More or less confident in team after Cincinnati?

[Kaladin]

I agree with most what you said. I think the containing a mobile QB can be fixed (hopefully).

I even agree with the part I bolded in your post.

But here is also the reality of the day. We should NOT have gone for it on 4th & 2 that ended up giving them a short field. That is a management mistake that has happened the last 2 years. We have the long snapper and punter that can pin teams deep now.

Then because of them deciding to go for it. It showed DR still has trouble finding open receivers in particularly important spots of the game. Similar to ILL and whatever other games last year. There were 2 wide open receivers for that first down he missed. I thought this is where he would take a step forward this year. But we'll see since this was only game 1.

Those 2 decisions ended up letting them back into the game. So, maybe this needed to happen in hindsight to allow the team to mentally figure out how to win a game like this.

I’d rather we go for it and be aggressive in that situation. As a player I’d want that. I think most fans want that and most of the fans that are bitching about that call right now would have bitched about him punting if he had punted it

 

[DrinkItIn]

Less confident after Nebraska’s first Power-5 opening win in 20+ years? That’s hilarious. Raiola was sharp, Johnson ran for 100, Hartzog iced it with a pick. It’s one game, not a season obituary. Jumping to conclusions after Week 1 is about as smart as bragging about “moral victories.”

 

[Samkellers_69]

I’d rather we go for it and be aggressive in that situation. As a player I’d want that. I think most fans want that and most of the fans that are bitching about that call right now would have bitched about him punting if he had punted it

Probably true I can only say based on what I think. I thought they should punt it because it is obviously clear Archie can put the pig skin any place he'd like. And then driving 98 yards for TD was less likely

 

[Ext. 55]

I don't disagree, but you can feel good about the win while still feeling less confident in the team moving forward. I had a great time watching the game last night, been watching some highlight videos today, but still feel less confident in my 9-3 based on what I saw

Don't see how any of that is irrational

I appreciate your perspective. I do.

And, I feel better. Won the game with the points I mentioned when we could have easily done the opposite.

Hell, we had a DB get a crucial holding call on what could have been a game winning drive for our opponents and instead of folding, the team and said DB makes a huge play to win the game.

I see that as a big positive and one that makes me more encouraged.

 

[Mavsker]

Disagree… I actually feel it’s the epitome of a smart, non-knee-jerk, non-emotional answer. It’s realizing it’s game one in an unfamiliar setting with a lot of pressure.

Would I like to see us play better? Of course, I can’t remember a game I’ve watched where I wouldn’t.…but these are the games we found a way to lose in over the last few years. I am reserving judgment till I see how we adjust over the next two games.

I think a rational, non-knee-jerk reaction would be to balance what you expected and what you see in front of you - not to try to minimize the reality (i.e., the game didn't influence my perspective one way or the other even 1%) in order to keep a pre-conceived notion of the team intact.

I don't think humans are even capable of observing something and not having it influence their opinions of that thing.

 

[Kaladin]

Probably true I can only say based on what I think. I thought they should punt it because it is obviously clear Archie can put the pig skin any place he'd like. And then driving 98 yards for TD was less likely

if it were a close game against a big ten team late in the season you probably neee to punt that ball

First game of the year though, on ESPN, in Arrowhead Stafium, your team is juiced, you want to build that killer mentality in your team, you’ve got some momentum, I think you go for that every time

 

[Ext. 55]

You can feel good about winning a close one while also acknowledging that sneaking away with a W when you allowed an opponent with <70 yards of passing to be in a position to win or tie the game in the last minute raises concerns about how good the team really is.

They aren’t mutually exclusive ideas.

Perhaps. I see a team that came off a bad holding call on that drive at a crucial moment come back and execute to perfection and come down with an INT and win the game.

Where, in situations past, they folded.

That gives me a lot of positive vibes for the season.

 

[Mavsker]

Less confident after Nebraska’s first Power-5 opening win in 20+ years? That’s hilarious. Raiola was sharp, Johnson ran for 100, Hartzog iced it with a pick. It’s one game, not a season obituary. Jumping to conclusions after Week 1 is about as smart as bragging about “moral victories.”

How is it "jumping to conclusions" to say you're less confident in the team after watching them play for the first time?

If you're more confident in the team, is that also jumping to a conclusion?

Are we allowed to feel more or less confident after game 2? Game 3?

So dumb lol

 

[Ext. 55]

What makes me less confident is.....we had a pretty clean game, won the turn over battler, held our P4 opponent to 17 pts, had WONDERFUL special teams and STILL only won by 3 points on a last second interception. I've VERY happy with the win, but to play a near perfect game and have it that close makes me feel less confident than I did before the game. I always thought if we cleaned those things up we would win most games by at least a couple of touchdowns.

I do think that false start penalty on the 1 yard line was a huge kick in the nuts in the second quarter. If we score a TD there, I think we are in the driver's seat at that point.

Sure all valid things to look at and understand that we need to clean up.

And we didn’t fold and WON through it all. That says a lot about culture and playing through each play without panic and making a big play (as a team with a winning mentality and culture should) at the end to WIN.

