- Messages
- 8,186
- Likes
- 20,146
How quickly everyone forgets about Raiola’s performance against Michigan. Let’s see how the offense does against pedo and Cockeye
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!I don’t see there being one either way. If Lateef plays poorly the next two games, Rhule will ride with Raiola. If Lateef plays well the next two games Rhule will either have to go with Lateef and pay him or let him or Raiola walk. You won’t have both qbs on the roster going forward next year under the last scenario. One will leave.Great game by Lateef. Let’s hope we keep it up next two weeks.
Also I think a QB controversy will be good for Dylan. He needs some competition for the first time in his life.
Which part? The mobility? Accuracy? Sacks? Running ability? 😂😂😂😂 Big time tater post.Raiola more talented than Lateef.
Lateef skill set fits Holgs offense better and Holgs clearly calls a better game based off the tools Lateef possesses as well as leaning on our elite RB more.
Because of that, I do think Lateef gives us a better chance at winning in the Bi1G.
He also out performed Heisman favorite Fernando Mendoza when he played uclaAs long as we can ignore in any analysis of the question the fact UCLA was dead last in sacks, TFLs, and near the bottom in rush defense.
Happy TJ played well but the circumstances were absolutely idyllic for a freshman QB making his first start. Basically never played behind the chains and his playmakers made big plays
Why didn't Indiana get Mendoza an average 3rd down yards to go of like 1.5 yards for every attempt before they had a 2+ score lead? Are they stupid or something?He also out performed Heisman favorite Fernando Mendoza when he played ucla
Thought TJ played awesome and he was so fun to watch. But I’m sure some will call you a hater for pointing that out.As long as we can ignore in any analysis of the question the fact UCLA was dead last in sacks, TFLs, and near the bottom in rush defense.
Happy TJ played well but the circumstances were absolutely idyllic for a freshman QB making his first start. Basically never played behind the chains and his playmakers made big plays
As long as we can ignore in any analysis of the question the fact UCLA was dead last in sacks, TFLs, and near the bottom in rush defense.
Happy TJ played well but the circumstances were absolutely idyllic for a freshman QB making his first start. Basically never played behind the chains and his playmakers made big plays
Close Ls to Ohiost, Mich and USC may go down as Dylan’s best wins at NUHow quickly everyone forgets about Raiola’s performance against Michigan. Let’s see how the offense does against pedo and Cockeye
Keep trying to justify your fat boy sucking broAs long as we can ignore in any analysis of the question the fact UCLA was dead last in sacks, TFLs, and near the bottom in rush defense.
Happy TJ played well but the circumstances were absolutely idyllic for a freshman QB making his first start. Basically never played behind the chains and his playmakers made big plays
The only fat boy I'm concerned with sucking is your dadKeep trying to justify your fat boy sucking bro
You’re going to accidentally suck his dad?The only fat boy I'm concerned with sucking is your dad
2 of his 3 TDs were a Hail Mary and against a soft zone when the game was essentially over. Underwood outplayed him even though the numbers don’t say that.How quickly everyone forgets about Raiola’s performance against Michigan. Let’s see how the offense does against pedo and Cockeye
Close Ls to Ohiost, Mich and USC may go down as Dylan’s best wins at NU
lol he threw for over 300 yards against a very good D and had absolutely no protection. He had a fantastic game2 of his 3 TDs were a Hail Mary and against a soft zone when the game was essentially over. Underwood outplayed him even though the numbers don’t say that.