- Messages
- 15,946
- Likes
- 41,685
Minnesota wasn’t bad when PJ took overMike Riley 2.0 I rather have PJ Fleck who turned bottom feeder Minnesota into a powerhouse in less time that Campbell has done at ISU.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!Minnesota wasn’t bad when PJ took overMike Riley 2.0 I rather have PJ Fleck who turned bottom feeder Minnesota into a powerhouse in less time that Campbell has done at ISU.
True, Jerry Kill was doing wonders there, but Fleck took them to another level and made them more competitive.Minnesota wasn’t bad when PJ took over
The Mike Riley 2.0 thing doesn't make sense to me. Campbell is 2 decades younger. Campbell is comparable to what Fleck has produced. Both of them have produced one great season and a bunch of good but not great seasons and have basically the same resume blemishes. Can they recruit at a high level? Why haven't they beaten Cockeye with any regularity? Now Fleck might be a more attractive candidate because he's got a record of success in our division, but he's just as much Mike Riley as Matt Campbell isMike Riley 2.0 I rather have PJ Fleck who turned bottom feeder Minnesota into a powerhouse in less time that Campbell has done at ISU.
True Jerry kill had Minnesota and in good shape. Just Tracy Claeys was just a poor HC cupboards were never bare there like they are here.Minnesota wasn’t bad when PJ took over
Another big difference is Campbell is a midwest guy and understands the landscape better. Riley was pretty much geographically tied to the west coast most of his life.The Mike Riley 2.0 thing doesn't make sense to me. Campbell is 2 decades younger. Campbell is comparable to what Fleck has produced. Both of them have produced one great season and a bunch of good but not great seasons and have basically the same resume blemishes. Can they recruit at a high level? Why haven't they beaten Cockeyes with any regularity? Now Fleck might be a more attractive candidate because he's got a record of success in our division, but he's just as much Mike Riley as Matt Campbell is
Claeys got fired for an SA thing tho and he was 9-4 in his one full season. Other than the one season where Fleck had two first round talent WRs, the record from Kill on is the same.True Jerry kill had Minnesota and in good shape. Just Tracy Claeys was just a poor HC cupboards were never bare there like they are here.
Let's not say things we can't take back. The coaching improvement of peepants over Campbell is not worth selling your soul to the devil of LGBTQ+. That's who peepants worships.Mike Riley 2.0 I rather have PJ Fleck who turned bottom feeder Minnesota into a powerhouse in less time that Campbell has done at ISU.
It's really not hate. I would just be disappointed we settled.I will never understand the hate for hiring Campbell.
I guess I don't expect us to do any better than a P5 head coach with 6+ years of experience and a .570 record, but maybe I'm shooting lowIt's really not hate. I would just be disappointed we settled.
Yes you are shooting low.I guess I don't expect us to do any better than a P5 head coach with 6+ years of experience and a .570 record, but maybe I'm shooting low
Outside of Gundy and Whittingham, I don't know who else is reasonably on the board who has a better resume, but my brain is basically melting down with the sheer volume of candidates that I probably can't remember all of themYes you are shooting low.
If we end up with him after striking out on better options then fine. He's not something to strive for from the beginning.
Urban and Lane train. I'll consider them not reasonably on the board when them or Turd personally tell me they're out.Outside of Gundy and Whittingham, I don't know who else is reasonably on the board who has a better resume.c
I will never understand the hate for hiring Campbell.
Your best argument for MC is that he's a little worse than Peepants?The Mike Riley 2.0 thing doesn't make sense to me. Campbell is 2 decades younger. Campbell is comparable to what Fleck has produced. Both of them have produced one great season and a bunch of good but not great seasons and have basically the same resume blemishes. Can they recruit at a high level? Why haven't they beaten Cockeyes with any regularity? Now Fleck might be a more attractive candidate because he's got a record of success in our division, but he's just as much Mike Riley as Matt Campbell is
No. It's that he's got 6ish years of P5 experience, a fiesta bowl, 5 winning seasons, has established crootin inroads in lots of the Midwest, and is young. I like Whittingham, Gundy, and Stoops more than him, but idk how movable they are. Probably Kiffin too. Kiffin doesn't.have as long of track record, but he's a top notch crooter.Your best argument for MC is that he's a little worse than Peepants?
Matt Campbell is fucking awful in games that are supposed to be tight (spread -3-+3).I will never understand the hate for hiring Campbell.
Watching him against Aranda made me want Aranda more. Dude seems to adjust quickly in game where Campbell and/or his staff don’t seem quite as sharp.Matt Campbell is fucking awful in games that are supposed to be tight (spread -3-+3).
His team's are fucking awful vs the B1G west.
His team's never played with expectations and the one time they did they massively underachieved.
He is the Midwest younger version is Riley
The Riley comparison is still shit, but fineMatt Campbell is fucking awful in games that are supposed to be tight (spread -3-+3).
His team's are fucking awful vs the B1G west.
His team's never played with expectations and the one time they did they massively underachieved.
He is the Midwest younger version is Riley
Yeah Riley was a walking limp dick. Not sure Campbell is there yet.The Riley comparison is still shit, but fine