Welcome to The Platinum Board

We are a Nebraska Husker fan community. Please either login or register for an account

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Northwestern Game Week

His prediction sounds good, coming from a homer.

Ask the Expert: Northwestern writer gives takes, score prediction for Saturday​

Grant Hansen •about 10 hours
1697737363787.jpeg
Northwestern tight end Charlie Mangieri catches the winning touchdown in overtime against Minnesota at Ryan Field. (Credit: David Banks-USA TODAY Sports)

Nebraska welcomes the 3-3 Northwestern Wildcats to Lincoln on Saturday for its first game in the second half of the 2023 season.

This week, HuskerOnline sat down with Louie Vaccher of WildcatReport to breakdown Northwestern in the “Ask the Expert” column. He talks the Wildcats’ surprising .500 start, the health of quarterback Ben Bryant and interim head coach David Braun’s shot at the full-time job.

Here are Vaccher’s thoughts and score prediction for Saturday’s game.

1. What has surprised you the most about Northwestern’s season?​

I think just the fact that Northwestern is 3-3 at the halfway point of the season and still has a shot at becoming bowl eligible is the biggest surprise of all.

You have to remember where this program was in mid-July, when head coach Pat Fitzgerald was fired. It seemed like the sky was falling. There were questions about whether the Wildcats should just cancel the season, even though it was never really an option. And here we are, after six games, and the Wildcats already have three wins – two more than they had all of last season, and one short of the total from the last two seasons combined.

That says a lot about the people in the Northwestern locker room, especially interim head coach David Braun.

Northwestern’s administration’s handling of the hazing scandal that cost Fitzgerald his job and spawned a host of lawsuits was riddled with miscues, but they did pick the right guy to lead the program through this very difficult time.

2. Which unit has exceeded expectations and which needs to improve the most?​

I think the best and weakest units are on the offense.

This might be Northwestern’s best starting wide receiver group in more than a decade. Cam Johnson, a grad transfer from Vanderbilt and Arizona State, leads the team with 26 catches and is a strong, physical possession receiver. Bryce Kirtz has some speed and leads the Cats with 327 receiving yards and three touchdown catches. He turned in the best performance by a Northwestern receiver since 1980 when he put up 10 catches for 215 yards against Minnesota. Finally, there’s the burner, grad transfer AJ Henning from Michigan, who has the speed to blow the top off of a defense – something we don’t see very often in Evanston.

On the flip side, I think the offensive line has been the biggest disappointment thus far. They have allowed 22 sacks, the second-most in the Big Ten. Not all of them are solely their responsibility, but when Howard registers four sacks against you – their total through five previous games – there are some issues. On top of that, they haven’t been able to get much of a push up front in the running game – they rank last in the Big Ten in rushing – and allow 7.0 tackles for loss per game, which ranks 97th in the nation. More was expected from a unit that had quite a bit of starting experience returning.

3. Will Ben Bryant be good to go this week and what has he brought to the table compared to his predecessors?​

The status of Bryant is unknown, but I think it’s doubtful we see him on Saturday. Braun dropped a bomb on Monday at his press conference, saying he was “not sure exactly what [Bryant’s] status will be come game time. But he is progressing and we anticipate that will be something we continue to evaluate as the week goes along.”

That sounds ominous.

Bryant suffered what the program called an upper body injury against Penn State and missed the Wildcats’ last game against Howard, but we thought that was more precautionary than anything against an FCS opponent.

If Bryant can’t play, that really puts a dent in Northwestern’s chances of pulling off an upset. Nebraska has a strong run defense, and the Wildcats haven’t been able to run the ball very well for most of the season. I thought their best chance against Nebraska was to let Bryant throw it all over the yard to a very talented receiver corps. Bryant is by far Northwestern’s best and most efficient passer. Brendan Sullivan, who played against Howard in Bryant’s absence, is a dual-threat guy who looked indecisive throwing the ball.

I wonder if Ryan Hilinski, the man who led NU’s win over the Huskers last season, might get the start because he’s the best remaining thrower. Whoever starts, we’ll also likely seeJack Lausch take some snaps, too; he’s a wildcat quarterback they like to bring in as a change-of-pace.

