Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m not OP - but it was. No soup nazi or man hands back in those daysDid OP call Seinfeld season 3 mediocre?
Appreciate your resume. I think an offensive identity begins with how you want to block the run. Are you going to run power, are you going to run zone, how do you use TEs. It starts there and once you know that your offense compliments those schematic desires.LOL yes. 28 years of coordinating a defense. 32 years of coaching football. 10 semifinals, 3 state championships. 1 runner up. 4 state championship games in which we gave up a total of 26 pts. (0, 12, 7, 7).
I would say I have some perspective.
Nebraska's offensive identity can be summed up in one word. Ambiguous! Spread, Air raid, Pro, Wing, Tempo, etc... .
Right now its a hodge podge of stuff. This can be great if you have the dudes to do it. Keeps a defense off balance, attacks weaknesses using a variety of formations, shifts, RPO...etc. I think at a place like Nebraska its hard to recruit to that. I would love for us to get back to a power/pro style offense. One that can utilize the spread as needed but is rooted in a basic principled system. Run first. I don't care if it gap or zone scheme or a combo of both, but establish a run game identity and build from there.
Right now our offense and to an extent our defense look like Fred's first few years. Just trying to find something that works and works fast. Problem is it never works long.
Im all for a big step back in year 4 and even 5 to establish identities on both sides of the ball with the hopes of a giant leap forward in year 6. What's another couple of years after 18 years of mediocrity?
When I think offensive identity I think Tom Osborne. I personally believe that Nebraska needs something unique to compete at the very top. Im not saying we need to run the option but i don't believe, and history seems to be proving me right, that we can recruit to the spread, or run-n-gun, or air attack as well as others can. We can get a component here or there but seemingly not all at the same time.Appreciate your resume. I think an offensive identity begins with how you want to block the run. Are you going to run power, are you going to run zone, how do you use TEs. It starts there and once you know that your offense compliments those schematic desires.
Yep. The next year or two will tell the story. I actually like what Rhule has done portal wise on offense so far. I’m not sure about the defense.Agreed. Losing Dylan hurt more than most believed it would...Me included. Minny is just a head scratch to me. Cockeye.... By the time we got to that game we were a defeated program.
Rhule has a lot to prove. I'm not arguing that. As a coach, I do a lot of head scratching while watching games. But my take is we need to see this thing finished out over at least a 5 year run. Then we move from there. Where???? I have no idea.
I think he's banking on a new DC and new energy to buy us some quality defensive time. We are not in a good place on the DL or LB. Hoping we can finish strong in the portal and then make huge gains in the off season in those two position groups.Yep. The next year or two will tell the story. I actually like what Rhule has done portal wise on offense so far. I’m not sure about the defense.
I feel better about LB, would feel even better if we had a decent LB corch. Chambliss will be good, Shavers isn't bad, Merritt has tons of potential. Also added some good young depth pieces thru the portal (Hawthorne and the beaver guy)I think he's banking on a new DC and new energy to buy us some quality defensive time. We are not in a good place on the DL or LB. Hoping we can finish strong in the portal and then make huge gains in the off season in those two position groups.
I feel like Rhule's first two years, we were impressed by the linebackers. I could be misremembering.I feel better about LB, would feel even better if we had a decent LB corch. Chambliss will be good, Shavers isn't bad, Merritt has tons of potential. Also added some good young depth pieces thru the portal (Hawthorne and the beaver guy)
Because Tony White brought in some guys to assist with the LBs. No coincidence that when he bounced, our LBs turned to shitI feel like Rhule's first two years, we were impressed by the linebackers. I could be misremembering.
Ty, Nash, and Jimari also bounced and then Jeudy lived in their laps all season, so idk that it's all FonyBecause Tony White brought in some guys to assist with the LBs. No coincidence that when he bounced, our LBs turned to shit
Out of curiosity I looked at Nebraska and FSU defensive stats and they're remarkably similar in how terrible they were, despite both being "top-30 defenses" (Neb 30th, FSU 28th)Because Tony White brought in some guys to assist with the LBs. No coincidence that when he bounced, our LBs turned to shit
All Tony iwbhwo hth gbrTy, Nash, and Jimari also bounced and then Jeudy lived in their laps all season, so idk that it's all Fony
That’s why I think Butler was a little bit of a scapegoat. If he had Nash and Ty last year his defense would have been pretty good plus it seemed like Rhule put more of an emphasis on the offense portal wise coming into this past season.Ty, Nash, and Jimari also bounced and then Jeudy lived in their laps all season, so idk that it's all Fony
I think he was definitely a scapegoat. But I also think he might not have been a good culture fit (which is also on Rhule).That’s why I think Butler was a little bit of a scapegoat. If he had Nash and Ty last year his defense would have been pretty good plus it seemed like Rhule put more of an emphasis on the offense portal wise coming into this past season.
What is a good culture fit with Rhule by now? I really don’t know what he wants to do?I think he was definitely a scapegoat. But I also think he might not have been a good culture fit (which is also on Rhule).
I'm just assuming that's the case. I don't know what his culture is either.What is a good culture fit with Rhule by now? I really don’t know what he wants to do?
I think it’s one of those over used words. It does look like Rhule’s offense might have an identity on offense with what he has added in the portal though. I haven’t really seen much of an identity up to this point.I'm just assuming that's the case. I don't know what his culture is either.
I think it’s possible he was a bit of a scapegoat but also that, nevertheless, Rhule could see he picked the wrong horse.That’s why I think Butler was a little bit of a scapegoat. If he had Nash and Ty last year his defense would have been pretty good plus it seemed like Rhule put more of an emphasis on the offense portal wise coming into this past season.
I think identity is also one of those over used words.I think it’s one of those over used words. I does look like Rhule’s offense might have an identity on offense with what he has added in the portal though. I haven’t really seen much of an identity up to this point.