Good post. I think two things (or more) can be true at once.
As
@Driveway Jordan said...based on the difficulty of the job he's not overpaid, and I happen to agree. I'm not an AD, so I simply have an opinion vs. professional knowledge of what should be appropriate.
The following can be true.
- He's tied for the 6th highest paid coach - fact
- Overpaid/underpaid. We disagree on this, but let's say he wins 23 games and has a win in the NCAA...then people will think he's underpaid because others will come after him
- If he wins 20 and bounces in the B1G tourney and goes to the NIT, many will consider him overpaid
- Considering the difficulty of the job he may actually be appropriately paid.
- He basically sucked for 3.5 years - fact
- His teams trend upward - fact
- He coaches at a school that is the most historically abysmal school in CBB - fact
I agree though, I think he likes Lincoln and we have an AD that he has a lot of respect for. Let's just hope he wins 20-25 and gets us to the dance and wins one. Then suddenly nobody will care that he's tied for 6th highest compensation.