4. What is the path to victory for Northwestern?​

As I explained above, I thought the passing game was Northwestern’s best hope offensively. That’s how they beat Minnesota; they trailed 31-10 in the fourth quarter and had no choice but to air it out, and Bryant was brilliant as the Cats scored 21 unanswered points to tie it, and then he threw a TD pass to win it in the first overtime. The biggest question against Nebraska was going to be whether the Wildcats could protect him. When you give him time, Bryant is a very accurate and capable quarterback. With Bryant out, I’m not sure Sullivan or Hilinski will be able to execute the same game plan.

Defensively, the strategy will be pretty straightforward: contain the run, keep Heinrich Haarberg in the pocket and make him beat you through the air. That’s easier said than done, of course, but Northwestern did a pretty good job against Penn State earlier this season.

Dual-threat QBs generally give NU fits, as Duke’s Riley Leonard did in Week 3, but if their ends can contain Haarberg and not let him get outside to extend plays, they may be able to keep the Wildcats in the game. But they’ll wear down unless the offense holds up their end of the bargain.

5. How would you evaluate David Brauns’ performance as interim head coach? Does he have a shot at the head job?​

I think Braun has exceeded just about everyone’s expectations so far. The players absolutely love him, and if you watch the Wildcats, you can see that they are playing hard every week.

Braun has been open, honest and straightforward with players, fans and the media. He seems to be a genuinely good guy and everyone seems to both like and respect him. He’s done a tremendous job holding this team together in the wake of the firing of a beloved head coach, and keeping this team focused week to week.

We’ll see how Braun closes out the season, but I think he has at least earned an interview at this point. There are questions about whether he’ll be able to recruit at a Big Ten level, and whether he’ll be able to lead the program through the upheaval coming.

Remember, whoever the new coach is will have to deal with the fallout of several lawsuits, replacing all or part of a coaching staff, rebuilding a roster that may lose a lot of transfers and reporting to an athletic director and school president who have also come under fire.

Oh, and, if the stadium plan goes forward as expected, the Wildcats will have to play without a true home field the next two years as Ryan Field is remodeled. That’s a challenging scenario for Nick Saban, let alone a coach as inexperienced as Braun.

6. How similar are the stakes for Nebraska and Northwestern entering this week’s game?​

I would imagine both teams view this game as a must-win if they want to make a bowl game this season.

Northwestern has three program goals each year: win the West division, win the Big Ten and win the bowl game. Technically, they are all still on the table (Remember, NU is 1-2 in the Big Ten and still controls its destiny if they win), but this season would be seen as a huge success if the Wildcats can just make a bowl game. It might earn Braun the full-time job, too, as well as potentially the Big Ten coach of the year award.

Northwestern needs three more wins to be bowl-eligible. Looking at the rest of the schedule, Nebraska, Purdoodoo and Illinois are probably their best chances to get wins. Their other games, against Maryland, Cockeye and Wisconsin, are definitely less likely. But in the wild, wild West, where no one can score, anything is possible, isn’t it?

7. What’s your final take and score prediction for Saturday’s game?​

If Bryant can’t play, I don’t think Northwestern will be able to get over the hump. I think the defense will allow them to hang around, but ultimately, if the offense can’t get a rhythm going and goes three-and-out too many times, the Wildcats will wear down and the Huskers will pull away.

That said, the one wild card here is turnovers. The Huskers are -7 on the year and rank 130th in the nation in turnover margin. If they give the ball away a few times, Northwestern could have a chance to steal one in Lincoln. And as Husker fans know, they’ve done it before.

Expert Score Prediction: Nebraska 23, Northwestern 13​

 


Poor sipple is gonna get canceled for taking the lords name in vain

OGC.39a79b289f6d02615e924f5802e0b17a
 
One thing I don't get is this narrative that playing WR early is hard.... Same has been pushing it and Rhule embraced it in the presser today. I have always thought WR is an easier spot to play early.

@slattimer what are your thoughts? Am I missing something? What makes our passing game so complicated that it makes it hard to play young guys?
Agreed and will be interested to see what @slattimer says. The only thing I could think of is that maybe our offense is much more complex than most when it comes to sight adjustments vs. the blitz and disguises in coverages post-snap that change routes
 
One thing I don't get is this narrative that playing WR early is hard.... Same has been pushing it and Rhule embraced it in the presser today. I have always thought WR is an easier spot to play early.

@slattimer what are your thoughts? Am I missing something? What makes our passing game so complicated that it makes it hard to play young guys?
If you're learning all 3 before you play, probably hard. Their formation variety seems pretty complex in who's on/off and compressing splits. But if you're learning one...not near as hard. I get it, it's good to know what everyone else is doing in the concept, but get dudes on the field.

