POLL How disappointed are you that as of 11/21 we have no HC signed and have to wait until after cockeye for a Kansas coach? (1 Viewer)

[ChocaEgg]

On a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being 'This is fine' and 10 being 'nearly suicidal', rate your disappointment.

 

[Herbie]

Big Klieman fan

 

[Juro]

 

[ChocaEgg]

Big Klieman fan

 

[Bootleg11]

Unless it's Klieman, Deion or Monken you figure they'll announce no later than 7 days from today right?

I'm excited to hear who the new hire is. There are some hires that will give me pause but there's no way it can be worse than what we've suffered through these last 5 years.

 

[DrinkItIn]

10: LL
6: Klieman

 

[doublewing]

Not disappointed at all. I had no expectations of having a HC by now based on how most every coaching search works. It may not even be until after conference championship weekend. I'll save judgment until we announce the coach. I don't see any need to jump to negative or positive conclusions at this point.

I also don't get caught up in the rumors or speculation. Most of what comes out during these searches is BS.

 

[Faux Sean Callahan]

I am not disappointed with the timing provided we get the right coach. Was really hoping we would get Rhule, but is what it is.

Realistically the only coaches we could have announced right now are the ones who are unemployed or interns...

After Cockeye it likely opens up to guys who aren't in conference championship games and then after that next weekend it opens up to everybody else.

 

[Boondock_St_Sker]

Just want the fucker hired…whoever the fucker is.

EDIT:

 

[2010sarenevercoming]

I think CK & LL are both good coaches. Also doubt either of them is the hire.

Really was hoping for some more concrete leaks or an earlier official announcement after the season tanked, but a couple months full of mostly-empty speculation was par for the course.

 

[Faux Sean Callahan]

Big Klieman fan

Wouldn't be sexy, but would be a good fit and could do worse.

 

[HCFord1]

If we're hiring Leipold then it's about an 8, Klieman would be a 5 because honestly it seems like that guy can coach his dick off.

 

[Turn Down for What]

Big Klieman fan

Nothing like settling for your sixth option.

gbr

 

[Turn Down for What]

Wouldn't be sexy, but would be a good fit and could do worse.

"It could've been worse."

The Nebraska way.

 

[HCFord1]

If we're hiring Leipold then it's about an 8, Klieman would be a 5 because honestly it seems like that guy can coach his dick off.

Also, mark down Klieman as yet another thing that @BIG TONE SOPRANO was right about a year before anyone else.

 

[Herbie]

Let’s be serious for a moment — Klieman is pretty much best case scenario for Nebraska.

Most big names were pipedreams. If I’m Stoops, Lane; Rhule*, Gundy, etc. I’m not coming to Nebraska for 10 mil if my current schools willing to pay me 8 mil.

 

[Faux Sean Callahan]

Nothing like settling for your sixth option.

gbr

He isn't that low on Turd's board.

He might be on yours, but he is viewed as a good coach.

 

[slattimer]

You didn’t include bigly. I’m bigly @disappoint

 

[HCFord1]

"It could've been worse."

The Nebraska way.

Would you be unhappy with the team that Klieman has put together at a school with fewer advantages than Nebraska?

 

[Turn Down for What]

He isn't that low on Turd's board.

He might be on yours, but he is viewed as a good coach.

You think other BIG time programs would go after him? Of course not.

This is Nebraska being stale and boring and putting a ceiling on a program.

Their logical has been stuck in the 90's ever since.......... the 90's.