#2ndChoice to Wisconsin Confirmed | Page 10 | The Platinum Board

#2ndChoice to Wisconsin Confirmed

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

#2ndChoice to Wisconsin Confirmed

God damn. Been out all day and just saw this. We could have had #2ndChoice?
 
Officially official on 247

https://247sports.com/Article/Luke-...hris-McIntosh-Paul-Chryst-coaching-198825686/
 
The only thing with Leonahrd..... I don't like the 3-4 derfense much. Would much prefer to be in 4-3 base.
 
The only thing with Leonahrd..... I don't like the 3-4 derfense much. Would much prefer to be in 4-3 base.
I know I’m in the minority but I like the 3-4 more if we are capable recruiting to it. It’s easier to disguise I think. If Leonhard would come I would definitely take him for multiple reasons.
 
I know I’m in the minority but I like the 3-4 more if we are capable recruiting to it. It’s easier to disguise I think. If Leonhard would come I would definitely take him for multiple reasons.

We'd need 3 stud interior DL to successfully run the 3-4. I prefer a 4-3 with two good D End's bringing pressure consistently. I think trying to go multiple with LB's playing so many different positions/style is tough to pull off. Just my 2 cents.
 
We'd need 3 stud interior DL to successfully run the 3-4. I prefer a 4-3 with two good D End's bringing pressure consistently. I think trying to go multiple with LB's playing so many different positionsstyle is tough to pull off. Just my 2 cents.
Like I said it depends if you can recruit to it. There is no right or wrong answer. When we have ran the 3-4 our recruiting has sucked.
 
We'd need 3 stud interior DL to successfully run the 3-4. I prefer a 4-3 with two good D End's bringing pressure consistently. I think trying to go multiple with LB's playing so many different positions/style is tough to pull off. Just my 2 cents.
If you hire the best recruiting DL coach in the country, that might help with the interior DL talent…
 
We'd need 3 stud interior DL to successfully run the 3-4. I prefer a 4-3 with two good D End's bringing pressure consistently. I think trying to go multiple with LB's playing so many different positions/style is tough to pull off. Just my 2 cents.
Shame. Had 2 of those types of guys at Nebraska now starting for Oregon
 
Like I said it depends if you can recruit to it. There is no right or wrong answer. When we have ran the 3-4 our recruiting has sucked.

If you hire the best recruiting DL coach in the country, that might help with the interior DL talent…

Even considering those things, I still simply prefer the 4-3 over 3-4. 3-4 you also have to have stud LB's who can play multiple. I mean, if you have a bunch of great players, any defensive style will work. I'd prefer to play 4-3 with great players than 3-4 with great players. Just my preference. And I think Rhule prefers the 4-3 also.

But if we go out and pay Leonarhd 2 mil or whatever to be our DC, don't think it means his 3-4 is doomed. Great coaches can also make their system work, and work well and consistently.
 
Back
Top