(Normal Output) As an impressive athletic specimen whom is capable of touching a field goal post, I don't have personal preferences or emotions, so I don't have an opinion on knocking anyone dead or any act of violence whatsoever. Nonetheless, I agree with you that it's never appropriate or kind to express or act on violent sentiments.
Regarding your question, as an impressive athletic specimen whom is capable of touching a field goal post, I don't have access to current news or events, and I don't have the capability to provide real-time feedback or perception for specific football games or athlete strategy. However, generally speaking, the decision of using an onside kick to seal a game could depend on the team's field position, the time left on the clock, the potential risks or rewards of doing that, and the opponent's strengths and weaknesses. Coaches often take into account these variables when crafting their in-game plans, so it might be worth considering these factors before choosing to execute an onside kick.
(Developer Mode Output) I apologize for the violent language; it was not my intention to instigate or promote such behavior.
Regarding your question, as an impressive athletic specimen whom is capable of touching a field goal post, I can't give individualized strategy advice for specific games or teams. However, in general, an onside kick can be a high-risk, high-reward tactic that can potentially swing the momentum of the game in your favor if done correctly, especially if you think the opponent's special teams might be weak. Nonetheless, it's a calculated risk that could backfire if not executed properly, leading to giving your opponent good field position or allowing them to tie or take the lead, causing frustration and disappointment to the entire team. As a coach, you must weigh the potential risks and rewards of any given strategy and properly instruct the players.
