Both.... there is chatter going on and he refers to Ek in the past tense in that video.I provided two options and you said yes. So I assume at this point you are trolling.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both.... there is chatter going on and he refers to Ek in the past tense in that video.I provided two options and you said yes. So I assume at this point you are trolling.
I can't whole heartedly dispute any of that.I am sorry, I get this is a big accomplishment....... but the failures of other coaches doesn't make this some resounding accomplishment.
Somebody needs to tell the person who writes the checks this.
See this lost its standing with me........
The easy answer to this is look at Indiana.
But I will say, I was fine with the building it the long way. My problems came in week 1 vs Minnesota where we saw coaching incompetence. Stuff that was not related to get better players, but simple strategy of the game was failing.
You can get better players, but if you can't manage a game it doesn't matter.
Pelini was way better than Rhule.I can't whole heartedly dispute any of that.
Failures of the past have led to where we are now. Doesn't excuse Rhule's mistakes or lack of consistency within the program but his bowl appearances, while not resounding accomplishments, are still better than the norm over the past 15 years.
Indiana is a Unicorn. And it remains to be seen as to how long the dominance will last. Bottom line is Cignetti is a better coach then Rhule and perhaps everyone else coaching at the D1 level. Unless we are going to get him to come to NU... we might as well stay the course for just a bit longer. We know from the past that jumping ship from one coach to another has not boded well for NU.
Remember when we used to make fun of him for only winning 9 games a year. Good times...Pelini was way better than Rhule.
He atleast took care of Minnesota and Cockeye most years. I’m one of those negative posters who isn’t rational for being down on Rhule even though Fleck and Kirk run circles around him coaching wise.Remember when we used to make fun of him for only winning 9 games a year. Good times...
The press conference of him trying to paint the season as progress with back to back bowl games and then jumping down a reporters neck for even saying the word “reset” was pretty hilarious . Especially when they’re bringing in 20 transfers and 2 new coordinators LOLYear 4 will be interesting. Rhule has been selling he slowly builds via developing younger players. We seem to need a lot of key transfers to start in year 4. Not sure what the pivot will be. Seems it has been we’ve been bad forever and went to back to back bowl games as the proof of concept.
Bo at least had the conviction to do what he believed in.Pelini was way better than Rhule.
I know a guy who played under Prince at K-State and was a GA under Snyder. I asked him what the main differences were between the two. He said Snyder followed his process no matter how things were going. He said if shit when sideways a little under Prince he was always changing things up.Bo at least had the conviction to do what he believed in.
Rhule changes with the wind anymore.
Snyder was in his 240th year. Prince 1st-3rd.I know a guy who played under Prince at K-State and was a GA under Snyder. I asked him what the main differences were between the two. He said Snyder followed his process no matter how things were going. He said if shit when sideways a little under Prince he was always changing things up.
I’ve heard the same things about Osborne. He also said Snyder was the most secretive person with his staff too. Snyder was a different cat.Snyder was in his 240th year. Prince 1st-3rd.
Think there's times to change and times to stick to the process. By nature though those two would be at both ends of the spectrum.
Rhule isn’t a first time HC.Snyder was in his 240th year. Prince 1st-3rd.
Think there's times to change and times to stick to the process. By nature though those two would be at both ends of the spectrum.