Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

If we can give Hoiberg time why not Rhule?

We struggle in year one (as most of Aurich’s first year teams have) and he gets canned?

How do you figure that? His first (and only) year as DC at San Diego State was great, and his first year as DC at Idaho wasn't bad (#43/130 scoring D).
 
It doesn't matter what Rhule does a reasonable amount of you will argue that whatever he does is the wrong move.

TW leaves. He hires from within to maintain continuity of staff and scheme, something I heard on the radio last night was an issue with Rhule. It was stated that Rhule never has the same staff year over year. What college program does?

So Rhule hires Butler for the reasons mentioned above. Some on this board, including me, didn't like the hire, but I understood the basis for the decision. The reasoning made sense. Halfway through the year, Rhule realizes the defense can't stop the run. My opinion is that we were poorly coached in run fits from the second and third levels. More on that in a second...

Rhule 86s Butler and hires a DC that has a track record of very good defenses. This DC hires the guys he wants to implement said defense. I've heard on this board plenty of times that Rhule should let the coordinators have a say in their staff. Holgo got Shorts last season and Wade this season to better implement what he wants to run. So Aurich gets his DL coach, did the optics of this look questionable? Absolutely, but he has experience in the scheme and is someone Aurich wanted. Aurich got a safeties coach and and edge coach.

So from a coaching hire standpoint, I don't see the issues everyone else does. Did you want Rhule to stick with Butler or make the change? Did you want Rhule to ride with Donnie or make the change? You can't have it both ways and you can't always get exactly what you want both from a coach and player perspective.

We all wanted an established guy on the interior DL, but I'm not in the building. I don't get to see what they see everyday from the guys who didn't play this season. I'm also not going to put the regression of DL play entirely on the players. I don't know what they were being coached with regrad to technique or scheme. DL looked bad, Rhule fired the coach.

He's willing to make the decisions we have wanted previous HCs to make, then we crucify him for HAVING to make those decisions like we're all prophets and can predict the previous hire wouldn't work out.

That's what good leaders do. They make changes to course correct to stay on the right path. I've hired people that were fantastic in interviews and had remarkable resumes only to see that they weren't going to be a good fit a couple of months in. Not every decision is a homerun or even a hit. Sometimes you're going to strike out.

I see a prominsing path and still think Rhule is the guy for the job. I do not want to be a program with a revolving door at HC. We're FL, FSU, Auburn, PSU, etc. right now. Once great programs that are getting in their own way because they aren't willing to see it through.
The problem is, if Rhule only realized halfway through the year that we can’t stop the run, he’s totally incompetent. When we lost the polar bear and Ty, everyone knew we would have a gaping hole in the middle of the line. We completely failed to fill that hole, and were abysmal against the run. That’s not on Butler, it’s on Rhule.
 
You guys gonna make out
UV0nZV.gif
 
I'm going to respecftully pushback. Basketball is kind of my wheelhouse and nothing he's doing now is remotely close to what they were doing the first 3-4 years.
Agreed, we are giving completely different looks and approaches to both sides of the ball.
 
It doesn't matter what Rhule does a reasonable amount of you will argue that whatever he does is the wrong move.

TW leaves. He hires from within to maintain continuity of staff and scheme, something I heard on the radio last night was an issue with Rhule. It was stated that Rhule never has the same staff year over year. What college program does?

So Rhule hires Butler for the reasons mentioned above. Some on this board, including me, didn't like the hire, but I understood the basis for the decision. The reasoning made sense. Halfway through the year, Rhule realizes the defense can't stop the run. My opinion is that we were poorly coached in run fits from the second and third levels. More on that in a second...

Rhule 86s Butler and hires a DC that has a track record of very good defenses. This DC hires the guys he wants to implement said defense. I've heard on this board plenty of times that Rhule should let the coordinators have a say in their staff. Holgo got Shorts last season and Wade this season to better implement what he wants to run. So Aurich gets his DL coach, did the optics of this look questionable? Absolutely, but he has experience in the scheme and is someone Aurich wanted. Aurich got a safeties coach and and edge coach.

So from a coaching hire standpoint, I don't see the issues everyone else does. Did you want Rhule to stick with Butler or make the change? Did you want Rhule to ride with Donnie or make the change? You can't have it both ways and you can't always get exactly what you want both from a coach and player perspective.

We all wanted an established guy on the interior DL, but I'm not in the building. I don't get to see what they see everyday from the guys who didn't play this season. I'm also not going to put the regression of DL play entirely on the players. I don't know what they were being coached with regrad to technique or scheme. DL looked bad, Rhule fired the coach.

He's willing to make the decisions we have wanted previous HCs to make, then we crucify him for HAVING to make those decisions like we're all prophets and can predict the previous hire wouldn't work out.

That's what good leaders do. They make changes to course correct to stay on the right path. I've hired people that were fantastic in interviews and had remarkable resumes only to see that they weren't going to be a good fit a couple of months in. Not every decision is a homerun or even a hit. Sometimes you're going to strike out.

