He's right, that's not considered "film". Film isn't a 100% completion and 80% of throws are TDs.![]()
You love it when people call a collection of plays put together, aka film, "film"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's right, that's not considered "film". Film isn't a 100% completion and 80% of throws are TDs.![]()
You love it when people call a collection of plays put together, aka film, "film"?
30% seems a bit dramatic. While he would be making a huge jump in competition, the talent surrounding him would also equally increase.Sure, but I think that you need to reduce the positive stats by 30% and increase the negative stats by 30%, and that might be a relatively good predictor of P4 stats. Going from D2 to P4 D1 is a significant jump.
That was sarcasmSure, but I think that you need to reduce the positive stats by 30% and increase the negative stats by 30%, and that might be a relatively good predictor of P4 stats. Going from D2 to P4 D1 is a significant jump.
Most of those kids don’t think about the degree. They want to play and get to the league. I even heard kids at UNK say I’m going to the league. A lot of them think they are way better than they are. Programs will find a way to get rid of dead weight. The only players who use to stick around when they knew they weren’t going to play was the walkons because it was their dream to put on a Husker Jersey and run out of the tunnel. That’s long gone.Why? Most of those you want to go realize that they are never going to start for a P4 school. But here they are, able to use the equipment, get some free meals, and be apart of the UNL football team. (And stand on the sidelines in Lincoln for every game.) Meanwhile they are getting a degree from a B10 school whose diplomas mean something. Under the new rules they aslo get some marginal benefits besides the ones that walk-ons used to get. Most aren't going to leave unless they are confident they can start somewhere else, and that the degree they will acquire will be as advantageous as the one from UNL.
so Maverick Noonan would or would not free up a scholarship spot on the 105? I was not nearly as confused as I now am on all of this after reading this thread lol
Maybe, but a lot of folks appreciated what Gronowski did this season and he was a 70% reduction in TDs and a 0% increase in interceptions over the mean. Average TD:INT at FCS was 13:3, at Cockeye it was 4:3.30% seems a bit dramatic. While he would be making a huge jump in competition, the talent surrounding him would also equally increase.
I would be completely onboard with bringing in a guy like this and Minchey. That to me would be ideal (assuming that we are not wanting to spend the big money for a QB in the portal).
You forgot to consider the Kirk Ferentz effect in your equation.Maybe, but a lot of folks appreciated what Gronowski did this season and he was a 70% reduction in TDs and a 0% increase in interceptions over the mean. Average TD:INT at FCS was 13:3, at Cockeye it was 4:3.
I've seen this before on message boards. There is a subset of people who get really upset for some reason if you call a highlight video "film." They define "film" as video of a complete game and get really irritated by anyone else that doesn't go by that definition.![]()
You love it when people call a collection of plays put together, aka film, "film"?
That's why I didn't consider yards or completion percentage.You forgot to consider the Kirk Ferentz effect in your equation.
Pretty weird take/argument from these subset of people. It is a highlight tape but it’s sure as hell is still considered film. Doesn’t need to be an all 22 cut up to be called film😂 but hey we’re all entitled to our own opinion so to each his own.I've seen this before on message boards. There is a subset of people who get really upset for some reason if you call a highlight video "film." They define "film" as video of a complete game and get really irritated by anyone else that doesn't go by that definition.
It's not a subset on a message board, it's anyone who is involved in the game. I'm not bent out of shape about it, but I'm also not going to consider whether I would offer a kid based on a highlight package.I've seen this before on message boards. There is a subset of people who get really upset for some reason if you call a highlight video "film." They define "film" as video of a complete game and get really irritated by anyone else that doesn't go by that definition.
You shouldn't even consider it at all. Cockeye's offense has to be the least QB-friendly system in all of FBS.That's why I didn't consider yards or completion percentage.
Aiden Chiles come on downGive me Jeff Sinns 2 please
So use the #1 pick in the NFL draft as the baseline comp for QBs moving up a level?You shouldn't even consider it at all. Cockeye's offense has to be the least QB-friendly system in all of FBS.
Why not look at Cam Ward as your example? See - it goes both ways.
I've seen this before on message boards. There is a subset of people who get really upset for some reason if you call a highlight video "film." They define "film" as video of a complete game and get really irritated by anyone else that doesn't go by that definition.
I don't care if you care, tbh. I don't care what you call it. I'm just not going to judge a kid off a highlight video. Every play on those should be impressive.Also pretty strong contingent that don’t give a fuck about that shit
Maybe you should start listening to some Twitter personality 😉I don't buy what some Twitter personality says as gospel at this point but as a poverty program with no interest in winning at a high level that course of action seems mostly likely
I don't care if you care, tbh. I don't care what you call it. I'm just not going to judge a kid off a highlight video. Every play on those should be impressive.