- Messages
- 7,169
- Likes
- 23,660
With Rouse’s commitment at an extreme position of need, your OL look like this:
Rouse
Nouili
Scott
Corcoran
Teddy Pro
A few things here:
1) Rouse has started over 30(?) games at LT. He will be this team’s LT.
2) Teddy Pro played RT throughout high school from my understanding as his QB was left handed. So he’s not learning from scratch. A guy that athletic can figure it out.
All of a sudden, we have a lot of options at OL and something that looks like depth.
Some in this thread originally and for some odd reason took exception to the idea that I said that I don’t think there’s a reason Rhule shouldn't win 6 games. That’s not me placing any unrealistic expectations on a new coach because I am mad the last guy got fired. Looking at it on paper, I still don’t think that even without Rouse you should be any worse than 6 wins. If Casey doesn’t get hurt last year the 2022 team probably accomplishes that. My statement was more about being optimistic that the 2023 Huskers SHOULD be a bowl team.
With the addition of Rouse, I think you can probably say that the over/under win total for 2023 should be placed at 6.5.
If we can’t expect this team to go bowling with 8(?) P5 experienced OL, 2 QBs with 20 starts a piece to their name, 2 experienced RBs, 3 (4 with Betts) experienced WRs who all have caught passes at the P5 level…….?
What more do we need then? If we can’t say this team wins 6 what more needs to happen before we can place some extremely low expectations on the 2023 team?
Calling it now… 8 wins and Matt Rhule shows us in Year 1 that it’s not that hard to have an okay team at Nebraska.
************
Hi gentlemen. With the addition of Ben Scott late last week it got me thinking and asking some people around about the starting OL for 2023.
The most popular idea was that Nebraska wasn’t done adding to its OL for the 2023 season and the starting RT will come from the portal. This isn’t an outlandish idea, but I question the probably of Nebraska being able to go portaling and landing a starting Big Ten tackle. I just don’t see that happening. It took an almost perfect situation for us to land the center we did.
My thought is that we are done adding to the OL for the 2023 season and I’m okay with that to be honest. Here’s why…
I believe the starting OL will look like this:
LT - Teddy Pro (6)
LG - Nouili (10)
C - Ben Scott (30)
RG - Lutovsky (5)
RT - Corcoran (25)
The numbers in parenthesis represent number of P5 starts. Mind you; those are rough numbers and I wasn’t going to go through and find the exact numbers. Further, Nouili started at Colorado St one year and I didn’t count those games. Should those count? Probably some way and somehow. But I didn’t put them in. Also, Luto didn’t start many games, but he played a ton. Do those snaps he got not count because they weren’t the first ones of the game?
Over 70 combined starts for our OL is a ton of experience coming back. Likely the most we’ve had in a very long time.
With the work that @slattimer has done breaking down our most likely offensive identity (those are premium articles and I encourage those who have not to subscribe and read), I am kind of excited about a group that looks like that. I think by week 3 or 4 that we should look pretty good when we run our core running and passing plays.
I’m okay with the idea of adding another OL from the portal, but I’m not sure that person is going to be there. I’d also like to get out of the business of portaling for multiple OL/DL starters per year as well. That’s not to say I wouldn’t agree with it from time to time; I’d like see us manufacture those types of positions ourselves.
I know that many have said Rhule’s first year at other places is always terrible and that point isn’t lost on me. What id say is with 70 combined starts coming back on OL and two multi year starting QBs on your roster, there’s almost no good reason for Rhule to not go bowling in year one.
Rouse
Nouili
Scott
Corcoran
Teddy Pro
A few things here:
1) Rouse has started over 30(?) games at LT. He will be this team’s LT.
2) Teddy Pro played RT throughout high school from my understanding as his QB was left handed. So he’s not learning from scratch. A guy that athletic can figure it out.
All of a sudden, we have a lot of options at OL and something that looks like depth.
Some in this thread originally and for some odd reason took exception to the idea that I said that I don’t think there’s a reason Rhule shouldn't win 6 games. That’s not me placing any unrealistic expectations on a new coach because I am mad the last guy got fired. Looking at it on paper, I still don’t think that even without Rouse you should be any worse than 6 wins. If Casey doesn’t get hurt last year the 2022 team probably accomplishes that. My statement was more about being optimistic that the 2023 Huskers SHOULD be a bowl team.
With the addition of Rouse, I think you can probably say that the over/under win total for 2023 should be placed at 6.5.
If we can’t expect this team to go bowling with 8(?) P5 experienced OL, 2 QBs with 20 starts a piece to their name, 2 experienced RBs, 3 (4 with Betts) experienced WRs who all have caught passes at the P5 level…….?
What more do we need then? If we can’t say this team wins 6 what more needs to happen before we can place some extremely low expectations on the 2023 team?
Calling it now… 8 wins and Matt Rhule shows us in Year 1 that it’s not that hard to have an okay team at Nebraska.
************
Hi gentlemen. With the addition of Ben Scott late last week it got me thinking and asking some people around about the starting OL for 2023.
The most popular idea was that Nebraska wasn’t done adding to its OL for the 2023 season and the starting RT will come from the portal. This isn’t an outlandish idea, but I question the probably of Nebraska being able to go portaling and landing a starting Big Ten tackle. I just don’t see that happening. It took an almost perfect situation for us to land the center we did.
My thought is that we are done adding to the OL for the 2023 season and I’m okay with that to be honest. Here’s why…
I believe the starting OL will look like this:
LT - Teddy Pro (6)
LG - Nouili (10)
C - Ben Scott (30)
RG - Lutovsky (5)
RT - Corcoran (25)
The numbers in parenthesis represent number of P5 starts. Mind you; those are rough numbers and I wasn’t going to go through and find the exact numbers. Further, Nouili started at Colorado St one year and I didn’t count those games. Should those count? Probably some way and somehow. But I didn’t put them in. Also, Luto didn’t start many games, but he played a ton. Do those snaps he got not count because they weren’t the first ones of the game?
Over 70 combined starts for our OL is a ton of experience coming back. Likely the most we’ve had in a very long time.
With the work that @slattimer has done breaking down our most likely offensive identity (those are premium articles and I encourage those who have not to subscribe and read), I am kind of excited about a group that looks like that. I think by week 3 or 4 that we should look pretty good when we run our core running and passing plays.
I’m okay with the idea of adding another OL from the portal, but I’m not sure that person is going to be there. I’d also like to get out of the business of portaling for multiple OL/DL starters per year as well. That’s not to say I wouldn’t agree with it from time to time; I’d like see us manufacture those types of positions ourselves.
I know that many have said Rhule’s first year at other places is always terrible and that point isn’t lost on me. What id say is with 70 combined starts coming back on OL and two multi year starting QBs on your roster, there’s almost no good reason for Rhule to not go bowling in year one.
Last edited: