Breaking - Oregon and Washington to the B1G | Page 16 | The Platinum Board

Breaking Oregon and Washington to the B1G

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Breaking Oregon and Washington to the B1G

Stanford's bread and butter w/ sports is all the non-rev shit. I don't know how the fuck that would work in the ACC unless the unless the ACC covers travel costs b/c it's desperate.
 
if I were Stanford and Cal I’d take a Big Ten offer no matter what

ACC doesn’t work logistically
I’m all for it. Great academic add and the existing members shouldn’t have to play a top 20 team every week. It’s great to add premier programs but there needs to be a little balance, too
 
Of course Cockeye's relative viewership benefits when you remove Ohio State and Michigan because they always have cushy schedules and rarely play those two. The B1G wants to feature marquee brand matchups more and that's why Nebraska plays OSU and UM so often. A game with Cockeye, by definition, is not a marquee matchup.
#facts
 
Last edited:
Ohio St snd Nichigan have almost as many varsity sports as Stanford
 
Last edited:
As long as they do well before they leave. If they leave after sucking 3 years in a row we'll have to listen to the SEC douchebags about how they ran to an easier conference. No offense @Dawgsauce
Also, If Trashbo doesn't get fired please take em. If he gets fired, please still take Pay$M. Little too cultish for my taste.
 
They're weird people for sure.
bloomfield hills wtf GIF
 
from one my daily emails from The Athletic

This prediction makes sense

It’s kinda all about football, but it’s really all about money, as Chris Vannini wrote yesterday. It’s just going to be a mess. The Big Ten’s coast-to-coast logistics will be a nightmare, even for bigger sports like basketball, where coaches have “zero clue” how it’ll all work.

How does this all end? I think football ends up in its own entity, separate from other varsity sports at each school, playing in its own tournament and abiding by its own rules. It’ll still make gobs of money, but it will feel more hollow.

P.S. I thought this piece on Arizona’s role in the Pac-12 disintegration was great, mainly for the dynamite quote from Arizona president Robert Robbins comparing the conference’s proposed Apple media rights deal to “selling candy bars for little leagues.”
 
How does this all end? I think football ends up in its own entity, separate from other varsity sports at each school, playing in its own tournament and abiding by its own rules. It’ll still make gobs of money, but it will feel more hollow.
Completely agree with this, and I've been saying it for a while. It's the ONLY outcome that makes sense within the constraints of college sports.
 
Completely agree with this, and I've been saying it for a while. It's the ONLY outcome that makes sense within the constraints of college sports.
Certainly for the B1G and the Big 12. SEC can likely survive as a home for all sports as it is geographically compact.

Adding Cal & Stanford would help create some geographical balance in the B1G that actually might help with scheduling sports other than football.
 
Back
Top