Who is likely to be a Designated Student-Athlete (Grandfathered)? | The Platinum Board

Who is likely to be a Designated Student-Athlete (Grandfathered)?

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Who is likely to be a Designated Student-Athlete (Grandfathered)?

Carm

Offensive Coordinator
Recruiting Analyst
Insider
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
8,368
Likes
37,153
Nebraska has to be at 105 plus designated student-athletes (grandfathered players) by EOD 8/27/25.

A designated student-athlete is "an individual who a member institution attests was or would have been removed from the institution’s 2025-26 roster due to the implementation of roster limits and was either: 1. Certified as eligible for practice or competition or otherwise placed on the institution’s squad list form for the 2024-25 academic year, prior to April 7, 2025, or 2. Recruited prior to April 7, 2025, to be, or was assured by an institutional staff member the individual would be, on the institution’s roster for the 2025-26 academic year. "

If a DSA gets aid or revenue sharing, it counts toward the pool cap even though they are not on the roster. They can, of course, play; they are on the roster. The roster exemption belongs to the player - for example, it transfers or departs with him. It may make players more desirable as other teams can transfer them in without using a roster spot. The July 6 designation is a one-time only event.

The DSAs must be designated by July 6th (30 days after the settlement was announced).

Nebraska, with 126 current roster spots, needs to designate 21 SAs. The pool of people we could designate, as it should be possible to attest that more than 21 athletes on this roster who have been cut.

Questions: would you simply go through the exerciser of deciding which 21 would be cut and turn in those names or would you employ a strategy more designed to maximize r

I'll start it off. I think I would designate 21 by using mostly guys destined for little PT put also putting in people who have been injured a lot (on the basis that with only 105 slots I couldn't afford to keep some of those guys on the roster - they might get injured again). I'd be afraid of putting too many guys in need of further development on the risk as it would simply make them more attractive to other teams. I would avoid putting guys with 4 years of eligibility on the list.

QB
1. Gramstad
2. Longval
3. Soukup
RB
4. Genatone
5. Dickey
WR
6. Bell
7. Miller
8. Mangini
9. Singleton
OL
10. Prochazka
11. Brandl
DL
12. George
13. Conneally
LB
14. Wacker
15. Uhlir
16. Gradney
DB
17. Conn
18 Branch
19. Stewart
ST
20. Flege
21. Koch
 
Back
Top