June Recruiting Thread

[Dr.DrakeRamoray]

This is why I don’t put to much care or stock into recruiting until signing day anymore, so much can change between now and then it’s just not worth it to be invested in it.

 

[Carm]

Fuck he’s going to Cockeye state

He lives less than ten miles from Cockeye St and grew up with them as his dream school, and they told him he would be the only LB they would take this year, so this will be interesting to watch.

 

[Hedley Lamarr]

He lives less than ten miles from Cockeye St and grew up with them as his dream school, and they told him he would be the only LB they would take this year, so this will be interesting to watch.

Cockeye State has practically no NIL support fwiw. Have a buddy involved and he jokes about how nonexistent it is for them.

 

[Herbie]

He lives less than ten miles from Cockeye St and grew up with them as his dream school, and they told him he would be the only LB they would take this year, so this will be interesting to watch.

 

[Blakejc]

This is why I don’t put to much care or stock into recruiting until signing day anymore, so much can change between now and then it’s just not worth it to be invested in it.

The best part is Sean Callahan getting yelled at by fans when a sure fire recruit picks a different school.

 

[Carm]

Verghese:


Had a feeling this could be a possibility, while in Oregon State for his official visit, Salt Lake City (Uta.) West three-star offensive tackle Brian Tapu committed to the Beavers. Nebraska really did impress last week and I felt confident immediately coming out of the weekend that Nebraska would be the pick. He reached out mid-week to say he was no longer putting a timeline on his decision, reading between the lines on that, I don't think his timeline and Nebraska's lined up. Nebraska wanted more time to evaluate him, while he was ready to lock in a spot. Unfortunate but I don't think this one is done, if Nebraska circles back in the fall with another year of tape on the three-star, he'd be receptive to hearing from the staff.

We have a lot of OL on the roster and are being picky

FYI, Callahan says he has it on "good authority" we wanted him and thought he was committed, but that he had a long-standing relationship with and Oregon St coach that won him over, So a less positive take than Tim's.

 

[Carm]

With House settlement, is clock ticking on college football walk-ons?​

by:Eric Prisbell•about 1 hour•
EricPrisbell

No college football program has a more celebrated walk-on program than Nebraska, which for decades has seen some unexpectedly develop into NFL players while the vast majority were just grateful to be part of the team, even if they never played a down.
Long hailed as the team’s “secret sauce,” its walk-on program is a melting pot of players – from late bloomers to almost-fast-enough or not-quite-big-enough guys – all oozing pride to be a part of the Big Red program that once ruled college football. Nebraska’s roster currently includes 145 players.
Now the Cornhuskers’ model is in peril.
As part of the settlement in the landmark House case, scholarship increases are coming to college sports, but so are roster size limits – including in college football. If U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken certifies the settlement, many fear this will spell the end of walk-ons, an integral part of the tapestry of college football.
Remember the movie “Rudy?” Remember Stetson Bennett? Or how about Baker Mayfield?
The list goes on.
“I think it would be awful,” Nebraska coach Matt Rhule, himself a former walk-on, told SiriusXM College Sports Radio. “For every player that ends up with a high-end commercial, there are 100 players who are becoming better people by having played college football and being part of a team.
“Those are the people who usually end up running our country, running our corporations, running our businesses. We spend all this time talking about what great things college football does … We have unbelievable young men on our team that don’t care if they ever play a snap, they want to do everything they can to help Nebraska. They’re going to change the world someday. And to think we’re going to take that away from them, there’s so many unintended consequences sometimes.”

No program would be impacted more than Nebraska​

The heart of the House settlement entails the NCAA and all 32 Division I conferences paying $2.8 billion in damages and schools, at their discretion, being able to share as much as $22 million annually with athletes. But the tentacles of the agreement reach far and wide, with implications extending to the potential death of the walk-on model to what that means for having enough healthy players late in an increasingly longer season to run adequate practices.
And that’s to say nothing of the challenge for some teams to field respectable squads for non-College Football Playoff bowl games in the age of player opt-outs and the endless churn of the transfer portal.
“It’s scary for all the different walk-ons, the guys who are an inch too short but they make their way and it’s a feel-good story, or all the kickers and punters,” one industry source told On3. “A cost-measuring, a cost-cutting mechanism. It’s sad. It’s awful, and all because people couldn’t figure it out 10, 15 years ago. And there’s still 100 more questions than answers.”
The move to increase scholarships – currently 85 – stems from believing that providing more benefits to athletes will help shield the NCAA and schools from further lawsuits. The move to create a roster limit – a number has yet to be established – stems from cost-cutting at a time when schools face an enormous financial stress test in a post-House settlement world that includes revenue sharing.
Sean Callahan, publisher and owner of HuskerOnline, has covered Nebraska football since 1999 and can rattle off name after name of former Nebraska walk-ons who made the NFL, from fullback Andy Janovich to kicker Alex Henery and many more. Callahan said not enough people are grasping yet what roster limits could mean for the future of walk-ons.
“This will affect Nebraska as much as anybody in college football if they did this, because Nebraska has probably the largest roster of any Power Four conference program right now,” Callahan told On3. “Some of the greatest success stories in the program’s history at Nebraska have been walk-on players that have come in and gone on to have NFL careers.”

