Please, God - NO (Bronco Mendenhall) | Page 2 | The Platinum Board

Please, God - NO (Bronco Mendenhall)

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Please, God - NO (Bronco Mendenhall)

He's a discount Brian Harsin. He put up 8-5 seasons playing against mid-level G5 opponents. I don't know how you stunt for that body of work.
I wouldn't call it "stunting" lol

It's more indifference as these guys seem pretty interchangeable. Are we supposed to look at Toledo and Buffalo differently than BYU? Do Leipold and Klieman get extra credit because they were champion FCS/D3 HCs?

How are you breaking it down?
 
I wouldn't call it "stunting" lol

It's more indifference as these guys seem pretty interchangeable. Are we supposed to look at Toledo and Buffalo differently than BYU? Do Leipold and Klieman get extra credit because they were champion FCS/D3 HCs?

How are you breaking it down?

Leipold is the only one aside from Mendenhall that has a losing record as a P5 coach, and he took over the worst P5 team in the country and only has two seasons as a body of work. Justify why a below .500 P5 coach has a better resume than guys who aren't below .500 P5 coaches.
 
Leipold is the only one aside from Mendenhall that has a losing record as a P5 coach, and he took over the worst P5 team in the country and only has two seasons as a body of work. Justify why a below .500 P5 coach has a better resume than guys who aren't below .500 P5 coaches.
Because I'm looking at the entire body of work, not just P5 experience. That's what I meant when I said resume.

If we're looking at P5 only then you'd probably land on Doeren or Matt Campbell. I'd prefer Klieman out of that bunch but he has limited P5 experience/results as well.
 
I'd rather have Campbell or Mickey than Bronco. Disgusting that we're scraping the bottom of the barrel for a HC.
 
Because I'm looking at the entire body of work, not just P5 experience. That's what I meant when I said resume.

If we're looking at P5 only then you'd probably land on Doeren or Matt Campbell. I'd prefer Klieman out of that bunch but he has limited P5 experience/results as well.

Again, not really sure how 8-5 seasons in the Mountain West trump success at the P5 level. He wasn't really that impressive at a lower level of football, and BYU has more resources than most G5 programs.
 
Again, not really sure how 8-5 seasons in the Mountain West trump success at the P5 level. He wasn't really that impressive at a lower level of football, and BYU has more resources than most G5 programs.
He never went 8-5 in the Mountain West. He went 6-6, 11-2, 11-2, 10-3, 11-2, and 7-6 in the MWC. Then he was 10-3, 8-5, 8-5, 8-5, 9-4. Averaged 9-wins a year at BYU.

His Virginia tenure was below average compared to Virginia's historical winning pct.

Edit: Removed P5 reference
 
Last edited:
He never went 8-5 in the Mountain West. He went 6-6, 11-2, 11-2, 10-3, 11-2, and 7-6 in the MWC. Then he was 10-3, 8-5, 8-5, 8-5, 9-4 in P5. Averaged 9-wins a year at BYU.

His Virginia tenure was below average compared to Virginia's historical winning pct.

The back half of that catalogue at BYU isn't P5 bro, lol. They were an independent w/ an impressive MWC heavy slate like these:

Screen Shot 2022-11-21 at 2.01.18 PM.png
 
Good catch. I thought they went B12 but that's next year.

BYU would be middle of the pack in stadium capacity in the Big 10. They have way better facilities+resources than any other G5 team had during his tenure there. They were the OU/Texas of the MWC.
 
BYU would be middle of the pack in stadium capacity in the Big 10. They have way better facilities+resources than any other G5 team had during his tenure there. They were the OU/Texas of the MWC.
So how would you rank those guys by total resume?
 
Something like:

Doeren
Campbell/Klieman
Leipold/Mendenhall
I give more credit to lower level success when it's validated when a dude moves up. I probably like Campbell more than most people on here. I don't know where to rank Leipold b/c of small sample size, but think people around here underrate how impressive his work at KU was this year given what that job is.

1. Klieman
2. Doeren
3. Campbell
4. Leipold
5. Mendenhall
 
Back
Top