New DC Hot Board | The Platinum Board

New DC Hot Board

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

New DC Hot Board

jaihawk

Wide Receiver
Elite Member
Messages
2,295
Likes
8,218

Names of Interest — No inside info. Just listened to HuskerGarrett talk about this. Thoughts? Any other names?


Here’s a quick summary of what’s publicly known about each of these elite defensive-coordinator candidates from the world of cartoons — their background, roles, and some highlights.




Bugs Bunny


Background
– Former multi-sport collegiate legend at “What’s Up Doc University.”
– Known for world-class misdirection: fakes, traps, and confusing opponents until they literally run off a cliff.


Strengths
– Elite at disguising coverages; nobody reads a play until he says “Of course you realize… THIS means war.”
– Consistent success slowing down Run-First Teams, especially Elmer Fudd.
– Proven ability to create turnovers: opponents often drop the ball while yelling “YIPE!”


Concerns
– Might draw too many unsportsmanlike conduct flags for bringing dynamite onto the field.




SpongeBob SquarePants


Background
– Former fry cook at the Krusty Krab turned defensive savant.
– Creator of the “Bubble Zone” defense.


Strengths
– High-motor guy. Literally never gets tired.
– Energy infectious — players buy into whatever scheme he yells excitedly.
– Mentored under Coach Eugene Krabs (specializes in strip sacks).


Concerns
– Absorbs hits well but is extremely flammable when near heat lamps.




Batman (The Animated Series Version)


Background
– Billionaire vigilante with elite film-study habits.
– Has been operating a one-man 3–3–5 for decades.


Strengths
– Best situational play-caller in the business.
– Uses analytics from the Bat-Computer (“Team is 87% likely to run power on 3rd and 2”).
– Amazing at halftime adjustments: disappears mid-interview and magically appears in the booth.


Concerns
– Too many late-night scouting sessions; might need day games only.




Scooby-Doo


Background
– Safety-turned-sleuth who specializes in solving why the defense blew coverage.
– Loves blitz packages almost as much as Scooby Snacks.


Strengths
– Terrific at sniffing out trick plays.
– Gets his unit to “gang tackle,” usually by everyone panicking and running in the same direction.
– Offenses literally run away from him yelling “Ruh-roh!”


Concerns
– May refuse to coach in haunted stadiums (Rutgers, Northwestern).




Optimus Prime


Background
– Former commander of the Autobots; responsible for shutting down Decepticon offenses across the galaxy.
– Transforms his defensive fronts seamlessly: 4–2–5, 3–3–5, and occasionally an 18-wheeler.


Strengths
– Leadership off the charts. Entire defense chants “Roll out!” before every series.
– Never loses gap integrity. Ever.
– Turns undersized walk-ons into 6’5” cybernetic edge rushers (would help depth).


Concerns
– Uses too many timeouts transforming on the field.




Perry the Platypus


Background
– Mild-mannered mascot by day, elite secret-agent DC by night.
– Specializes in stopping overly complicated offenses invented by Doofenshmirtz.


Strengths
– Covert disguises: offense never knows where pressure comes from.
– Master of turnovers — picks off passes using gadgets that are somehow NCAA-legal.
– Leaves no film trail; no one knows what his scheme is.


Concerns
– Refuses to wear a headset. Communicates with chirps.




Master Splinter


Background
– Famed sensei who took four mutant teenagers from raw talent to disciplined ninjas.
– Has seen every offensive philosophy since the 1980s.


Strengths
– Elite player development — especially linebackers named after Renaissance artists.
– Preaches gap discipline and pizza-fueled effort.
– Great in rivalry games; never loses to teams coached by someone named “Shredder.”


Concerns
– Might demand that the defensive line lives in the sewer for “focus.”




Most Realistic Fits for Nebraska Football


  1. Batman – film-study king; instantly improves 3rd-down defense
  2. Optimus Prime – physicality through the roof
  3. Bugs Bunny – elite schemer; Big Ten West vibes
  4. Master Splinter – player-development god
  5. SpongeBob – locker-room glue guy
  6. Perry the Platypus – pure chaos, but successful
  7. Scooby-Doo – vibes immaculate, run fits questionable
 
Score You Win GIF
 
Bugs Bunny is overrated. Gimme Batman, Optimus, or Splinter tho. Excellent track records.

Here's what Dean's team over at On3 had to say...

🌽 RedStorm94


Honestly? I don’t hate this list. Bugs Bunny has more creativity in one ear than our last three DCs combined. The misdirection alone would confuse half the Big Ten. And Batman? Dude hasn’t missed a read since 1992. Give him the black polo and let’s roll.




🌽 BigRedOptimist


I’ve been saying for YEARS we need an outside-the-box hire, and you all laughed at me. Now look — Optimus Prime runs a better 3–4 than half the conference. This is how we get back. Innovation. Vision. Robot semi-trucks collapsing the pocket. I’m ALL IN.




🌽 FrostWarning


This is why we can’t have nice things. SpongeBob? Really? Have you WATCHED him try to lift weights? Terrible pad level. Zero leverage. Guy folds in half every time he gets hit by a jellyfish. Hard pass.




🌽 TunnelWalkTruthSeeker


Batman is overrated. Yeah, he’s got all the gadgets, but the guy refuses to work daytime games. You KNOW the Big Ten is gonna schedule us for 11 a.m. kickoffs just to spite us. His entire scheme falls apart in sunlight.




🌽 Huskermathguy


Everyone gets excited about Scooby-Doo because he “sniffs out trick plays.” Folks, he’s literally scared of his own shadow. Put him in a whiteout at Penn State and he'll be hiding behind the bench by the second series. Worst fit on the list.




