Welcome to The Platinum Board

We are a Nebraska Husker fan community. Please either login or register for an account

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Breaking USC & UCLAbia Joining BIG 10

There is no chance that guy actually had a source and was in the know.
I'm sad to say I'm someone that watched several of his streams out of his dad's pickup and even downloaded one of his songs. With that said he was very open about being a total nobody who just happened to have a source this one time. Sometimes random people have good sources.
 
ESPN is trying to void their own deal?
The only way I could make sense of that is if ESPN has determined the GOR is vulnerable (or too expensive to defend with multiple programs challenging it), then maybe they would want to make a deal that allows them to hold on to the programs they want without them just going to free agency and maybe the B1G.
 
The only way I could make sense of that is if ESPN has determined the GOR is vulnerable (or too expensive to defend with multiple programs challenging it), then maybe they would want to make a deal that allows them to hold on to the programs they want without them just going to free agency and maybe the B1G.
Wouldn't that open up ESPN to litigation from all the remaining schools that didn't get poached? That would basically be them saying we are taking these schools from you to add to the SEC to make the SEC worth more, and all the rest of you basically get nothing (or a much more reduced amount) because the conference would no longer be as valuable without those 4 mentioned programs.

*Edit - Because ESPN basically owns both the SEC and ACC, and they would be essentially stealing from the ACC to make the SEC better.
 
Wouldn't that open up ESPN to litigation from all the remaining schools that didn't get poached? That would basically be them saying we are taking these schools from you to add to the SEC to make the SEC worth more, and all the rest of you basically get nothing (or a much more reduced amount) because the conference would no longer be as valuable without those 4 mentioned programs.

*Edit - Because ESPN basically owns both the SEC and ACC, and they would be essentially stealing from the ACC to make the SEC better.
I'm just trying to make a guess to see if there is any way to make this make sense, but to play this out, maybe since the contract is such shit, ESPN just guarantees those schools the same payout for the remainder of the original contract term so they have no monetary damages.
 
I'm just trying to make a guess to see if there is any way to make this make sense, but to play this out, maybe since the contract is such shit, ESPN just guarantees those schools the same payout for the remainder of the original contract term so they have no monetary damages.
I suppose that would make sense, seems like a bad deal from ESPN, but if they moved those other schools to the SEC (and since the ACC deal was so terrible for the ACC), maybe they see it as a net positive.

My only question with that would it seem like almost tampering or something. Not sure if that is plausible in this scenario since ESPN has the deal with both conferences, but if this was actually true, it seems like those same schools should be allowed to shop other conferences as well without any penalty. Doesn't seem right (but I am admittedly not knowledgeable in contracts) that only ESPN/SEC would be allowed to make a run at those particular schools in order to boast another league they basically own. I say that believing that the Big Ten would like to have Virginia and North Carolina and would be interested in at least talking with them, but currently they aren't able to (realistically) because of the GOR the ACC gave to ESPN.
 
ESPN is trying to void their own deal?
they also have a bigger partnership with the SEC starting this season. ESPN has been struggling financially for a few years now so it wouldn't be all that crazy for them to try to expand their prime CFB property (the SEC) and get rid of some of the rest. outside a handful of schools, I don't think they give a shit about broadcasting many ACC games
 
ESPN would be in dildo pic levels of litigation if they even tried to void that deal unsuccessfully. But I guess if you can't trust swimswamnews and sir yacht, you can't trust anyone
 
Last edited:
ESPN would be in dildo pic levels of litigation if they even tried to void that deal unsuccessfully. But I guess if you can't trust swimswamnews and sir yacht, you can't trust anyone
What do you mean when you say dildo pic levels of litigation
 
This is interesting. This is the first real media guy I've seen make an allusion to ESPN dealing with top ACC brands.

 
This is interesting. This is the first real media guy I've seen make an allusion to ESPN dealing with top ACC brands.


I think the grant of rights is with the conference so even if ESPN could tear up the deal to allow Clemson to go to the SEC, which they probably can't, Clemson still has to get out of giving up the next 14 years of their media rights
 

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Wide/Narrow view

    You can control a structure that you can use to use your theme wide or narrow.

    Grid view forum list

    You can control the layout of the forum list in a grid or ordinary listing style structure.

    Close sidebar

    You can get rid of the crowded view in the forum by closing the sidebar.

    Fixed sidebar

    You can make it more useful and easier to access by pinning the sidebar.

  • Color combinations cannot be used

    Color combinations are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.

    Color gradient backgrounds
Back