We're not doing the single digit uniform thing again are we? | The Platinum Board

We're not doing the single digit uniform thing again are we?

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

We're not doing the single digit uniform thing again are we?

huskerj12

Wide Receiver
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
2,411
Likes
11,905
Anybody know? I haven't heard about it but I also haven't been paying close attention yet.
 
I hope not. I've thought it was stupid since the moment Rhule said he does this.
Yeah same. I am a big Rhule fan but the single digit thing is a swing and a miss for me. It just creates awkwardness. Player numbers are supposed to be "permanent," at the very least throughout a season, but also usually throughout a career. Imagine Ahman Green being #30 in 1995 and 1996 and then suddenly he's #2 in 1997? Suh being #93 and then oh, now he's #6?

It just rubs me the wrong way from a macro view like that, but then also there are situations like last year when Jimari Butler was #1 and then suddenly he didn't want to be anymore and went back to #10, and Vincent Shavers was #1... ? Did that mean Shavers took over the spot as one of the Tough Guys and Butler was demoted? Shavers may well have deserved it, but using uniform numbers for this type of "honor" just doesn't work for me. It's even more awkward than giving and taking away Blackshirts in the Bo years.

My suggestion which obviously carries zero weight, would be to use the early Frost thing of putting guys' area codes on their helmet, except it's just for the 10 toughest guys or whatever. Less distracting, less awkward, still a way to honor those guys by letting some of their individuality and hometown pride shine through.

Nebraska-helmet.jpg


I also just don't agree with the premise that single digit numbers are inherently cooler or "tougher" than double digits. haha
 
We are. Rhule mentioned it during one of his pressers recently. Talked about how the players vote for the single digits is completely up to the players.

I agree with those saying this isn't my favorite tradition. I mainly say that because I had a number I wore since junior high football. If I was told I would be "honored" by ditching that number for some single digit number, my instinct would be to say no thanks, I'm sticking with my number. I don't see single digit numbers as inherently cooler or more desirebale than double digits.

Now, maybe if I didn't get my old JH/HS number and was stuck wtih some random number, maybe switching to a single digit wouldn't be a big deal for me. But if I was in my third or fourth year of college, I would have probably become attached to whatever number I had been wearing.
 
I don't get upset about it and it's not something I think about regularly. But I do think it's stupid.
Yeah I'm not upset or bitching really, I just think it's kind of a dud. Especially when:

A) O-linemen aren't even eligible to wear the numbers
B) Players apparently can/do turn it down
C) One player already changed back to his original double-digit number midseason in the second year of doing it

Again, I'm all for motivational tactics and players giving props to each other, using jersey numbers specifically just has an awkwardness to it.
 
Back
Top