Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!Big Ten needs to get to work on Notre Dame, Georgia Tech, Virginia
Big Ten needs to get to work on Notre Dame, Georgia Tech, Virginia
As would the B10. They are where they need to be as a cultural fit and traditional rivalries.That would be a horrible fit for UNC.
Big Ten needs to get to work on Notre Dame, Georgia Tech, Virginia
As would the B10. They are where they need to be as a cultural fit and traditional rivalries.
UNC is probably in a better financial position than most non-P2 schools, but they see the writing on the wall. If they don't find a way to substantially increase revenue they will be left behindYou’re not wrong. I said the same thing about our leaving the Big 12 (other than hating Texas)
UNC’s problem (and really any attractive program in the ACC) is the conference is in decline from a financial standpoint and what was already a largely second tier football conference will potentially slip even further down the ladder. The SEC and B1G both offer the financial security no other conferences offer. I (and apparently UNC’s higher ups) think that gap widens in the coming decade.
UNC isn’t an SEC school or fan base at all. Many of their fans are snotty and don’t fit. Their basketball programs carries weight and will compete well in the SEC, but that’s about it.
The GOAT@SirYacht reporting this?
As would the B10. They are where they need to be as a cultural fit and traditional rivalries.
That would be a horrible fit for UNC.
I agree with this in the traditional sense, but the other conferences are going away, and we're going to be left with 2 leagues that aren't really going to be conferences in the way we used to think about conferences, but mini-NCAAs. If you want to play big boy sports at the college level, you pick one of the 2 to align yourself with, based on which one you think will make the most money for your school, and you probably want to hop on board sooner rather than later to get yourself the best deal.As would the B10. They are where they need to be as a cultural fit and traditional rivalries.
I'd like to play a lot of teams rather than our B10 conference members but that does not mean it's also best in the long run for those teams or the sport in general.ucla played in piscataway last year
I would rather have UNC than either of those teams
This is what people dont get about expansion. If the SEC and Big Ten go MEGA conference size to 24 or 28, it will paradoxically become more regional. The SEC and BIG will just be like the AFC and the NFC. They are just trimming the fat a little bit and moving from about 65 P5 schools to about 48-56 P2 schools.I agree with this in the traditional sense, but the other conferences are going away, and we're going to be left with 2 leagues that aren't really going to be conferences in the way we used to think about conferences, but mini-NCAAs. If you want to play big boy sports at the college level, you pick one of the 2 to align yourself with, based on which one you think will make the most money for your school, and you probably want to hop on board sooner rather than later to get yourself the best deal.
Then in a few years, once basically everyone has sorted, the conference that did the best at acquiring influential schools will have the upper hand in negotiations about how the 2 organizations come up with the rules & oversight framework that replaces/overhauls the NCAA.
At that point, with 2 25-30 team "conference" things can split back into some type of regional pods that are kinda sorta like the old smaller conferences of a few years ago.