- Messages
- 7,159
- Likes
- 23,626
I was wondering too. Are they changing to Whipple offense and terminology?
Whipple likes to chuck it around the yard. It’ll be fun to see what they do. Run the ball guy didn’t have a chance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!I was wondering too. Are they changing to Whipple offense and terminology?
Yeah gotta be hard to have a 1 year test to keep a job and switch the entire offense's terminology.we are running scott’s offense for the most part was my understanding. i could be off base with that
its about gameplanning, bringing new ideas to the table, management of the offense, etc.Yeah gotta be hard to have a 1 year test to keep a job and switch the entire offense's terminology.
But on the other hand, why bring in Whipple then?
I agree, but Whipple's playcalling....the actual process of calling the play and the nomenclature could be totally different. Is the offense going to learn his system? Or is Whipple going to be asked to learn the Frost system as far as what concepts are called and how they are relayed to the field?its about gameplanning, bringing new ideas to the table, management of the offense, etc.
Get a FG kicker and you had one of the best red zone offenses in the B1Gits not the offense is a complete disaster, its about fixing the red zone issues
Yeah, the thing that needs to be fixed with this offense is the run game. Outside of when we can get an extra guy in the QB run game, we have been an average to bad running team for three years. That's a bit of the head scratching element to the Whipple hire for me as I would think that we would want to bring someone in with ideas in the running game, rather than the pass game. Wonder if Whipple's name played better with QB targets at all.The offense isn’t going to be overhauled. There’s nothing wrong with it. It’s moved the ball on the best teams in the league but bogged down in the red zone & we had issues with the QB getting thru his reads quickly or just missing guys
Whipple (or whoever the new OC is), will be a QB coach 1st. Fix the QB issues (& kicking issues) & ur red zone issues become not as large
The only concern I have is who is addressing the run game problems
Maybe it’s as simple as landing a 20 touch a game RB. But not sure
Mickey is a god send for that WR roomI agree, but Whipple's playcalling....the actual process of calling the play and the nomenclature could be totally different. Is the offense going to learn his system? Or is Whipple going to be asked to learn the Frost system as far as what concepts are called and how they are relayed to the field?
I honestly don't know, I would think that if you bring in a guy like Whipple and likely pay him $1 Mil you let him use his system, his terminology. Plus with bringing Joseph and Raiola on, they have to learn something new no matter what, they might as well learn Whipple's system.
Who knows maybe his system is simpler. Lord knows Nebraska has had trouble getting good players on the field because apparently they can't grasp things.
Definitely a Catch 22. Frost is on the Hot Seat so can't afford to have an offense that struggles in the early stages of learning something new. But we know our offense isn't working plus will have 2-3 new coaches on offense so either way they will have a learning curve. I'm fine with the hire but some concerns on the application of it. Is Whipple going to be more of a Sounding Board for offensive ideas or Mentor to Frost or are we going to run his offense? Time will tell but when you are 3-9 there really isn't any change that is bad, or could make things worse.Isn’t hiring Whipple pretty much mean Frost has gave up on his offense? I assume Smothers is looking for a new home isn’t he?
Red zone problems weren't offensive problems. They were special teams problems.The offense isn’t going to be overhauled. There’s nothing wrong with it. It’s moved the ball on the best teams in the league but bogged down in the red zone & we had issues with the QB getting thru his reads quickly or just missing guys
Whipple (or whoever the new OC is), will be a QB coach 1st. Fix the QB issues (& kicking issues) & ur red zone issues become not as large
The only concern I have is who is addressing the run game problems
Maybe it’s as simple as landing a 20 touch a game RB. But not sure
I would disagree. The field shrunk dramatically for Martinez in the red zone and his normally slow blinking turned downright sloth-like.Red zone problems weren't offensive problems. They were special teams problems.
I think the facts just say the opposite...I would disagree. The field shrunk dramatically for Martinez in the red zone and his normally slow blinking turned downright sloth-like.
Was that a Martinez issue or a scheme issue? Who knows.
I'm inclined to agree with this. Hell, the Oklahoma game is the perfect example. We went blow for blow with em, losing strictly on the points we lost on field goals and extra points.I think the facts just say the opposite...
Nebraska was #1 in the B1G in conference play in RZ TD rate.
View attachment 6062
You missed 6 RZ FGs. You hit your gimmes and your scoring % goes to top 3 in conference. That doesn't include maybe kicking 2 FGs vs Wiscy and instead of being down 7 you are down 1 late in that game ready to kick another RZ FG.
It is a FG kicker problem not an offense problem.
Again, just looking at the facts.
Our OL is probably worse than his barring any improvements made by Raiola70% completion and 0 interceptions on a 1-11 team is actually kind of hard to do
Good data. I would not have guessed that.I think the facts just say the opposite...
Nebraska was #1 in the B1G in conference play in RZ TD rate.
View attachment 6062
You missed 6 RZ FGs. You hit your gimmes and your scoring % goes to top 3 in conference. That doesn't include maybe kicking 2 FGs vs Wiscy and instead of being down 7 you are down 1 late in that game ready to kick another RZ FG.
It is a FG kicker problem not an offense problem.
Again, just looking at the facts.
Jesus Cockeye 39% and won 10 games. FuckI think the facts just say the opposite...
Nebraska was #1 in the B1G in conference play in RZ TD rate.
View attachment 6062
You missed 6 RZ FGs. You hit your gimmes and your scoring % goes to top 3 in conference. That doesn't include maybe kicking 2 FGs vs Wiscy and instead of being down 7 you are down 1 late in that game ready to kick another RZ FG.
It is a FG kicker problem not an offense problem.
Again, just looking at the facts.
I think it takes either a really good scheme or a really special QB to be really good in the RZ passing the ball. You need to be able to run the ball. We did a lot of QB run inside the 5 to gain a blocker and gap in the running scheme.Good data. I would not have guessed that.
I’m guess I’m just speaking from an observational perspective. We were very solid in the run game, but something was majorly off with our passing attack in the red zone. We were pretty one-dimensional. I think of a few times Martinez missed open guys in the end zone that could have completely flipped games.
Of course I can’t remember the exact games because it all blends together when we lose the same way every single time.