You have to kick a sleeping polar bear or tickle a black mamba on the head. Which one would you choose? | Page 2 | The Platinum Board

You have to kick a sleeping polar bear or tickle a black mamba on the head. Which one would you choose?

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

You have to kick a sleeping polar bear or tickle a black mamba on the head. Which one would you choose?

Polar bear is aggressive, territorial, and going to catch and maul you, 99.9% chance it can run anyone besides an elite athlete down in distance.

Mamba you have a slight chance of dodging the bite, maybe 1-5%, and they're probably not going to chase you once you stop bothering them.

I effing hate snakes, but that's the move to maximize survival chances.
 
Usain Bolt’s world record 100 meter would have him still getting mauled at the 2 yard line if he got a 1 second head start
 
I typed up my response to say the Black Mamba. But the more I thought about it, the sleeping aspect of the Polar Bear and 100 yards to safety give the Polar Bear the best chance of survival for me. 1) A kick from me might not even be enough for a Polar Bear to consider it a threat. 2) It's sleeping - it has to wake up, find out which way I'm running and the catch me. It doesn't start of at 25 mph. At 25 mph, it would take the Polar Bear over 8 seconds to run the 100 yards. If I can sprint 15 mph, that would be about 13.5 seconds. It gives me a 5 second window for the Polar Bear to wake up, see where I am and get up to speed. Better odds that the 100% kill rate of a Mamba bite...
Exactly what I was thinking.

Realistically though I'm @dead either way. Would rather die of the snake bite than ripped up by a polar bear.
 
I'll choose the polar bear because they are so cuddly. Give it a light kick, a Coke and a smile and I'm sure he'd understand. Snakes don't like Coke.

The-Coke-Polar-Bear-coke-57341_1024_774.jpg



polar-bear-and-humans.jpeg

polar20bear20istock.jpg
 
I typed up my response to say the Black Mamba. But the more I thought about it, the sleeping aspect of the Polar Bear and 100 yards to safety give the Polar Bear the best chance of survival for me. 1) A kick from me might not even be enough for a Polar Bear to consider it a threat. 2) It's sleeping - it has to wake up, find out which way I'm running and the catch me. It doesn't start of at 25 mph. At 25 mph, it would take the Polar Bear over 8 seconds to run the 100 yards. If I can sprint 15 mph, that would be about 13.5 seconds. It gives me a 5 second window for the Polar Bear to wake up, see where I am and get up to speed. Better odds that the 100% kill rate of a Mamba bite...
@Amk005 reported this post with the following comment

Fact Check: after a Wikipedia rabbit hole, black mamba’s can only slither up to 12mph and have nowhere near their wives’ tale 100% kill rate, though they are extremely aggressive and have a super high L50 toxicity rate. They are afraid of humans and will actively avoid them whereas polar bears are the only bear that will actively hunt humans. ——— if we’re going to allow dissertations we may have to ask members to cite 3 sources, preferably APA style
 
Back
Top