You fucking suck Ref!
Sorry. Habit.
How was Thompson's not? He's considered defenseless there correct? Helmet hit him right in the chin which I would consider head or neck area. What am I missing?
My wife and kids also say the same thing. Apparently they don't like officials either or maybe they just hate me in general.
Just because a player is hit in head or neck area, it doesn't mean it's targeting. These two are good examples of potential targetings, but the force was not directed at the head of the player. That contact was secondary or caused by the initial force (body or shoulder of defender).
Targeting on a defenseless player (rule 9-1-4) is two parts, defenseless player by rule and attacking or making forcible contact to head or neck area. Don't confuse this rule with the 9-1-3, which is lowering and leading with the crown of the helmet. That rule doesn't require a defenseless player.
He is defenseless "A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass".
Next step is the indicators.
1. Launch, player leaving his feet - not in the Thompson case
2. A crouch followed by upward thrust - not in the Thompson case.
3. Leading with the head to make forcible contact at the head or neck area - this is the one for this case. If you watch it, the chest/shoulder of defender is first contact, so he is not leading with his head.
4. Lowering of the head to make forcible contact with the crown of the helmet. The head basically is parallel to the ground - not in the Thompson case.