- Messages
- 6,606
- Likes
- 21,236
Good morning gents -
Diving right in here, there are always a lot of factors that go into judging people’s job performances at this level. From talent and resources to injuries there is a ton to consider.
But this is a bottom line business, and the bottom line is that our offense hasn’t been good enough.
But why? What is the why behind that? Is it players? Coaches? We’ll get to what I believe the answer to be.
When this staff first got hired I was extremely excited when I heard Rhule’s pool for assistants was in the top 3 in the conference. Rhule excited me, but people I speak with off the board probably got annoyed with how much I asked “Who else?” meaning who is he bringing with him. The only metric that we’ve found to be predictive of a coaches success is who he brings with him and what their track record is.
So when we get to Marcus Satterfield it’s not good. Below are his 5 full seasons as an offensive coordinator in terms of total offense and where he’s at for year 6:
2013 Temple - 88
2014 Temple - 100
2021 South Carolina - 106
2022 South Carolina - 72
2023 Nebraska - 123
2024 Nebraska - 96
If you average all 6 years together you’re at an average finish of 97.5. Crazy enough that means this year is his baseline for how good his offenses are.
If you remove the outliners (72 and 123) crazy enough you’re at 97 and some change.
So the offense we are seeing from this Husker team is exactly what we should expect from Marcus Satterfield.
Can we make the case we don’t have enough talent? I’m not sure you can adequately build that case given that no matter where Satterfield has been his offenses typically rank 97th.
Injuries? Which ones? We’ve actually been fairly healthy this year.
So we could get into a number of other things with these numbers. But it comes down to this offense is operating at the exact level we can expect from Marcus Satterfield and we aren’t judging who he is on a small sample size.
One has to ask what Rhule thought he saw in Satterfield? This is a bottom line business and the bottom line is really bad due in large part to a decision that was made to bring on a guy who’s offenses are 97th best in the nation.
Diving right in here, there are always a lot of factors that go into judging people’s job performances at this level. From talent and resources to injuries there is a ton to consider.
But this is a bottom line business, and the bottom line is that our offense hasn’t been good enough.
But why? What is the why behind that? Is it players? Coaches? We’ll get to what I believe the answer to be.
When this staff first got hired I was extremely excited when I heard Rhule’s pool for assistants was in the top 3 in the conference. Rhule excited me, but people I speak with off the board probably got annoyed with how much I asked “Who else?” meaning who is he bringing with him. The only metric that we’ve found to be predictive of a coaches success is who he brings with him and what their track record is.
So when we get to Marcus Satterfield it’s not good. Below are his 5 full seasons as an offensive coordinator in terms of total offense and where he’s at for year 6:
2013 Temple - 88
2014 Temple - 100
2021 South Carolina - 106
2022 South Carolina - 72
2023 Nebraska - 123
2024 Nebraska - 96
If you average all 6 years together you’re at an average finish of 97.5. Crazy enough that means this year is his baseline for how good his offenses are.
If you remove the outliners (72 and 123) crazy enough you’re at 97 and some change.
So the offense we are seeing from this Husker team is exactly what we should expect from Marcus Satterfield.
Can we make the case we don’t have enough talent? I’m not sure you can adequately build that case given that no matter where Satterfield has been his offenses typically rank 97th.
Injuries? Which ones? We’ve actually been fairly healthy this year.
So we could get into a number of other things with these numbers. But it comes down to this offense is operating at the exact level we can expect from Marcus Satterfield and we aren’t judging who he is on a small sample size.
One has to ask what Rhule thought he saw in Satterfield? This is a bottom line business and the bottom line is really bad due in large part to a decision that was made to bring on a guy who’s offenses are 97th best in the nation.