If anyone thinks a game 1 away game versus a P4 opponent doesn’t come with errors, they are irrational.

A team with a ton of new players playing their first offical ball game together gets room for error in my eyes.

What I look for is how did they respond? I saw a team that responded well to every negative, played through that with the right mindset and make the next play.

That is a sign of a winner.

 

[TampaBaySkers]

How is it "jumping to conclusions" to say you're less confident in the team after watching them play for the first time?

If you're more confident in the team, is that also jumping to a conclusion?

Are we allowed to feel more or less confident after game 2? Game 3?

So dumb lol

You throwing a temper tantrum because fans are more confident is fun to watch.

 

[DrinkItIn]

How is it "jumping to conclusions" to say you're less confident in the team after watching them play for the first time?

If you're more confident in the team, is that also jumping to a conclusion?

Are we allowed to feel more or less confident after game 2? Game 3?

So dumb lol

I don’t recall saying I was more confident after the win. Feeling less/more confident after one game isn’t analysis, it’s mood swings. Seasons aren’t decided in Week 1

 

[Ext. 55]

I agree with most what you said. I think the containing a mobile QB can be fixed (hopefully).

I even agree with the part I bolded in your post.

But here is also the reality of the day. We should NOT have gone for it on 4th & 2 that ended up giving them a short field. That is a management mistake that has happened the last 2 years. We have the long snapper and punter that can pin teams deep now.

Then because of them deciding to go for it. It showed DR still has trouble finding open receivers in particularly important spots of the game. Similar to ILL and whatever other games last year. There were 2 wide open receivers for that first down he missed. I thought this is where he would take a step forward this year. But we'll see since this was only game 1.

Those 2 decisions ended up letting them back into the game. So, maybe this needed to happen in hindsight to allow the team to mentally figure out how to win a game like this.

Mistakes and miscues are made in every game. How did they respond? What was their answer? What was their body language?

It’s game number one. I don’t like mistakes. It’s not what happens now, but what happens next?

What is the response? What is the reaction?

I choose to see all of the improvements and especially those that are based in the response.

I see a winner. It may not be playoffs and it’s still a winner after week 1.

I watched ranked teams prior to our game look like hot garbage. Teams that I believe will be good this season.

We weren’t that.

 

[Mavsker]

I don’t recall saying I was more confident after the win. Feeling less/more confident after one game isn’t analysis, it’s mood swings. Seasons aren’t decided in Week 1

I'm using an impersonal you

i.e. "If [someone] is more confident, does that mean they are jumping to conclusions"

 

[Mavsker]

You throwing a temper tantrum because fans are more confident is fun to watch.

I've literally been giving out likes to both sides from the beginning
There are completely valid reasons to be more confident.
I've only been going after people who say it's dumb or irrational to feel more or less confident in a team after watching them for the first time (a really dumb position)

 

[SantaBarbaraSker]

I think a rational, non-knee-jerk reaction would be to balance what you expected and what you see in front of you - not to try to minimize the reality (i.e., the game didn't influence my perspective one way or the other even 1%) in order to keep a pre-conceived notion of the team intact.

I don't think humans are even capable of observing something and not having it influence their opinions of that thing.

Not trying to minimize anything…don’t feel there’s anything to minimize. Was about what I expected.

Ya seem to be taking it a bit personal that some us simply fell a tow question poll is inadequate.
Simple difference of opinion. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


.

 

[Ext. 55]

Do you feel like that’s even possible for Nebraska to achieve this year?

Our team does.

 

[Mavsker]

Not trying to minimize anything…don’t feel there’s anything to minimize. Was about what I expected.

Ya seem to be taking it a bit personal that some us simply fell a tow question poll is inadequate.
Simple difference of opinion. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I just honestly don't understand the position. I personally don't think I could watch a team play for the first time without having it affect my opinion of the team, even just 1%, one way or the other.

The entire thread got derailed by people saying "it's just week one" as though slightly shifting your assessment of the team after watching them play for the first time is overreacting. Maybe I can do this survey again after we've played all the games and it no longer matters so we can be perfectly rational about it 😂

 

[TampaBaySkers]

I've literally been giving out likes to both sides from the beginning
There are completely valid reasons to be more confident.
I've only been going after people who say it's dumb or irrational to feel more or less confident in a team after watching them for the first time (a really dumb position)

Cope harder

 

[Ext. 55]

Of course it’s possible. My advanced ai model has Nebraska going 9-3. Steal just one of those games and Nebraska is in the playoff

 

[EwokRhuler]

More confident. It wasn't pretty, but it was a Power 4 opponent. There's a reason you try to start the season with puff games. Cincinnati has some dawgs and their QB is a baller. They definitely wanted to win that game more. Playing a P4 opponent that smacks you in the mouth and winning is a great start...and Cincy could have won that if they didn't go to the air.

Not saying that we are going to the playoffs, but if the boys step it up and stop being soft, we could have a great season.

Prayers for Bonner btw...