I see a prominsing path and still think Rhule is the guy for the job. I do not want to be a program with a revolving door at HC. We're FL, FSU, Auburn, PSU, etc. right now. Once great programs that are getting in their own way because they aren't willing to see it through.
This is really spot on. Take this, make it a little more pedantic, and it's my post.
 
If Rhule wants to play the ‘look what we did with EJ’ card as to why he didnt bring in a RB, maybe remind him we just went 7 and fucking 6 with the easiest schedule in a decade
 
It's an important distinction tho. And you get way more opportunities. I'll never understand why a fan thinks, "We had a losing season, but at least we beat a ranked team" is better than "we had a winning season, but we didn't beat anyone ranked"
Okay - Rhule is 0-9 against ranked teams in 3 years. Fred is 6-3 against ranked teams the last two years. Are those two things equal considering the level of financial support provided to each?

You completely made up words and tried to spin it as if I was saying NU’s 2021 season was better than last year’s NU season. All I said was that there were signs early in Fred’s tenure despite them losing games that the team was well coached and that even translated into beating a few teams they clearly were not better than. If you watched the team you could see that.

Name a single game Nebraska has played under Rhule where we’ve gotten a result equivalent to Fred winning at a top 10 team as a 12.5 point underdog? NU has won 3 games as an underdog under Rhule - @ Illinois in 2023 (+3), Purdue at home in 2023 (+1.5), and @ UCLA in 2025 (+2). Name any time you’ve watched NU play this past year and been like “wow even though they are losing that game I see us coming together and see the vision”. You simply can’t.
 
Rhule 86s Butler and hires a DC that has a track record of very good defenses. This DC hires the guys he wants to implement said defense. I've heard on this board plenty of times that Rhule should let the coordinators have a say in their staff. Holgo got Shorts last season and Wade this season to better implement what he wants to run. So Aurich gets his DL coach, did the optics of this look questionable? Absolutely, but he has experience in the scheme and is someone Aurich wanted. Aurich got a safeties coach and and edge coach.

So from a coaching hire standpoint, I don't see the issues everyone else does. Did you want Rhule to stick with Butler or make the change? Did you want Rhule to ride with Donnie or make the change? You can't have it both ways and you can't always get exactly what you want both from a coach and player perspective.

We all wanted an established guy on the interior DL, but I'm not in the building. I don't get to see what they see everyday from the guys who didn't play this season. I'm also not going to put the regression of DL play entirely on the players. I don't know what they were being coached with regrad to technique or scheme. DL looked bad, Rhule fired the coach.
Let's be fair here. We heard 2 rumors this offseason about defensive staff not related to the DC. That they (NU/Rhule) allegedly told Kehres he was keeping Addison Williams and that Elijah Robinson was going to be a Co-DC/DL coach. And heaven forbid. Can't fire future DC Rob. So that's 3 people who would have been "forced" onto future DC/Kehres/Aurich

What/who exactly was the next DC hiring? They kinda shoehorned in Taylor and created a position for Manning to be on staff.

2. The whole DL coach hiring process lasted way to fucking long. Aurich/Rhule had 2+ weeks to line up anything resembling a plan and the next chirps people heard were about a JUCO position coach and then Corey Brown. Just a bizarre process from willing to spend X to make a guy paid over 1mill with extra titles to hiring out of a bad MAC team.

3. I speculate Jobu would still be at Nebraska if he wasn't throwing players under the bus. And no, the part in the media definitely isn't the first time Jobu blamed the players.

4. The special teams fiasco. For whatever reason Ek doesn't want to be here. By analytics, Nebraska just put up their best special teams season in the last 15 years and letting that guy walk out the door and trying to "replace him in the aggregate" is hilarious. The interview in the middle of this process is a bad look.

5. I do not really care to talk about Rhule. I've spouted my piece multiple times on this board and without new information nobody is changing their minds (including me).

As for Hoiberg vs Rhule -- Its Nebraskaball. Hoiberg had his stumbles and it overlapped with 2 covid years. He's steadily improved his product with minimum money and NIL. And has caught lightning in a bottle for 26'.

Rhule is paid like a top 15 coach has top 25 NIL and giving up top 50 results. He's shot himself in the foot in game and out of game more times than I wish to count. He's made excuses, overestimated his coaching/coaches and developing abilities and continues to surround himself with yes men and not leaders. Luckily, he's got a great agent and contract that buys him more time.
 
Okay - Rhule is 0-9 against ranked teams in 3 years. Fred is 6-3 against ranked teams the last two years. Are those two things equal considering the level of financial support provided to each?
What was Fred's record against ranked teams his first 3-4 years? Legitimately asking as I don't know, but I suspect it was pretty horrendous. If we're comparing the two, then comparing their results during the first few seasons seems like the only relevant way to put those apples & oranges on the same scale.
 
I don't think Rhule is as good of a coach as Hoiberg.

But when you think about it their career paths are crazy similar. From fast rise, to professional bad/mediocrity (Hoiberg did have a playoff appearance) and then to Nebraska.

I don't know why it's different to me, but it's different to me. With what we've seen from Nebraska football do you think Rhule can get Nebraska to top 10 status in a regular season by 2029? That's essentially what Hoiberg has done right?
 
Back
Top