- Messages
- 13,973
- Likes
- 47,471
Laffer curve... It is one of the reasons why Reagan and Trump tax cuts raised tax revenueWhat's the specific rationale for that claim?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!Laffer curve... It is one of the reasons why Reagan and Trump tax cuts raised tax revenueWhat's the specific rationale for that claim?
I'd you're going to do something different I'd prefer they structured the taxes that way personally. As an example I actually like Germany's method of dealing with Healthcare and the tax structure they use to pay for it.The elephant in the room is that democrats want to promise European social democracy style welfare states and want taxes to be structured totally different than how they're (mostly) structured to finance them in those places
Here is an article saying Elon might not pay any of the $11 billion by using Multinational Structuring? Thoughts on that if you have some time.It's the popular outlook when the stock market is having good years. Even if it isn't you'll still have success stories during those years you could point to. You don't pay tax on unrealized gains just like you don't deduct unrealized losses.
It's mostly timing in the end. Bezos and Musk weren't making money in 2018 and 2019 if you look at their income statement but you knew both of them were going to blow up well before they did.
The rich have advantages yes. They can absorb cash losses that are reducing taxable income while their net worth is increasing.
You want to tax unrealized gains that would be a fantastic way to completely destroy the economy quickly imo. At the very least destroy small business owners which in the long run would destroy the economy. Take those taxes and redistribute to the bottom half if you want to see some real inflation.
I'm good with the top 1% having years where they don't pay any taxes. In the long run they still pay the lions share. Everybody in the bottom 50% that don't pay dick ever and more than likely have a negative tax rate can lick my taint.
ThanksLaffer curve... It is one of the reasons why Reagan and Trump tax cuts raised tax revenue
Generally, people like taxes (more) when it's clear what they actually pay for.I'd you're going to do something different I'd prefer they structured the taxes that way personally. As an example I actually like Germany's method of dealing with Healthcare and the tax structure they use to pay for it.
Democrats want to move to gov't ran Healthcare and get the revenue for it from income tax.
Which is why I am a fan of the federal taxes coming down and shifting more of the responsibility toward states.Generally, people like taxes (more) when it's clear what they actually pay for.
Federalism can be a pain thoughWhich is why I am a fan of the federal taxes coming down and shifting more of the responsibility toward states.
The Tesla piece has nothing to do with Musk personally paying 11 billion. He already paid it when he exercised his stock options and nothing is reducing his personal income to get that back.Here is an article saying Elon might not pay any of the 11 billion by using Multinational Structuring? Thoughts on that if you have some time.
Elon Musk Has An $11 Billion Tax Bill, But Tesla Will Pay Exactly $0 In Federal Taxes Despite Record Profits | Carscoops
Elon Musk himself may not have to pay another federal tax bill until 2028www.carscoops.com
I assume super rich people pay taxes in ways that are pretty much incomprehensible to almost every personThe Tesla piece has nothing to do with Musk personally paying 11 billion. He already paid it when he exercised his stock options and nothing is reducing his personal income to get that back.
Tesla very well could have NOL carryovers. You don't get tax from the federal govt with a loss. The loss is carried over until there is income to offset it. It's really a stupid point that gets brought up too often. Again it's timing. If I lose 100k/year for 5 years and then make 500k year 6 how much tax should I pay?
As far as the multination/structuring goes there are several ways to shift income into a more favorable tax situation. One of the common ways auto manufacturers/dealers shift income overseas is through the warranty side but there are all lines of production that can take pieces of it. I'm not an international tax guy so I only have a basic understanding of it.
Thanks, appreciate your time.The Tesla piece has nothing to do with Musk personally paying 11 billion. He already paid it when he exercised his stock options and nothing is reducing his personal income to get that back.
Tesla very well could have NOL carryovers. You don't get tax from the federal govt with a loss. The loss is carried over until there is income to offset it. It's really a stupid point that gets brought up too often. Again it's timing. If I lose 100k/year for 5 years and then make 500k year 6 how much tax should I pay?
As far as the multination/structuring goes there are several ways to shift income into a more favorable tax situation. One of the common ways auto manufacturers/dealers shift income overseas is through the warranty side but there are all lines of production that can take pieces of it. I'm not an international tax guy so I only have a basic understanding of it.
Caitlyn Jenner doeOf course the election fraud, anti vax, Trump is the greatest ever posts are plenty. I did find this one funny.
View attachment 7616
Didn't he cut his off?Caitlyn Jenner doe
Only one way to find out ...Didn't he cut his off?
@kenyanfeline water boys services are neededOnly one way to find out ...
No I think it just got turned inside out and tucked in or somethingDidn't he cut his off?