🌽 1995BlackshirtsOrBust


No. NO. Master Splinter is a culture builder but he lets KEVIN — a literal RAT — call signals half the time. That’s not Blackshirt football. Until someone shows me how a ninja-turtle-based defense stops Ohio State’s receivers, I’m out.
 
I think we go out on a limb and grab a true wild card like Peter Griffin. He'd draw up some innovative stuff
 
I'd like to add @Cavalot to the Hot Board - he has 27 years DC Experience and I think he'd be a great fit. Reads a room very well.
 
I'd like to add @Cavalot to the Hot Board - he has 27 years DC Experience and I think he'd be a great fit. Reads a room very well.

Nice — I searched the public parts of tPB for posts by Cavalot and pulled together an evidence-based breakdown of why (and why not) he’d be a good candidate for Nebraska’s Defensive Coordinator job. I used only publicly visible pages on The Platinum Board. Below are the key findings, a strengths/weaknesses summary, and a short “hireability” verdict.




Quick sourcing (public pages I used)​


  • Cavalot member page (public profile). The Platinum Board
  • Thread where Cavalot kicked off a “DC Candidates” list / posted a summary of names & quick analyses. The Platinum Board
  • Recent game thread started by Cavalot showing active engagement and thread-starting behavior. The Platinum Board
  • Thread where Cavalot posted an AI-generated roundup about Matt Rhule (and the forum reaction). Useful for showing his summarization approach and reception. The Platinum Board+1
  • Thread about “Better Use of AI for this Site” where Cavalot summarized/curated content (shows pattern). The Platinum Board



Evidence summary (what the public posts show)​


  1. Active, visible forum presence. Cavalot starts threads, posts summaries and polls, and interacts with other high-profile posters — he’s not a lurker. (see member page and multiple thread starts). The Platinum Board+1
  2. Analytical / synthesis behavior. He posts lists of candidate names and short breakdowns (e.g., “DC Candidates” post listing Leonhard, Wilcox, Knowles, Rossi, Simmons and adding context). That indicates he can gather publicly available info and produce structured analysis. The Platinum Board
  3. Comfort using tools (AI) to summarize and synthesize — he’s posted AI-generated roundups and defended that approach, showing he knows how to gather and compress lots of media into consumable format. Forum reaction shows this is a visible pattern. The Platinum Board+1
  4. Community engagement and credibility within tPB. He’s trusted enough to start high-visibility threads and run recurring polls/threads that attract replies — a sign he can lead fan conversation and marshal attention. The Platinum Board+1
  5. Focus on practical discussion topics (recruiting, game management, staff names). His posts show he follows coaching hires, recruiting, and game threads rather than just memes — useful background for football operations analysis. The Platinum Board+1



Strengths that would translate​


(Meaning: skills shown on the board that are relevant to the job in a conceptual way — not proof of coaching experience.)


  • Tactical researcher & synthesizer. He can gather info on coaches, distill attributes, and compare candidates — useful for game-planning research and opponent study. The Platinum Board
  • Communication & leadership. Frequent thread starts and curated summaries show he can organize information and communicate it clearly — useful in communicating schemes to players/staff. The Platinum Board+1
  • Data-minded / tool-friendly. Use of AI to summarize coverage suggests he’s willing to use modern tools for scouting and analysis (film tags, analytics feeds, etc.). The Platinum Board+1
  • Fan/Booster-savvy. He knows the fanbase language and narrative dynamics — could help with managing booster relations and public messaging if needed. The Platinum Board



Critical weaknesses / red flags for actual hiring as Defensive Coordinator​


(These are decisive — a university DC needs these that the forum evidence does not show.)


  • No public evidence of coaching experience or résumé. Nothing on the public tPB pages shows Cavalot holding coaching titles, coordinating a defense at the college level, or leading position groups. Being a forum analyst is not the same as leading on-field coaching. (No hireable coach résumé observed on public posts.) The Platinum Board
  • Forum reputation risk & style. Some posts (e.g., heavy AI summaries, recurring memes) drew negative reactions; forum credibility doesn’t necessarily translate to locker-room credibility with players and staff. Critics on tPB called some posts “lazy” or unoriginal — a potential reputational drag. The Platinum Board+1
  • Unverified claims / hearsay. Posts are fan-community discussion, often mixing rumor and opinion. Hiring on the basis of forum presence risks acting on unverified or biased signals. The Platinum Board
  • No evidence of recruiting, practice planning, or X-and-O implementation. A DC must demonstrate play-call success, practice curriculum, player development results, in-game adjustments — none of which are visible in public tPB posts. The Platinum Board



Short “hireability” verdict (if this were a real DC hire)​


  • As a real, on-field Defensive Coordinator at Nebraska: Not a viable candidate based on public tPB evidence. There’s no sign of the necessary coaching track record, on-field experience, recruiting chops, or institutional vetting. The posts show analysis skill and community influence — but not coaching credentials. (This is the critical hiring standard.) The Platinum Board+1
  • As an analyst / media-adjacent adviser / community liaison: Potentially a good fit. His strengths in synthesis, communications, and fanbase reach could make him useful as a media or fan-engagement advisor, content curator, or analyst — roles that lean on the very skills he displays publicly. The Platinum Board+1



Concrete examples (pulling from public posts) — what supports the above​


  • DC candidate list + summaries (analytical work): He provided structured candidate lists and commentary, showing he can research and compare coaches. That supports the “tactical researcher” strength. The Platinum Board
  • AI-generated roundups / summarization (tool use): He posted AI summaries of coach rumors and defended AI use — showing his willingness to use tools for rapid synthesis. Forum reaction also shows limitations (some community pushback). The Platinum Board+1
  • Active thread starter & poll creator (community leadership): Multiple recent thread starts (game threads, polls) show he gets engagement and can marshal discussions. The Platinum Board+1
 
Back
Top