If he did its just further proof Kelly is a dipshit.Did he get a bigger bag of cash?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he did its just further proof Kelly is a dipshit.Did he get a bigger bag of cash?
Jimari Butler made a big mistake, IMO, transferring to LSU where he is 2nd string.
This is a guy that Rhule regularly praised for doing things the right way and also playing through pain. The coaches respected him and the fans liked him. He would be starting here. He would be the captain of the DL. Why leave that situation?
And I'm supposed to believe that LSU is paying him better money than what Nebraska was offering and they are paying him to be a back up???
Pittman out, this season has to be a record for coaches fired this early in.
The transfer portal has forced teams to have to make these moves early. Gotta have the new man in place to save your roster from having a mass exodus.Pittman out, this season has to be a record for coaches fired this early in.
Well he is a far better passer than Allar. Allar is super average passing the ball. Tyler Warren made him look decent last year, but that guy was a complete freak at the college levelI was watching the game last night and while Allar is slightly more mobile, it think Raiola is a legit better passer. Maybe it’s the homer in me, but I think he could be the most underrated QB in CFB
Are boy Lane Train havin fun on X as usual
![]()
yeah, winning with contempt for the opponent would be a nice change from losing with dignity.He's not the "Nebraska Way" but I'd take Joey Freshwater in a heartbeat.
![]()
Great GIF!!!
Why have teams been going for two when they are only going to be down by 7 if they kick the extra point? If you miss the conversion, then you will have to go for two if you score again regardless. I just don't understand why teams have been doing that. Just seems stupid and unnecessary.
AnAlYtIcS
You only have to get 1 two point conversion to tie or win in 2 tries vs. 1 to win or lose if you kick the first one.
Of course this operates under the shaky assumption that with 11 minutes to go in the game the other team is done scoring
Yeah I'd just like to see the actual data on how often sometimes these cockamamie schemes pay off because I think the support for it is mostly theoretical.
What I don't understand is that why go for it on the previous touchdown. If you miss, then you have to do it again. If you wait to go for two on the second touchdown, then that seems more favorable. Why possibly make yourself got for two twice rather than once.
It's really just about splitting the risk across 2 tries instead of 1.
Suppose you're a team that converts 60% of your 2 point conversion attempts.
If you go for for it when you score to go down 1, you have a 60% chance of winning (40% chance of failure)
If you go for it on 2 tries, there's an 84% probability of converting one or both (drops probability of failure to 16%)
Of course if you succeed on the first try (down 8) which has an equal probability of success as down 1, you get an even higher chance of going up because PATs are 99%+
At least that's what I think the rationale is
Yeah that's the logic but it's not a 50/50 gamble for every team even though it's a binary outcome.View attachment 59263
Increases your win % by ~12.5%
Arkansas coach? Talk about a program that has suffered more than us moving from one conference to another. SEC has been rough on them.