If it was even possible to install a new offense @God is a Husker and I would be out doing car washes to raise money for Paul Johnson #RTDB
We are a Nebraska Husker fan community. Please either login or register for an account
If it was even possible to install a new offense @God is a Husker and I would be out doing car washes to raise money for Paul Johnson #RTDB
Fighting for his annual 15 minutes of fame is all Shanle has. Of course, if we’d only gone with his choice of head coach who we’re playing on Saturday, everything would be so much better. 🙄View attachment 44561
Shanle crawled out of woodwork
Why does everyone think football is so hard? It blows me away.That’s awesome. But I don’t see it changing much for the season outlook.
But maybe they’ll scrap the screens and move a little faster
Yes, he thought it was a bad college hire because Rhule hadn't won at a high rate in the NFL.Didn't he hate the Rhule hire or was it someone else?
No wonder he's taking that stance!Yes, he thought it was a bad college hire because Rhule hadn't won at a high rate in the NFL.
We’re scoring 50 this week aren’t we?Lots of mouth breathers over complicating this.
Holgerson, though he belongs to the coaching tree of Mike Leach, is not an “air raid traditionalist” if there is such a thing.
Dana runs the ball more than most think, traditionally, and has done so well. The idea of him being an “air raid coach” is really just due to the concepts within the passing game, and not the act of throwing the ball 55 times per game.
We, and nearly everyone else in CFB, run a lot of air raid concepts already.
A lot of our current passing attack has these concepts built in.
- Mesh
- 4-Verticals
- All Hitches
- Y-Cross
- Y-Corner
- Y-Stick
- Y-Shallow
Satterfield was not bad at play design.
Satterfield is not a bad teacher.
Satterfield was not a bad game planner (at least until the defense adjusted.)
Satterfield was just atrociously bad at a few things:
That’s what Dana is here to do. Rhule/Satt gave him the playbook. His job is to look at who we have, and call the best game he can.
- Sequencing said concepts to keep the defense guessing.
- Sequencing said concepts in a logical order regarding down, distance, and game situation.
- Adjusting on the fly to counter what the defense was showing.
- Calling plays that would give our current personnel the best chance to be successful.
Let’s see how it goes.
MinimumWe’re scoring 50 this week aren’t we?
But Scott Shanle says this is insane!Lots of mouth breathers over complicating this.
Holgerson, though he belongs to the coaching tree of Mike Leach, is not an “air raid traditionalist” if there is such a thing.
Dana runs the ball more than most think, traditionally, and has done so well. The idea of him being an “air raid coach” is really just due to the concepts within the passing game, and not the act of throwing the ball 55 times per game.
We, and nearly everyone else in CFB, run a lot of air raid concepts already.
A lot of our current passing attack has these concepts built in.
- Mesh
- 4-Verticals
- All Hitches
- Y-Cross
- Y-Corner
- Y-Stick
- Y-Shallow
Satterfield was not bad at play design.
Satterfield is not a bad teacher.
Satterfield was not a bad game planner (at least until the defense adjusted.)
Satterfield was just atrociously bad at a few things:
That’s what Dana is here to do. Rhule/Satt gave him the playbook. His job is to look at who we have, and call the best game he can.
- Sequencing said concepts to keep the defense guessing.
- Sequencing said concepts in a logical order regarding down, distance, and game situation.
- Adjusting on the fly to counter what the defense was showing.
- Calling plays that would give our current personnel the best chance to be successful.
Let’s see how it goes.
Dude obviously has CTEYou'd think Shanle has been around long enough to realize they aren't dumping the scheme and verbiage and installing something completely new right now.
Lots of mouth breathers over complicating this.
Holgerson, though he belongs to the coaching tree of Mike Leach, is not an “air raid traditionalist” if there is such a thing.
Dana runs the ball more than most think, traditionally, and has done so well. The idea of him being an “air raid coach” is really just due to the concepts within the passing game, and not the act of throwing the ball 55 times per game.
We, and nearly everyone else in CFB, run a lot of air raid concepts already.
A lot of our current passing attack has these concepts built in.
- Mesh
- 4-Verticals
- All Hitches
- Y-Cross
- Y-Corner
- Y-Stick
- Y-Shallow
Satterfield was not bad at play design.
Satterfield is not a bad teacher.
Satterfield was not a bad game planner (at least until the defense adjusted.)
Satterfield was just atrociously bad at a few things:
That’s what Dana is here to do. Rhule/Satt gave him the playbook. His job is to look at who we have, and call the best game he can.
- Sequencing said concepts to keep the defense guessing.
- Sequencing said concepts in a logical order regarding down, distance, and game situation.
- Adjusting on the fly to counter what the defense was showing.
- Calling plays that would give our current personnel the best chance to be successful.
Let’s see how it goes.
View attachment 44561
Shanle crawled out of woodwork
I remember Amy Loid from college. Yikes!He’s been around long enough to have his brain devoured by amyloid.
I agree a change needed to be made. But so little time to make much impact in my opinion. If he can put together a better game plan, great.This was absolutely the right thing to do, for multiple reasons.
Our offense has been horrible. And getting worse. We've all seen that Satt can't weave together a coherent scheme of play calls. We've all seen square peg, round hole, enough from Satt. We've all seen our offense been incredibly predictable, where opposing DC's have had to be LOLing at how easy it is to know what play is coming almost all of the time.
Holgerson really looks to fit well in how we need to improve. There are many aspects to that, but it doesn't have to be complicated, either. Holgerson can utilize our playbook the players know, with our terminology (he is not an idiot and terminology is not going to be an issue), and the chances he is better than Satt at calling a cohesive, sensible, NOT so telegraphed game of play calling is extremely high.
Timing is huge on this IMO. We need the infusion of offensive coaching help/talent right now, Holgerson seems ready to get back into full time coaching now, and with the bye week and obvious need for changes our offense requires, the timing in all aspects works.
I am excited to see a competent, and historically top-notch, CFB play caller up in the booth for these last 3 games, and hopefully that means 4 games, as hopefully this is enough boost in a severe area of need where we can at the very least win ONE of our last 3 regular season games.
Nothing but good can come from this IMO. It needed to be done, had to be done, and an elite CFB OC was there, available and ready at the right time.
I agree a change needed to be made. But so little time to make much impact in my opinion. If he can put together a better game plan, great.
I hope this change succeeds in the short term and really hope it extends in to next year where we could really see results.
Not trying to be negative Nancy by any means. Just hoping it’s not too late for this year.
You can control a structure that you can use to use your theme wide or narrow.
You can control the layout of the forum list in a grid or ordinary listing style structure.
You can get rid of the crowded view in the forum by closing the sidebar.
You can make it more useful and easier to access by pinning the sidebar.
Color combinations are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.