Should Reggie Bush get his Heisman back? | Page 2 | The Platinum Board

Should Reggie Bush get his Heisman back?

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Should Reggie Bush get his Heisman back?

Yes or no

  • Yes

    Votes: 38 70.4%
  • No

    Votes: 16 29.6%

  • Total voters
    54
The definition of "cheat" is "to act unfairly or dishonestly in order to gain an advantage, especially in a game or examination."

As far as I know, Reggie Bush didn't do anything to gain an advantage competitively, so I'm curious what you mean by this. Did he break NCAA rules at the time? Yes. Did he cheat to win his Heisman or gain a competitive advantage on the football field? No. In fact, according to the definition, I don't think he "cheated" at all.
I say it’s cheating and I always have and will.
I’m in a meeting right now so bear with me a bit…

He was getting paid to play. That’s cheating.
What if they didn’t provide him the advantages and another team did off the bat? Would that lure him elsewhere? Probably.

You can say it’s not related to performance, but it is as it relates to team performance. .
 
I say it’s cheating and I always have and will.
I’m in a meeting right now so bear with me a bit…

He was getting paid to play. That’s cheating.
What if they didn’t provide him the advantages and another team did off the bat? Would that lure him elsewhere? Probably.

You can say it’s not related to performance, but it is as it relates to team performance. .
USC and/or boosters aren't who paid him. It was two agents who wanted to represent him when he went pro. So no, USC didn't cheat to get him, they didn't pay him to play for them, and therefore, the money he took had nothing to do with the USC team or his being there. Hence, not cheating.
 
USC and/or boosters aren't who paid him. It was two agents who wanted to represent him when he went pro. So no, USC didn't cheat to get him, they didn't pay him to play for them, and therefore, the money he took had nothing to do with the USC team or his being there. Hence, not cheating.
Shows what I know. Ha.

So call it something else I guess.
He broke rules and lost his heisman because of it. Were the new rules retroactively applied in their wording?

I don’t think I’ll ever think he deserves it back.
 
Back
Top