Breaking By Popular Demand…

[Cavalot]

I have no idea. It’s a joke from my end

 

[TampaBaySkers]

So wait....This isn't a joke? Kong is a chick?

I nominate @Cavalot for actually believing Kong is a woman and for posting during school hours. Get back to work!

 

[Cavalot]

I nominate @Cavalot for actually believing Kong is a woman and for posting during school hours. Get back to work!

 

[NCsker]

If my posts use AI at times, it’s because I’m trying to bring organized, accurate information into the discussion — not chaos. When I post without it, you said yourself the takes are good, so clearly the problem isn’t the content.


If the standard is ‘good information,’ I’m meeting it either way. If the standard is something else, then just say that. But dismissing a nomination because I bring research or structure to conversations doesn’t make much sense.”**

or

Apparently I’m only dangerous when I have a robot sidekick.
Wild that my AI-powered posts are a problem, but my human-powered ones are ‘fairly good.’


Look, if the biggest controversy here is that I sometimes bring too much information, then I must be doing alright.


I promise the AI isn’t running for nomination — just me.”**

or

Honestly, if my AI posts are the worst thing about me, that’s a win — I’ve definitely had worse moments powered entirely by my own brain.


If using AI makes me sound smarter than I actually am, blame the robot, not the nomination. When I go solo, you said my takes are ‘fairly good,’ which is probably the nicest thing anyone’s said about me on here in months.


Either way, I promise I’m just trying to contribute — occasionally with help, occasionally with whatever is rattling around in my head.”**

I’ll give you credit, you’re owning it at least. I’m 99% sure that even this post was AI generated, if not at least enhanced. NO ONE uses em dashes.

 

[Cavalot]

I’ll give you credit, you’re owning it at least. I’m 99% sure that even this post was AI generated, if not at least enhanced. NO ONE uses em dashes.

Give yourself a...

 

[HuskerHusaria]

So wait....This isn't a joke? Kong is a chick?

 

[NCsker]

Of the three, he’s not the worst. Posted the AI stuff but was trying to bring discussion to the board. But the quoting Dittman and subsequent name calling did him no favors. In his defense, since then has brought some good points to board.

Agreed. He is to Kong what Jalen Hurts was to Joe Burrow when Joe won the Heisman. Everyone knows he’s not gonna win but someone else needs to be there to fist bump the champion when they go up to accept the award.

 

[TampaBaySkers]

Agreed. He is to Kong what Jalen Hurts was to Joe Burrow when Joe won the Heisman. Everyone knows he’s not gonna win but someone else needs to be there to fist bump the champion when they go up to accept the award.

I disagree . I think Cav is the Nick Foles of this competition. A guy you’re rooting for to knock off Tom Brady, but surely he can’t - can he?

 

[Cavalot]

I disagree . I think Cav is the Nick Foles of this competition. A guy you’re rooting for to knock off Tom Brady, but surely he can’t - can he?

And I think you're the Nick Fuentes of this conversation. Just when you think the comments can't get any more malignant. You find a way to double down on them.

 

[Red Dog]

@Cavalot is a high level troll and I commend him for it

 

[TampaBaySkers]

@Cavalot is a high level troll and I commend him for it

I understand your confusion as surely no one can be retarded as Cav… but he’s not trolling. He is this retarded