Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!C'mon DJ...set down that heavy backpack of despair and hurt you are carrying around. It's gonna be ok brother, I'm here for you man. Let's do it together...you can do this...just 2 or 3 simple things that make us better and get us to a bowl game.
Let's get through that and then we can talk about you making out with your cousins. One step at a time brother. 😉
It's as plausible as clapping fucking up the snap, so I think you're rightI really feel like everyone is missing out on the positive effect of having the cheerleaders back on the sidelines! Boyz will play better with more testosterone pumping. Just my opinion 🤷
I hung up the old troll shoes but am happy to consult if desired. Happy trolling!
You're supposed to pass after two puffs, man!We play all 2.5 seasons again with the same guys I think we'd make a bowl each season.
martinez ripped his sleeves off and turned into justin fields
Special teams and defense imo. I've lost all faith in this offense producing at this point - I think if we want to make a bowl we need to follow the path of the 2009 team.
2-1 non con is a must. Beating beefy bort bielema probably is tooBeat Buffalo. I'm 90% serious. If we lose to Buffalo, not a chance in hell. Even if we lose to Illinois (fucking hell at having to type that), if we come back and beat Buffalo, getting to six wins is still possible. I just don't see getting the six without one of those being Buffalo.
We should most definitely beat Buffalo with who they lost, but Leipold will undoubtedly coach circles around Scott.
Curious as to why you believe this to be a givenLeipold will undoubtedly coach circles around Scott.
Because apparently, I have a better grasp of Scott's coaching prowess than you. I'm also much less connected, which likely contributes to this. We all have our biases.Curious as to why you believe this to be a given
Because apparently, I have a better grasp of Scott's coaching prowess than you. I'm also much less connected, which likely contributes to this. We all have our biases.
Leipold's record speaks for itself. Scott's does as well. One has succeeded at both of his stops and built each program in a successful way. One has succeeded at one (without truly building the program, but obviously deserves credit for the incredibly quick turnaround and undefeated season) and driven the other further into the ditch. I hope like hell to be proven wrong in the long run, but I can only go off the present.
Edit: the other thing that makes me think this is a given is because there is little to no evidence that Scott is willing to learn from his mistakes. If anything, he's shown a propensity to double-down on the aspects of the program that have held us back for so long. Given the relative talent and outcomes to this point, a purely statistical analysis suggests Scott is likely to be out coached by the guy on the other sideline. Leipold isn't just a run-of-the-mill guy on the other sideline.
I apologize for that. I just think your rosy view of the staff is based more on having connections to it than actual outcomes and the current situation of the program. Seen it once, seen it a thousand times. We defend our friends and hope for the best for them. You're right though, I didn't need to be a dick about it, and I do sincerely apologize for that.Is there a reason you started this post off like a dickhead?