SoCal_Corn
Quarterback
- Messages
- 3,645
- Likes
- 12,237
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!I had to listen to Zac Smith’s podcast last week titled week 9 matchup. Vs. Raiola. Smith and his sidekick thought Nebraska could go 7-0 into that game and they thought Nebraska would end 9-3 to 11-1 with the schedule. I was shocked, but Smith is a huge Rhule fan. Their assumption was also based off Raiola living up to the hype of course because they think we we have some talent around him.As you all well know, I am extremely pessimistic and I don't really believe any of this at all, but a moronic thought I had after reading posts about our schedule, what if Nebraska starts hot and drops an absolute deuce on Colorado with Raiola out dueling EA Sports top rated QB in what will likely be one of the most watched games of that weekend? Does something like coming out on the national stage in that game and running out to a 5,6,7-0 start get him into the conversation in a meaningful way?
To be clear, Raiola may not be good, we will probably shit out pants as we regularly do with "easy" schedules, and even if we don't we may not win enough games. This isn't a shot call, but is there a path that is even 5% realistic?
There was talk about AMart at one time.
and TMart at one time
Yes, if TMart can be in the converstation halfway through his freshman season, than Raiola can be. TMart had us 5-0 and ranked No. 5 after doing this to Kansas State on in front of a captive Thursday night national TV audience:
(Not to be a downer, but the next week was the infamous Redout Around the World game against Texas).
Adrian, as far as I recall, was never in the Heisman discussion his freshman year. If you will recall, we started 0-6 that season. That kills any campain before it starts. I do remember 2AM being mentioned in the Heisman discussion going into his sophomore year. But not during his freshman season.
Yes, if TMart can be in the converstation halfway through his freshman season, than Raiola can be. TMart had us 5-0 and ranked No. 5 after doing this to Kansas State on in front of a captive Thursday night national TV audience:
(Not to be a downer, but the next week was the infamous Redout Around the World game against Texas).
Adrian, as far as I recall, was never in the Heisman discussion his freshman year. If you will recall, we started 0-6 that season. That kills any campain before it starts. I do remember 2AM being mentioned in the Heisman discussion going into his sophomore year. But not during his freshman season.
Yes, if TMart can be in the converstation halfway through his freshman season, then Raiola can be. TMart had us 5-0 and ranked No. 5 after doing this to Kansas State in front of a captive Thursday night national TV audience:
(Not to be a downer, but the next week was the infamous Redout Around the World game against Texas).
Adrian, as far as I recall, was never in the Heisman discussion his freshman year. If you will recall, we started 0-6 that season. That kills any campain before it starts. I do remember 2AM being mentioned in the Heisman discussion going into his sophomore year. But not during his freshman season.
He honestly absolutely maximized with his limited ability as a QB. Would of taken a T-Magic in a heartbeat last year.As frustrating as it was at times, I have a lot of hindsight resepct for T-Magic
Here's my comment to this:As you all well know, I am extremely pessimistic and I don't really believe any of this at all, but a moronic thought I had after reading posts about our schedule, what if Nebraska starts hot and drops an absolute deuce on Colorado with Raiola out dueling EA Sports top rated QB in what will likely be one of the most watched games of that weekend? Does something like coming out on the national stage in that game and running out to a 5,6,7-0 start get him into the conversation in a meaningful way?
To be clear, Raiola may not be good, we will probably shit out pants as we regularly do with "easy" schedules, and even if we don't we may not win enough games. This isn't a shot call, but is there a path that is even 5% realistic?
Let’s look at it through the scope of betting.
I believe I saw him at +12,000 a week or two ago.
Would you feel good throwing down $500 on that? If he doesn’t win, you lose $500. If he wins, you take home $60,000.
Heading to Council Bluffs real quick, brb.
You forgot the . after the 5.Let’s look at it through the scope of betting.
I believe I saw him at +12,000 a week or two ago.
Would you feel good throwing down $500 on that? If he doesn’t win, you lose $500. If he wins, you take home $60,000.
Heading to Council Bluffs real quick, brb.
Gotta spend money to make moneyLet’s look at it through the scope of betting.
I believe I saw him at +12,000 a week or two ago.
Would you feel good throwing down $500 on that? If he doesn’t win, you lose $500. If he wins, you take home $60,000.
Heading to Council Bluffs real quick, brb.
You forgot the . after the 5.
Yeah I'm an idiot.methinks he is +12,000
meaning you bet $100 you win $12,000.
&
not 12,000 to 1
Yeah I'm an idiot.
We probably win 10 games last year with T-Magic.He honestly absolutely maximized with his limited ability as a QB. Would have taken a T-Magic in a heartbeat last year.
@SoCal_Corn was so nice about it too.