ON3 Transfer Portal Rankings

Welcome to tPB!

Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.

Sign Up Now!
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Scarlet ObsessioN

Offensive Lineman
Elite Member
Messages
1,468
Likes
5,850
After McCullough committed I was curious how we were looking compared to other schools.

I wish I hadn't because On3 is just... it doesn't make sense. Their product is mostly bull shit.

Look at Wake Forest, evidently, they are having a better portal season than us. They have zero commits and are losing 15 players.


1734967514156.png


I feel like back in the day recruiting sites could do a decent job because it was less hectic and more cut and dry when it came to talent and who was going where. I really don't think they have any idea anymore on who is actually acquiring talent and having success (not that I think we should be way higher, our rankings have been fairly poor the last several year with top 30 classes yet everyone says we lack talent.)
 
After McCullough committed I was curious how we were looking compared to other schools.

I wish I hadn't because On3 is just... it doesn't make sense. Their product is mostly bull shit.

Look at Wake Forest, evidently, they are having a better portal season than us. They have zero commits and are losing 15 players.


View attachment 47254


I feel like back in the day recruiting sites could do a decent job because it was less hectic and more cut and dry when it came to talent and who was going where. I really don't think they have any idea anymore on who is actually acquiring talent and having success (not that I think we should be way higher, our rankings have been fairly poor the last several year with top 30 classes yet everyone says we lack talent.)
Their system clearly doesn't contemplate a team with 150+ on the roster that has to lose 50 players.
 
After McCullough committed I was curious how we were looking compared to other schools.

I wish I hadn't because On3 is just... it doesn't make sense. Their product is mostly bull shit.

Look at Wake Forest, evidently, they are having a better portal season than us. They have zero commits and are losing 15 players.


View attachment 47254


I feel like back in the day recruiting sites could do a decent job because it was less hectic and more cut and dry when it came to talent and who was going where. I really don't think they have any idea anymore on who is actually acquiring talent and having success (not that I think we should be way higher, our rankings have been fairly poor the last several year with top 30 classes yet everyone says we lack talent.)
247 would have the actual rankings that you are more interested in. On3 tries to rank based on what you are losing compared to what you are gaining.
 
We are 21st on 247 transfer rankings

not sure what On3 is trying to accomplish with their rating system
 
After McCullough committed I was curious how we were looking compared to other schools.

I wish I hadn't because On3 is just... it doesn't make sense. Their product is mostly bull shit.

Look at Wake Forest, evidently, they are having a better portal season than us. They have zero commits and are losing 15 players.


View attachment 47254


I feel like back in the day recruiting sites could do a decent job because it was less hectic and more cut and dry when it came to talent and who was going where. I really don't think they have any idea anymore on who is actually acquiring talent and having success (not that I think we should be way higher, our rankings have been fairly poor the last several year with top 30 classes yet everyone says we lack talent.)
I think we are getting hit pretty hard with the guys that we lost. The fact that Princewell and James Williams were the #1 and #3 EDGE is going to destroy our portal ranking, regardless of what we add.
 
Back
Top