I do think it's more of a pro-style passing system where they need to adjust their routes based on coverage...but I'm not positive of that.
 
I do think it's more of a pro-style passing system where they need to adjust their routes based on coverage...but I'm not positive of that.


I went back and listened to what he said. One of the reasons it is complex, he said, was that in practice the WRs are seeing mostly man and cover 2. He said most of our opponents are running quarters. As a result, our WRs are running completely different routes in games than in practice.

He said by this time next year it will all be second nature for the WRs.
 
One thing I don't get is this narrative that playing WR early is hard.... Same has been pushing it and Rhule embraced it in the presser today. I have always thought WR is an easier spot to play early.

@slattimer what are your thoughts? Am I missing something? What makes our passing game so complicated that it makes it hard to play young guys?
I think one of the bigger factors is that none of the HS WRs were here for spring. Like Rhule mentioned, most of the young guys that are making an impact were (aside from Van Poppel). Also, 2 of the 3 freshmen WRs are from Nebraska. The adjustment for them you would expect to be bigger than for say guys like Lenhardt (IMG), Umanmielen & Van Poppel (TX).
 
Our sad sack media is lucky Rhule is a patient man, I could only imagine Fat Sam asking Bo, or even Frost, if he was going to hit up the volleyball game after the football game and the lady at the end asking if it was important for the football team to still be supportive of the volleyball team in season, at the football presser with a game in 2 days 🤣.

We really need to keep winning games and make it to a bowl this year bad ☠️.
 
I went back and listened to what he said. One of the reasons it is complex, he said, was that in practice the WRs are seeing mostly man and cover 2. He said most of our opponents are running quarters. As a result, our WRs are running completely different routes in games than in practice.

He said by this time next year it will all be second nature for the WRs.
maybe I'm an idiot, but I thought that was what the scout team was for?
 
@Zack Carpenter kindly transcribed Rhule's comments in his coverage

Rhule spoke to how hard it is for a true freshman receiver to get on the field in their first year in the face of many peoples' opinions that it's one of the positions where it's easier to play early in college – especially when they don't enroll early, as all six of the Huskers' 2023 receiver signees didn't get to campus until the summer.

“Significantly harder (than people think)," Rhule said. "I mean, it depends on where you go. If you’re in a spread offense that has four or five concepts, then maybe (the transition is easier). Our receivers didn’t come in mid-year, either. Nowadays, there are some schools – like I was talking to the guys at Clemson, I think their whole class, or pretty close to it, came in mid-year. Nowadays, with the pressure to win right away, you’re bringing everyone in mid-year. Jaylen, Jaidyn and Malachi all showed up in the summer. So that’s difficult. But I just think it’s the volume of offense and the volume of the things you have to do. And we go against our (defense) every week, and they’re a man-free team, play some Cover 2, and you run some certain routes against that or you have some certain reads. Now, all of a sudden you get into the Big Ten, which is predominantly a quarters (defense) conference, and now you’re running some different routes and some different adjustments.

"For the quarterbacks and those guys, it’s a little bit of a challenge. (It’s easier) when you have a little bit of time under your belt, so this time next year this will be a breeze for these guys. But there’s a lot of different things you have to do at receiver. You also have to learn how to really take care of your body because you’re running all the time. It’s way easier to come in and rush the passer, you can just situationally go out there. People will say to me, like our defensive coaches will say Well just put in so-and-so? Why don’t you just run this play with them?’ Well, yeah, OK you can do that a couple times a game, but it’s pretty hard as a coordinator to just go ‘OK, give me this guy for this play, give me this guy for that play.’ Really, at the end of the day, we need receivers to go win on third down, and that’s a multitude of things we have to do (teach them). But these guys are at that point, though, where they can play and they’re ready to play.”
 

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Wide/Narrow view

    You can control a structure that you can use to use your theme wide or narrow.

    Grid view forum list

    You can control the layout of the forum list in a grid or ordinary listing style structure.

    Close sidebar

    You can get rid of the crowded view in the forum by closing the sidebar.

    Fixed sidebar

    You can make it more useful and easier to access by pinning the sidebar.

  • Color combinations cannot be used

    Color combinations are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.

    Color gradient backgrounds
Back