Bud Elliot hates Nebraska..

[Bootleg11]

Bud also went on numerous rants in the offseason saying Dylan Raiola is not a good college QB.

I listen to just about every cover 3 podcast. Never heard him say that about Raiola.

Bud Elliott looks strictly at recruiting rankings and Bill Connelly’s power rankings. Not enough actual game film unless it’s in the south.

That being said. He was the very first guy to sound the alarm on Marcus Satterfield at OC and unfortunately he may end up being right about the DL.

But he doesn’t like Nebraska and that’s been obvious for a while.

The constant dick sucking of Lagway when he hasn’t played nearly as well as Raiola is annoying.

 

[V-Doub]

Back in the day, I believe Bud used to be the Dean C. of FSU but has since parlayed that into being a fringe national talent. Imagine Dean’s unbridled greed/ambition with an ounce more talent and spell checking ability.

So… he’s a fat closet homo?

 

[Dawgsauce]

I don't quite understand why Elliot hates Nebraska. I'm not sure if its something to do with his predictions of Raiola, Husker fans hating on him in social media or what. But this is insane:

He's a true anti-CornDawg, because he hates Georgia too. If Nebraska becomes a top 10 program hate will increase. You know who he loves? FSU. Dude is coocoo for FSU puffs.

 

[Zack Carpenter]

I don't quite understand why Elliot hates Nebraska. I'm not sure if its something to do with his predictions of Raiola, Husker fans hating on him in social media or what. But this is insane:

Gonna use this as my personal venting session right quick because it's been on my mind...

@Bootleg11 is right. Bud Elliott was front and center criticizing the Satt hire at OC (strongly, repeatedly and pretty much the minute the hire happened), and I've always given him credit for that because he deserves it. Overall, I think he's really good at what he does.

But the issue I have with Bud Elliott right now is:

– He picked Cincinnati to beat Nebraska, straight up.
– He said Nebraska's defense might be "bad, bad" (or maybe the actual quote was "really bad" ... either way)
– Nebraska beats Cincinnati.
– Nebraska holds Cincinnati to 17 points.
– In his analysis of Nebraska beating the team he picked it to lose against: "Nebraska looked a lot worse than I thought it would."
– The literal very next week, he picks Cincinnati to win + cover against Bowling Green because he believes "Cincinnati's defense might be really good."

Line all of those facts up and ... none of it lines up. Makes no sense. And the lack of accountability is aggravating as fuck.

 

[Dawgsauce]

Is this just some random tard or someone who may know what they are talking about and are credentialed?

He's actually pretty good, but also lets bias in and it is obvious at times. I listen to the pod despite Danny being on there.

 

[herbsinator]

Gonna use this as my personal venting session right quick because it's been on my mind...

@Bootleg11 is right. Bud Elliott was front and center criticizing the Satt hire at OC (strongly, repeatedly and pretty much the minute the hire happened), and I've always given him credit for that because he deserves it. Overall, I think he's really good at what he does.

But the issue I have with Bud Elliott right now is:

– He picked Cincinnati to beat Nebraska, straight up.
– He said Nebraska's defense might be "bad, bad" (or maybe the actual quote was "really bad" ... either way)
– Nebraska beats Cincinnati.
– Nebraska holds Cincinnati to 17 points.
– In his analysis of Nebraska beating the team he picked it to lose against: "Nebraska looked a lot worse than I thought it would."
– The literal very next week, he picks Cincinnati to win + cover against Bowling Green because he believes "Cincinnati's defense might be really good."

Line all of those facts up and ... none of it lines up. Makes no sense. And the lack of accountability is aggravating as fuck.

Zack C. coming with the dick heat!

 

[iruletheskool]

Weren't we 3-0 last year? Tia

 

[JankTheTank]

Gonna use this as my personal venting session right quick because it's been on my mind...

@Bootleg11 is right. Bud Elliott was front and center criticizing the Satt hire at OC (strongly, repeatedly and pretty much the minute the hire happened), and I've always given him credit for that because he deserves it. Overall, I think he's really good at what he does.

But the issue I have with Bud Elliott right now is:

– He picked Cincinnati to beat Nebraska, straight up.
– He said Nebraska's defense might be "bad, bad" (or maybe the actual quote was "really bad" ... either way)
– Nebraska beats Cincinnati.
– Nebraska holds Cincinnati to 17 points.
– In his analysis of Nebraska beating the team he picked it to lose against: "Nebraska looked a lot worse than I thought it would."
– The literal very next week, he picks Cincinnati to win + cover against Bowling Green because he believes "Cincinnati's defense might be really good."

Line all of those facts up and ... none of it lines up. Makes no sense. And the lack of accountability is aggravating as fuck.

Back in 2008, some Nebraska fans on the boards noted how LSU's defense regressed and took pride in that. We snagged Bo from them, and the regression of their defense was validation that we acquired a great commodity. Florida St now has Tony White. It's not hard to see the motives on why a sports writer with an FSU affiliation would spin a yarn focused on Nebraska's regression now that our prior defensive wunderkind holds residence in Tallahassee.