Welcome to The Platinum Board

We are a Nebraska Husker fan community. Please either login or register for an account

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

TPB X thread

Well … shyst. I waited to long to check back tonight & da tweet is gone. But let’s hear it for the tough, old buzzards!

Damn, the video was great


Old Mexican guy vs man bun cross fit vegan


You could immediately tell kid was fucked the second the old man started moving in the ring. Shoulders down, head and feet constantly moving, etc. I bet he would have literally killed that vegan if they didn’t stop the fight.
 
Damn, the video was great


Old Mexican guy vs man bun cross fit vegan


You could immediately tell kid was fucked the second the old man started moving in the ring. Shoulders down, head and feet constantly moving, etc. I bet he would have literally killed that vegan if they didn’t stop the fight.
I’ve been in a tussle or two when it didn’t take me long to realize I was overmatched. That’s about the time that “fighting fair” goes out the window.

AlDavisJustWinBaby.gif
 
Never, and I mean NEVER, bring a knife to a gun fight! 😏



Screen-Shot-2021-11-15-at-4.16.21-PM.png






PS: Binger and the fat fuck assistant DA should both be disbarred and the State should consent to any civil suit for malicious prosecution. As a former prosecutor I fucking can’t believe they brought the charges they brought. (Let alone argued the way they did) I only ever filed for things I thought we could get a guilty verdict. (or plea) This reminds me of the brandishing a weapon charge vs that dork and his ugly wife in STL, totally unjustified to file that charge when you know there was a 0.0% chance of guilty. Total political stunt.
 
Screen-Shot-2021-11-15-at-4.16.21-PM.png






PS: Binger and the fat fuck assistant DA should both be disbarred and the State should consent to any civil suit for malicious prosecution. As a former prosecutor I fucking can’t believe they brought the charges they brought. (Let alone argued the way they did) I only ever filed for things I thought we could get a guilty verdict. (or plea) This reminds me of the brandishing a weapon charge vs that dork and his ugly wife in STL, totally unjustified to file that charge when you know there was a 0.0% chance of guilty. Total political stunt.
Not to mention trying to paint the pedophile and the other two criminals as heroic figures.

They're all degenerate as fuck
 
Not to mention trying to paint the pedophile and the other two criminals as heroic figures.

They're all degenerate as fuck


He has misstated the Law several times and has made arguments that I’ve never seen a prosecutor make before.


Ex: I have never read/heard/seen the argument: “defendant is a pussy for using a weapon cuz he should have just fist fought the 3+ guys”. Arguments against self defense almost always turn on if there was an actual threat of bodily harm to defendant and if the force used in defense was reasonable in comparison to the threat.

Here, the prosecution is arguing that Yes, there were multiple threats to (and actual) bodily harm but self defense shouldn’t apply cuz it was just a simple fist fight. This is AFTER one of the attackers gave sworn testimony in court that Defendant did not shoot him until attacker pulled a handgun and pointed it at Defendant. This testimony was corroborated with 2 different sources of video evidence from law enforcement.

So AFTER it has been established the self defense didn’t happen until a gun was drawn and pointed the prosecution is STILL arguing self defense shouldn’t apply cuz just boys being boys fist a cuffs basic locker room stuff why you being a pussy using a gun?




Never seen anything like it.

Given the evidence on record. (Attacker testimony, video x2, defendant testimony) Arguing self defense shouldn’t apply because use of a gun was unreasonable after NOT trying to impeach the attacker witness (and the video evidence x2) is literal bad faith arguing.




PS: not to mention their argument of “well he brought a gun so he was asking for it” is literally “rape victim was asking for it dressed like that”. I also see some media and blue checks on Twitter using this argument of “well he had a gun so he was hunting for trouble”… amazing. The argument lacks logic or any legal basis. It’s one thing for idiot journalists and blue checks on Twitter to say but the District Attorney and assistant DA arguing this in court is insane.
 
He has misstated the Law several times and has made arguments that I’ve never seen a prosecutor make before.


Ex: I have never read/heard/seen the argument: “defendant is a pussy for using a weapon cuz he should have just fist fought the 3+ guys”. Arguments against self defense almost always turn on if there was an actual threat of bodily harm to defendant and if the force used in defense was reasonable in comparison to the threat.

Here, the prosecution is arguing that Yes, there were multiple threats to (and actual) bodily harm but self defense shouldn’t apply cuz it was just a simple fist fight. This is AFTER one of the attackers gave sworn testimony in court that Defendant did not shoot him until attacker pulled a handgun and pointed it at Defendant. This testimony was corroborated with 2 different sources of video evidence from law enforcement.

So AFTER it has been established the self defense didn’t happen until a gun was drawn and pointed the prosecution is STILL arguing self defense shouldn’t apply cuz just boys being boys fist a cuffs basic locker room stuff why you being a pussy using a gun?




Never seen anything like it.

Given the evidence on record. (Attacker testimony, video x2, defendant testimony) Arguing self defense shouldn’t apply because use of a gun was unreasonable after NOT trying to impeach the attacker witness (and the video evidence x2) is literal bad faith arguing.




PS: not to mention their argument of “well he brought a gun so he was asking for it” is literally “rape victim was asking for it dressed like that”. I also see some media and blue checks on Twitter using this argument of “well he had a gun so he was hunting for trouble”… amazing. The argument lacks logic or any legal basis. It’s one thing for idiot journalists and blue checks on Twitter to say but the District Attorney and assistant DA arguing this in court is insane.
If he's convicted, the appeal - which it appears to my layman eyes there's multiple grounds for - should be held at a new venue. Say ... the Red Willow County courthouse in NE. A jury of his true peers will have that young man watching free sunrises in less than a week.
 
Yeah, the prosecutor has been pretty terrible. But Rittenhouse is an idiot and caused his own problem. It's a ridiculous standard if a 17-year-old kid can run into a crowd with an AR, freak people out and have them react to it, and then shoot them because he fears for his safety. Worse since the next two shootings were people responding to what they reasonably perceived to be an active shooter. The rape analogy works if someone had was wearing a "rape me" t-shirt, and then proceeded to rape their would-be attackers.
 

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Wide/Narrow view

    You can control a structure that you can use to use your theme wide or narrow.

    Grid view forum list

    You can control the layout of the forum list in a grid or ordinary listing style structure.

    Close sidebar

    You can get rid of the crowded view in the forum by closing the sidebar.

    Fixed sidebar

    You can make it more useful and easier to access by pinning the sidebar.

  • Color combinations cannot be used

    Color combinations are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.

    Color gradient backgrounds
Back