- Messages
- 37,669
- Likes
- 68,732
I mean, I was more correct than you were.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!I mean, I was more correct than you were.
No you weren't. He was a 3 star when we started recruiting him just like I said. Doesn't get more righter than that.I mean, I was more correct than you were.
Nah, he wasn't ranked. First ranking was 4* top 100 'cording to rivals' chartNo you weren't. He was a 3 star when we started recruiting him just like I said. Doesn't get more righter than that.
You just saw the ranking history from 247.Nah, he wasn't ranked. First ranking was 4* top 100 'cording to rivals' chart
247 doesn't matter.You just saw the ranking history from 247.
247 doesn't matter.
Interesting - unranked August before his signing day and top 100 on signing day. Why, reading some of the posts on our board, I would have concluded that if a player was unrated in June before signing day he was a POS!Looking at rivals their chart shows him going from unranked straight to top 100 if I'm reading it right
Wasn’t he an academic concern? I feel like a I remember rivals thinking that he wouldn’t qualify and therefore they didn’t have him ranked, but they acknowledged that he was very talented.Interesting - unranked August before his signing day and top 100 on signing day. Why, reading some of the posts on our board, I would have concluded that if a player was unrated in June before signing day he was a POS!
I don't think so. I think it was more that he was 5'3" 120 lbs and played at a smaller school. They didn't rank him until he came to camps.Wasn’t he an academic concern? I feel like a I remember rivals thinking that he wouldn’t qualify and therefore they didn’t have him ranked, but they acknowledged that he was very talented.