- Messages
- 4,937
- Likes
- 17,144
Statistically Sims was literally twice as likely to turn it over on a given snapHe was just as bad at sims in turnovers lol. It’s actually incredible how fucking incompetent at QB we were last year
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!Statistically Sims was literally twice as likely to turn it over on a given snapHe was just as bad at sims in turnovers lol. It’s actually incredible how fucking incompetent at QB we were last year
Yeah, but skersker has twice the hard-on on hating HH for everything, so it balances itself out.Statistically Sims was literally twice as likely to turn it over on a given snap
I did a whole analysis on it last year because so many people were saying they were equivalent. It's not even an argument for HH, he was one of the worst QBs in football last year, but Sims was nonetheless far worse.Yeah, but skersker has twice the hard-on on hating HH for everything, so it balances itself out.
I did a whole analysis on it last year because so many people were saying they were equivalent. It's not even an argument for HH, he was one of the worst QBs in football last year, but Sims was nonetheless far worse.
TLDR: Sims has turnovers on ~6.5% of snaps at NU, HH on ~3% of snaps.
Sims
Pass efficiency rating: 99.6 (https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jeff-sims-1.html)
Record as starter: 0-2
Sims turnovers: 7 (4 INT, 3 fumbles lost)
Games played: 2
Turnovers per game: 3.5
Total snaps: 108
Turnovers per snap: 0.0648
Haarberg
Pass efficiency rating: 120.6 (https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/heinrich-haarberg-1.html) -- (not updated yet for Michigan St game)
Record as...
- Mavsker
- Replies: 21
- Forum: The Platinum Board
If last year was any indication, it’s probably a bad sign that Rhule is already saying that DK could be a future pro.
If last year was any indication, it’s probably a bad sign that Rhule is already saying that DK could be a future pro.
I mean I’ll dox myself if it’s necessary to prove I’m not that retard. And I mean if a top 150 recruit doesn’t crack the rotation by the end of their sophomore year (I can’t see Coleman doing) I’d imagine almost all of them would transfer, have you not paid attention to college football recently??Yes, you and Juan (who are definitely not the same person) were both right about Coleman. It’s been proven that if you aren’t in the top WR rotation by the beginning of your true sophomore year then you’re a bust. It’s all over, I mean after all he was on the bike yesterday.
Second best statistical analysis ever done on this board after that one guy's critically acclaimed Scrote StatsI did a whole analysis on it last year because so many people were saying they were equivalent. It's not even an argument for HH, he was one of the worst QBs in football last year, but Sims was nonetheless far worse.
TLDR: Sims has turnovers on ~6.5% of snaps at NU, HH on ~3% of snaps.
Sims
Pass efficiency rating: 99.6 (https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jeff-sims-1.html)
Record as starter: 0-2
Sims turnovers: 7 (4 INT, 3 fumbles lost)
Games played: 2
Turnovers per game: 3.5
Total snaps: 108
Turnovers per snap: 0.0648
Haarberg
Pass efficiency rating: 120.6 (https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/heinrich-haarberg-1.html) -- (not updated yet for Michigan St game)
Record as...
- Mavsker
- Replies: 21
- Forum: The Platinum Board
If this is the criteria I'm not sure what the problem is. He had the 3rd most snaps at WR as a freshman. I'd say that's "cracking the rotation".And I mean if a top 150 recruit doesn’t crack the rotation by the end of their sophomore year (I can’t see Coleman doing)
Once again, he only played because of injuries and the coaches knew he wasn’t ready so they went and got 2 players with very similar measurable to him in the portal. Writings on the wall that he won’t play much this year, if you can’t see that then I can’t help you.If this is the criteria I'm not sure what the problem is. He had the 3rd most snaps at WR as a freshman. I'd say that's "cracking the rotation".
Once again, he only played because of injuries and the coaches knew he wasn’t ready so they went and got 2 players with very similar measurable to him in the portal. Writings on the wall that he won’t play much this year, if you can’t see that then I can’t help you.
It's an indictment of Malachi if the coaches pursue multiple tall, fast WRs? Do I have that right?Once again, he only played because of injuries and the coaches knew he wasn’t ready so they went and got 2 players with very similar measurable to him in the portal. Writings on the wall that he won’t play much this year, if you can’t see that then I can’t help you.
That's exactly what he said.It's an indictment of Malachi if the coaches pursue multiple tall, fast WRs? Do I have that right?
You can’t see him cracking the rotation? Did he fvck your girlfriend or something?I mean I’ll dox myself if it’s necessary to prove I’m not that retard. And I mean if a top 150 recruit doesn’t crack the rotation by the end of their sophomore year (I can’t see Coleman doing) I’d imagine almost all of them would transfer, have you not paid attention to college football recently??
You can only play one of them at a time. I don’t make the rules.It's an indictment of Malachi if the coaches pursue multiple tall, fast WRs? Do I have that right?