Axing walk-ons: ‘Against what college football stands for’​

The potential adverse effect on walk-ons will be exacerbated at Nebraska but felt elsewhere – be it other programs with rich walk-on histories like Cockeye and Wisconsin or far beyond. The issue stirred spirited reaction from SEC coaches at the league’s recent spring meetings.
Oklahoma coach Brent Venables: “We’re going to expand the length of the season, we’re going to play more games, but we’re going to have a smaller roster?”
Texas A&M coach Mike Elko: “I think it’s absolutely against what college football stands for. It’s something that’s really bad for the sport.”
Alabama coach Kalen DeBoer: “There’s a lot that goes into development, there’s a lot that goes into putting together a practice that (makes it) efficient. There’s a health and safety piece, for sure, that comes into play when it comes to roster size.”
If walk-ons as we know them are eliminated, coaches have discussed the possibility of a taxi/practice squad of players who wouldn’t count toward the roster cap. Think along the lines of men who regularly practice against a school’s women’s basketball team.
SEC coaches even pitched to league leadership the possibility that coaches would take money from their own lucrative contracts to pay for walk-ons, according to The Athletic. That option was shot down.
With settlement terms potentially taking effect as early as fall 2025, the clock may be ticking on walk-ons, perhaps one of the enduring vestiges of the sport’s tradition now in peril.
“They can use different terms around it, but they’re getting rid of walk-ons – it’s a major concern,” Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin told Seth Emerson. “Just the locker room culture of having walk-ons, they become friends with the star scholarship players, and they’re in each other’s weddings down the road, and so many of those guys actually have become coaches. That’s part of the fabric of college football.”

 

[2010sarenevercomingback]

With House settlement, is clock ticking on college football walk-ons?​

by:Eric Prisbell•about 1 hour•
EricPrisbell

No college football program has a more celebrated walk-on program than Nebraska, which for decades has seen some unexpectedly develop into NFL players while the vast majority were just grateful to be part of the team, even if they never played a down.
Long hailed as the team’s “secret sauce,” its walk-on program is a melting pot of players – from late bloomers to almost-fast-enough or not-quite-big-enough guys – all oozing pride to be a part of the Big Red program that once ruled college football. Nebraska’s roster currently includes 145 players.
Now the Cornhuskers’ model is in peril.
As part of the settlement in the landmark House case, scholarship increases are coming to college sports, but so are roster size limits – including in college football. If U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken certifies the settlement, many fear this will spell the end of walk-ons, an integral part of the tapestry of college football.
Remember the movie “Rudy?” Remember Stetson Bennett? Or how about Baker Mayfield?
The list goes on.
“I think it would be awful,” Nebraska coach Matt Rhule, himself a former walk-on, told SiriusXM College Sports Radio. “For every player that ends up with a high-end commercial, there are 100 players who are becoming better people by having played college football and being part of a team.
“Those are the people who usually end up running our country, running our corporations, running our businesses. We spend all this time talking about what great things college football does … We have unbelievable young men on our team that don’t care if they ever play a snap, they want to do everything they can to help Nebraska. They’re going to change the world someday. And to think we’re going to take that away from them, there’s so many unintended consequences sometimes.”

