1HuskerDad
Heisman Winner
- Messages
- 22,831
- Likes
- 49,430
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!Over 30 years I win. Guaranteed. Whether or not you can afford the risk during those 30 years depends on the person. 90% of the country lives paycheck to paycheck so yes you are speaking for the majority. I'm not trying to beat 3.5% every year. I'm trying to beat 3.5% over my working lifetime.I understand small business owners do this, but most people would not. Nor should they. Yes the market on average returns much more than 3.5%, but it's not guaranteed. The 3.5% is guaranteed. Most people wouldn't want to put their house on the line for the chance at higher returns in the market.
I'm a bit hypocritical here because I invest while having a mortgage, but I am on a 15 year mortgage. I saw way too many people who took on 30 year mortgages for all the house they could afford, and moved every 5 to 10 years, whose houses never appreciated to the point they had substantial equity, and now they're 60 with a mortgage. Plus, there's the whole risk of spending that extra money rather than investing it, which sinks most people who try this plan.
If someone has some financial commonsense the risk isn't that big. I'm not saying put your entire house on the line. But for example I have clients who have their primary homes paid off so they have a Line Of Credit (Home Equity Loan) on their house that is available if they want to buy something. Have a $600,000 and pull out 30% or $180,000 using that to buy a condo outright to rent out VRBO. They make $30,000/yr profit from the rental which will have the Home Equity Loan paid off relatively quickly. If interest rates drop down they can get a mortgage on it and pay it off quickly. It depends on your comfort level with Risk and your business acumen.Be that as it may....the point stands that most people should not put their houses on the line for the potential of better returns. It would be insane to suggest that for most people.
If you ignore risk, yes on average you win. But you can't really just ignore risk and call it a better investment.Over 30 years I win. Guaranteed. Whether or not you can afford the risk during those 30 years depends on the person. 90% of the country lives paycheck to paycheck so yes you are speaking for the majority. I'm not trying to beat 3.5% every year. I'm trying to beat 3.5% over my working lifetime.
Ok 15 years I still win. At 30 years I'm still ahead.If you ignore risk, yes on average you win. But you can't really just ignore risk and call it a better investment.
And it's not even close to a guaranteed. You don't get to count all 30 years, because this person allocating extra to their mortgage is paying it off in 15, so they're going to match your RoR in the last 15 years, and they can invest more in those 15 years, since they now have no mortgage.
No, at 15 years you don't automatically win. That's nonsense.Ok 15 years I still win. At 30 years I'm still ahead.
Of course that doesn't mean Johnny high school dropout doing day trading is going to win.
I'm not taking risk out of the equation. The risk of investment being less than the reduced principle is at some point there during that 15 years. Especially in the first few years.
At 15 years the person investing (again within reason) wins.
Realistically the average person wouldn't have the stomach for it and withdraw. Either spend the gains or panic at a fall, sell off and tell everyone how bad the market sucks.