athletics did not conduct its own investigation of how an Associate Head Coachwas able to initiate a sexual relationship with a student-athlete, or of how WILLIAMS addressedthe situation on and after February 17, 2022.

63. ASHLEY lost her housing, because she shared an apartment with a teammate. TheUniversity gave her options of either moving into an on-campus apartment with multipleroommates she didn’t know, or else paying on her own for a more expensive single room.64.ASHLEY asked her professors to let her complete the semester online, because she was notcomfortable attending class in person due to media coverage of her removal from the team and the prospect of encountering people associated with the team. Most professors agreed; one refused,until after ASHLEY had filed a Title IX complaint. This added to ASHLEY’s extreme stress.

65. ASHLEY also lost access to physical therapy/training assistance that she had been receivingas a member of the basketball team. When she began work on transferring to another program,she discovered that access to her game film had been disabled, and she had to ask that this accessbe restored so that other programs could review her game film.

66. Meanwhile, sports media had extensively reported ASHLEY’s removal from the team andthe not-coincidental timing of LOVE’s paid suspension. A reasonable coach at another programwould question whether to recruit ASHLEY to their team in light of this coverage.

67. While NU persuaded the last professor to allow ASHLEY to complete her semester onlineand eventually restored her access to her game film, it did not correct her removal from theCornhusker women’s basketball team, nor did it correct her punishment for concealing the sexualrelationship that grew from LOVE’s abuse of his authority. This damage is done.68.The University of Nebraska continued to identify LOVE as Associate Head Coach of thewomen’s basketball team on the website of the Department of Athletics for nearly a year thereafter. ASHLEY transferred from Nebraska.
 
Reading

The WILLIAMS HUSBAND aspect is odd to me.

For the first meet LOVE wanted her to meet them both at the Costco.

Interesting... Two Hot Dogs and Sodas for $1.79 that night?
The suit doesn't say anyting about Williams husband being involved in the Costco meet up. It says Love and Mr. Williams were out at a bar and Love invited Scoggin to come out. She declined.
The Costco meet up came later and in fact the suit specifically mentions that the Costco meetup would just be with Love.
 
I'm guessing it was absolute chaos there for the team and Amy felt she had to do something to address the situation before they played a game.
from what I know, the team told Amy they would NOT PLAY if Ashley and Love were on the bench. Amy had to do something, in her mind she must have thought (speculation) having a team meeting and allowing the team to decide what to do was in the best interest of the team. We have to remember, this is the year WBB went to the NCAA tourney...Amy wasn't about to fuck that up...instead she may have put herself in a position to lose her job.

First thing she SHOULD HAVE done, imho, is call Turd and get advice. By allowing the team to decide, if I'm right, rather than getting the "higher ups" involved could ultimately be the sword she falls on.
 
Multiple things are true at once. I agree with your points.

The problem is the player/coach dynamic. He holds power over her. It violates the integrity of that relationship. He knows better. As a coach, it is gross negligence.

If he was screwing a 21 year old Nebraska coed that he didn’t coach, fine.

That is not the case here. It’s wrong on every level.
Well, she has a pussy, so I argue who really has the power. 😉
 
"Following the emotionality of the team, Williams suspended..."

Never heard the word "emotionality" before. Not saying that's bad grammar/writing, just seems like an odd phrase
Can we use 'ality' of words in a sentence perhaps to better understand?

@Jim14510 gay'ality' is a problem here on tPB according to some.

@ThomOsborneMD has an issue with his old'ality' when posting on the tPB.

Yeah, it's weird.
 
It's bad writing, because we already know they're women, so it's redundant.
Schitts Creek Lol GIF by CBC
 
Back
Top