- Messages
- 1,333
- Likes
- 11,602
1) What are you taught in regards to targeting? What’s the letter of the law that NCAA officials have to follow?
2) What type of post game follow up is done by conferences with officials? Are the clips that teams send in on what they think are “bad calls” ever discussed or even reviewed?
1. Targeting is easily the most hated rule in football by the fans, however it's something that the conferences and coaches want out of the game. The rules are there for a reason.
There are 2 different aspects of targeting in the rule book. First rule 9-1-3 which is "forceable contact with the crown of the helmet". This is when defender lowers his head and initiates contact with the top of the helmet. Rule 9-1-4 is "initiating contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless player". Most common blowing up a WR.
So what were seeing now is a decrease of 9-1-4 and a huge spike in 9-1-3 this year. Which isn't a good thing. Now when in doubt it's targeting. The players really brought this on themselves. NFL basically eliminated it, but college is still a huge issue.
Replay was introduced to catch everything since on field its nearly impossible to get all of them. 9-1-4 is easier to see. Replay gives lots angles which makes it easy to see.
2. Teams send in plays each week for conference go review. These make it on training tapes for conference calls and NCAA training tape. Crews also review their own game. Penalties are submitted and descriptions of what you saw and why you called it. The game film is evaluated by a grader. Calls and non calls are graded as missed calls (called), no call missed calls, marginal calls, correct call, incorrect judgment. These grades go into future game assignments and bowl games. Plus if you remain in the conference or if in lower conference move up.
These training tapes look like this (play 5 covers targeting)
Last edited: