- Messages
- 1,342
- Likes
- 13,193
Not much to pass along but I do want to play devils advocate here on the Raiola situation.
According to Waterboy, he says that Raiola appeared to be a much better coach than Greg Austin from his perspective of wat hung practice. How he spoke to players, how good of a “teacher” he was, how much players responded to and respected him, etc. we’re all night and say better than Austin. Of course Waterboy only has GA rn compare DR to, but he says there’s a clear difference.
So why did our offensive line look so bad this year? Many things. New system, which happened to do the offensive line no favors in terms of what it was asking them to do. S&C program that turned them into inflexible and immobile piles of shit. 4 years of bad habits from GA. The most poorly recruited position group on the field. No depth. Lost our center. This list goes on.
The offensive line is the most developmental position group on the field and I think we were all crazy to think there was going to be a huge jump in year one with a new position coach, while also working under a lane duck head coach and an offensive coordinator who changed the scheme dramatically. I wish we looked better than we did, however I don’t think most of our expectations were realistic.
Bottom line: the jury’s still out on Raiola. We don’t have enough objective information to draw any clear conclusions on his long-term potential as an offensive line coach. If you listen to Matt Rhule talk, he doesn’t sound like a guy who’s going to hire Raiola on a whim. He’s got a plan, and he understands the stakes. He must have gotten a good enough feel for him during the interview process that he feels good about leaving him on staff, and I’m going to defer to him in this situation.
Everyone needs to chill the fuck out.
According to Waterboy, he says that Raiola appeared to be a much better coach than Greg Austin from his perspective of wat hung practice. How he spoke to players, how good of a “teacher” he was, how much players responded to and respected him, etc. we’re all night and say better than Austin. Of course Waterboy only has GA rn compare DR to, but he says there’s a clear difference.
So why did our offensive line look so bad this year? Many things. New system, which happened to do the offensive line no favors in terms of what it was asking them to do. S&C program that turned them into inflexible and immobile piles of shit. 4 years of bad habits from GA. The most poorly recruited position group on the field. No depth. Lost our center. This list goes on.
The offensive line is the most developmental position group on the field and I think we were all crazy to think there was going to be a huge jump in year one with a new position coach, while also working under a lane duck head coach and an offensive coordinator who changed the scheme dramatically. I wish we looked better than we did, however I don’t think most of our expectations were realistic.
Bottom line: the jury’s still out on Raiola. We don’t have enough objective information to draw any clear conclusions on his long-term potential as an offensive line coach. If you listen to Matt Rhule talk, he doesn’t sound like a guy who’s going to hire Raiola on a whim. He’s got a plan, and he understands the stakes. He must have gotten a good enough feel for him during the interview process that he feels good about leaving him on staff, and I’m going to defer to him in this situation.
Everyone needs to chill the fuck out.