Welcome to tPB!

Please either login or register for an account to access the forums.

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Welp...we are witnessing the end of football. (2 Viewers)

Tsakoi

Running Back
Elite Member
Messages
1,838
Likes
10,874
I know that lots of my posts lately have been sour, but frankly there hasn't been much good news to be excited about. That continues here.

This tweet and story by the OWH should terrify everyone interested in CFB.



This is what anyone following the evolution of NIL have been scared of from the start. We are handing football over to the rich. (even more than it was before) Little groups or "pods" of NIL donors are forming. The price tags for membership is in the thousands. This will not morph into something good for Husker athletics (or any place that this is happening) It will spiral out of control sooner rather than later.

You all know the entitlement you feel when you pay for something. When you buy something or pay for a service you expect some sort of result. You want your money's worth. A quality product, superior service, increased access....etc etc. Now the athletic department is selling access to literally dozens and dozens of groups willing to pay. Access to coaches and players, if the article is to be believed, at regular intervals. I know that this has already existed to some level in the past, but not in these numbers. And the planned events in this case will dwarf the number of events that were expected in the past. The article mentions that this access would be monthly to most groups. So now a sizable amount of time won't be spent game planning, recruiting or simply resting....our coaches are gonna be financially obligated to spend even more time glad handing NIL donors, answering inane questions and listening to various opinions from people who are far from experts. As I said this is something they already do to a lesser degree on occasion but there is a huge difference now. Now they aren't just meeting with fans but rather investors, and investors, people who have put in over $5.000, will bring their privilege along with them. The dynamic will have changed from Coach/Player with a curious fan like you had in the past to the new dynamic of CEO (coach) and investor. You all know rich dudes, now imagine that rich guy feels like his money wasn't well spent after watching us lose yet again to Illinois. You know how this access is gonna play out. You know what these "meetings" are going to turn into. You think Big Red Reaction post game shows or message board vitriol is bad? Wait until someone drops $10k on a RB who trips behind the line of scrimmage on a play that the coach lined him up in the shotgun on 1st&Goal from the one.

The quality of coach that is willing to play this NIL game will trend toward the ones that are comfortable chasing cash and the guys who coach because they love the game or are in it because they are actually good at coaching will decrease. What I mean is why take a job in which you are no longer able to do the part of the job you like because you need to attend another dinner hosted by country club Charlie who wants you to explain why you didn't give playing time to the WR he's paying for? In the past these donors at least were under the guise of making donations to the "school"...now literally you have financial backers of a true freshman RB that want an update on his status. How long until one of these dudes, who consider themselves elite businessmen, want to be a part of the recruiting visits? Be the pitch man? Be the talent evaluator? Have their money decide who gets an offer?

Basically this is just my long way of saying that rich, entitled dudes with ceaselessly expanding access to college football are going to ruin the sport because that is what rich entitled dudes do to everything.
 

lee_carvallo_12

Quarterback
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
4,672
Likes
22,117
Yep, I read a good article the other day on NIL and making the clear distinction between legit NIL and pay-for-play by boosters paying players. There’s a big difference between the two and the latter is gonna destroy the sport.
 

Tsakoi

Running Back
Elite Member
Messages
1,838
Likes
10,874
Yep, I read a good article the other day on NIL and making the clear distinction between legit NIL and pay-for-play by boosters paying players. There’s a big difference between the two and the latter is gonna destroy the sport.
No joke. Imagine what Texas is going to be like where the only thing that one of those rich dudes wants more than football glory is for everyone to see them as a big shot. I know not every NIL donor will pretend like they are the Wolf of Wall Street but if there are for example 20 of them....won't at least 5 of them be egomaniacal pricks?

We are also setting up a system where it makes financial sense to either extort your current team or transfer. Say a DE gets a basic NIL package and then goes out and has a huge year with 18 TFL that includes 9 sacks. It would be stupid of him not to demand a giant pay day or transfer and be guaranteed to get one somewhere else. Loyalty will have a price and that price will be just slightly higher than what you are currently getting.

What about when one of these "pods" prefer a certain junior QB to start and another "pod" thinks the freshman QB is better. Not only do they think he is better but they have put in 100s of thousands of dollars to get him to commit to the program and know that he could transfer at any time. The junior has waited his turn and deserves the chance but the money guys are pressuring the coach and say they will withhold future recruiting NIL cash if they dont get what they want. The original group says the same. What then? Trust me this exact scenario is happening at Texas as we speak with Quinn Ewers and the reportedly monster package he was offered to transfer from OSU to Tex. Good luck, Sark.
 

Tsakoi

Running Back
Elite Member
Messages
1,838
Likes
10,874
Let’s call it what it is, CFB Free Agency. I’m of the age demographic that should be on board and I hate it
But its something more than just free agency. Its more like a free for all.

Free agency is conducted with players working under the same rules league wide. The number of free agents is limited to the number of players out of contract at any given time, not any player any time they feel like it. Free agents are courted by a relatively small amount of teams who can be interested based on their salary cap situation, which is also regulated by the same rules league wide. None of that exists in college football. Not even close.
 

...TrueColors...

Graduate Assistant
Insider
Messages
5,912
Likes
19,042
But its something more than just free agency. Its more like a free for all.

Free agency is conducted with players working under the same rules league wide. The number of free agents is limited to the number of players out of contract at any given time, not any player any time they feel like it. Free agents are courted by a relatively small amount of teams who can be interested based on their salary cap situation, which is also regulated by the same rules league wide. None of that exists in college football. Not even close.

What it’ll likely end up being is the NCAA lobbying for control and then attempting to get an anti-trust exemption from congress. It’ll likely end up being worse with regulation from the incompetent.
 
Last edited:

Tsakoi

Running Back
Elite Member
Messages
1,838
Likes
10,874
Football was handed over to the rich a long time ago.
Yes, I mentioned that

But that was a limited number of people. A small and manageable amount of people that most athletic departments were aware of and knew for a long, long time. Not competing groups of every Johnny come lately, swinging dick with a checkbook that'll be demanding an audience with the starting left and right tackles.
 

CornHub

Offensive Lineman
Messages
1,058
Likes
2,605
I couldn't read the article, but I have a hard time believing that any kind of meetings between boosters and coaches about NIL would be on record anywhere. That would still be breaking the rules as far as the NCAA is concerned.
 

Cash68847

Offensive Coordinator
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
9,125
Likes
17,304
But its something more than just free agency. Its more like a free for all.

Free agency is conducted with players working under the same rules league wide. The number of free agents is limited to the number of players out of contract at any given time, not any player any time they feel like it. Free agents are courted by a relatively small amount of teams who can be interested based on their salary cap situation, which is also regulated by the same rules league wide. None of that exists in college football. Not even close.
The top schools have always had an advantage anyways. College football has never had the same playing field.
 

Baron Winnebago

Scrote Statistician
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
17,654
Likes
70,097
I’m not sure I’d consider that a remedy. But they’ll pitch it as one.
Depends what they do. I'm just not sure how sustainable it is for college athletics to basically have no effective governing body and a patchwork of state laws that (at best) dictate what NIL deals can and can't be.
 

Log in or sign up to benefit more from the forum!

Log in or register to benefit more from the forum!

Register

Creating an account on the forum is completely free.

Register now
Log in

If you have an account, please log in

Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Theme editor

Theme customizations

Graphic backgrounds

Granite backgrounds