No program would be impacted more than Nebraska​

The heart of the House settlement entails the NCAA and all 32 Division I conferences paying $2.8 billion in damages and schools, at their discretion, being able to share as much as $22 million annually with athletes. But the tentacles of the agreement reach far and wide, with implications extending to the potential death of the walk-on model to what that means for having enough healthy players late in an increasingly longer season to run adequate practices.
And that’s to say nothing of the challenge for some teams to field respectable squads for non-College Football Playoff bowl games in the age of player opt-outs and the endless churn of the transfer portal.
“It’s scary for all the different walk-ons, the guys who are an inch too short but they make their way and it’s a feel-good story, or all the kickers and punters,” one industry source told Tater Island. “A cost-measuring, a cost-cutting mechanism. It’s sad. It’s awful, and all because people couldn’t figure it out 10, 15 years ago. And there’s still 100 more questions than answers.”
The move to increase scholarships – currently 85 – stems from believing that providing more benefits to athletes will help shield the NCAA and schools from further lawsuits. The move to create a roster limit – a number has yet to be established – stems from cost-cutting at a time when schools face an enormous financial stress test in a post-House settlement world that includes revenue sharing.
Sean Callahan, publisher and owner of HuskerOnline, has covered Nebraska football since 1999 and can rattle off name after name of former Nebraska walk-ons who made the NFL, from fullback Andy Janovich to kicker Alex Henery and many more. Callahan said not enough people are grasping yet what roster limits could mean for the future of walk-ons.
“This will affect Nebraska as much as anybody in college football if they did this, because Nebraska has probably the largest roster of any Power Four conference program right now,” Callahan told Tater Island. “Some of the greatest success stories in the program’s history at Nebraska have been walk-on players that have come in and gone on to have NFL careers.”

Axing walk-ons: ‘Against what college football stands for’​

The potential adverse effect on walk-ons will be exacerbated at Nebraska but felt elsewhere – be it other programs with rich walk-on histories like Cockeye and Wisconsin or far beyond. The issue stirred spirited reaction from SEC coaches at the league’s recent spring meetings.
Oklahoma coach Brent Venables: “We’re going to expand the length of the season, we’re going to play more games, but we’re going to have a smaller roster?”
Texas A&M coach Mike Elko: “I think it’s absolutely against what college football stands for. It’s something that’s really bad for the sport.”
Alabama coach Kalen DeBoer: “There’s a lot that goes into development, there’s a lot that goes into putting together a practice that (makes it) efficient. There’s a health and safety piece, for sure, that comes into play when it comes to roster size.”
If walk-ons as we know them are eliminated, coaches have discussed the possibility of a taxi/practice squad of players who wouldn’t count toward the roster cap. Think along the lines of men who regularly practice against a school’s women’s basketball team.
SEC coaches even pitched to league leadership the possibility that coaches would take money from their own lucrative contracts to pay for walk-ons, according to The Athletic. That option was shot down.
With settlement terms potentially taking effect as early as fall 2025, the clock may be ticking on walk-ons, perhaps one of the enduring vestiges of the sport’s tradition now in peril.
“They can use different terms around it, but they’re getting rid of walk-ons – it’s a major concern,” Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin told Seth Emerson. “Just the locker room culture of having walk-ons, they become friends with the star scholarship players, and they’re in each other’s weddings down the road, and so many of those guys actually have become coaches. That’s part of the fabric of college football.”

A 74 year old Berkeley chick who looks like this and doesn't know how conferences work deciding the fate of college football. I hate this timeline so much.

 

[Goskers07]

Eliminating walk ons makes no sense to me. Who benefits? Thousands of players with college dreams will be crushed with this decision. So what balances that? Nothing.

 

[Herbie]

Eliminating walk ons makes no sense to me. Who benefits? Thousands of players with college dreams will be crushed with this decision. So what balances that? Nothing.

My dreams were crushed when secc rejected me.

Sounds like the kids need to put their work boots on

 

[Hedley Lamarr]

Walk ons should be allowed to use any and all PEDs they want.

 

[Herbie]

I’m sure I’m in the minority but I’m fine with no walkons.
What Nebraska has been doing for the past 20 years clearly isn’t working well. Scale back the focus and large rosters. Let’s be some six sigma lean leading mother fuckers

 

[Dell Husker]

 

[Herbie]

Amarigone

 

[Carm]

Amarigone

can't be gone if you were never there. He's worked out at Nebraska camps the last two years and wasn't offered

 

[Tsakoi]

This silent commit is so silent that he actually committed to another team to keep it secret.

 

[vailhusker]

 

[Herbie]

You can’t trust Polynesians.

 

[BorWhiskey]

FYI, Callahan says he has it on "good authority" we wanted him and thought he was committed, but that he had a long-standing relationship with and Oregon St coach that won him over, So a less positive take than Tim's.

I also wouldn’t be surprised if Bray had some points to make about the coaching longevity at UNL.

But I believe the “we wanted him” story more than “we weren’t ready to let him commit”.

 

[vailhusker]

After seeing some of the recruits that the coaches have offered this seems like a mistake not offering him so far.

6'2 185 sophomore