Welcome to The Platinum Board

We are a Nebraska Husker fan community. Please either login or register for an account

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

NCAA Statistical Leaders (9/15)

Alum-Ni

Quarterback
Stats Guy
Messages
4,899
Likes
10,078
The top ten, the Huskers, the Illini and the bottom-ranked squad.

TOTAL OFFENSE
1. Mississippi - 692.0 ypg
2. Tennessee - 639.3
3. Miami (FL) - 609.3
4. Louisville - 590.5
5. Arkansas - 587.3
6. Central Florida - 570.7
7. Northern Illinois - 547.0
8. Ohio State - 543.5
9. Texas Tech - 538.7
10. Texas - 516.0
50. Nebraska - 421.3
79. Illinois - 378.7
133. Kent State - 201.3

RUSH OFFENSE
1. Army - 390.0 ypg
2. Central Florida - 375.7
3. Tennessee - 336.3
4. Rutgers - 307.0
5. Boise State - 296.0
6. UNLV - 293.3
7. Navy - 280.5
8. South Florida - 268.7
9. Louisville - 263.0
9. Texas A&M - 263.0
57. Nebraska - 171.3
73. Illinois - 153.3
133. Miami (OH) - 32.0

PASS OFFENSE
1. Mississippi - 434.3 ypg
2. Miami (FL) - 405.3
3. Syracuse - 367.5
4. Texas Tech - 358.3
5. TCU - 351.0
6. Texas - 342.7
7. USC - 336.5
8. Oklahoma State - 334.0
9. Colorado - 333.0
10. Wake Forest - 329.3
52. Nebraska - 250.0
73. Illinois - 225.3
133. Air Force - 50.0

SCORING OFFENSE
1. Tennessee - 63.7 ppg
2. Mississippi - 56.0
3. Louisville - 55.5
4. Ohio State - 54.0
5. Miami (FL) - 53.0
6. Indiana - 50.0
7. Alabama - 49.0
8. South Alabama - 48.3
9. Rutgers - 46.5
10. Texas - 46.3
44. Nebraska - 34.0
54. Illinois - 32.7
133. Air Force - 10.3

PASS EFFICIENCY
1. Penn State - 209.67
2. Northern Illinois - 209.24
3. Miami (FL) - 203.43
4. Boston College - 200.19
5. Indiana - 200.08
6. Mississippi - 199.23
7. Texas - 197.28
8. Alabama - 193.98
9. Auburn - 183.68
10. Oregon - 183.51
34. Illinois - 159.74
38. Nebraska - 158.15

133. Air Force - 51.43

COMPLETION PERCENTAGE
1. Oregon - 83.7%
2. Louisiana-Lafayette - 76.7
3. Washington - 76.0
4. Miami (FL) - 75.2
5. Indiana - 74.7
6. Georgia Tech - 74.6
6. Missouri - 74.6
8. Mississippi - 74.5
9. Nebraska - 73.9
10. Clemson - 73.5
31. Illinois - 67.5
133. Air Force - 35.7

TACKLES FOR LOSS ALLOWED (per game)
1. Army - 1.00
1. Navy - 1.00
3. Cockeye State - 2.00
3. Louisiana-Lafayette - 2.00
3. Rutgers - 2.00
3. Texas A&M - 2.00
7. Coastal Carolina - 2.33
7. Liberty - 2.33
9. Bowling Green - 2.50
9. Northern Illinois - 2.50
9. Ohio State - 2.50
9. Syracuse - 2.50
39. Nebraska - 4.00
116. Illinois - 7.33
133. Massachusetts - 12.00

SACKS ALLOWED (per game)
1. Air Force - 0.00
1. Army - 0.00
1. Bowling Green - 0.00
1. Georgia Tech - 0.00
1. Northern Illinois - 0.00
1. New Mexico - 0.00
1. Oklahoma State - 0.00
1. Rutgers - 0.00
9. Coastal Carolina - 0.33
9. Missouri - 0.33
9. Nebraska - 0.33
9. Northwestern - 0.33
9. TCU - 0.33
9. Connecticut - 0.33
67. Illinois - 1.67
132. Massachusetts - 4.67
132. Old Dominion - 4.67

TURNOVERS LOST
1. Georgia - 0
1. Indiana - 0
1. Louisville - 0
1. Ohio State - 0
1. Louisiana-Monroe - 0
6. Illinois - 1
6. (22 teams tied) - 1
29. Nebraska - 2
133. East Carolina - 12

THIRD DOWN CONVERSION PERCENTAGE
1. Arkansas - 67.5%
2. Indiana - 64.5
3. Miami (FL) - 60.6
4. Missouri - 59.6
5. Syracuse - 59.4
6. Rutgers - 57.9
7. Mississippi - 57.6
8. Central Florida - 57.5
9. Army - 57.1
10. Tennessee - 56.8
23. Nebraska - 50.0
73. Illinois - 40.0
133. Kent State - 16.7

FIRST DOWNS
1. Mississippi - 104
2. Arkansas - 96
3. Tennessee - 90
4. Georgia Tech - 89
5. Miami (FL) - 87
6. Central Florida - 86
7. Indiana - 81
8. Missouri - 80
9. Pittsburgh - 79
10. Texas State - 77
12. Nebraska - 74
58. Illinois - 61
133. Louisiana Tech - 28

==================================

TOTAL DEFENSE
1. Ohio State - 138.0 ypg
2. Tennessee - 160.7
3. Indiana - 180.3
4. Missouri - 184.0
5. Minnesota - 186.3
6. Miami (FL) - 188.7
7. Louisville - 198.0
8. Georgia - 202.0
9. Kentucky - 215.0
10. Louisiana-Lafayette - 222.5
25. Nebraska - 255.3
33. Illinois - 274.7
133. Kent State - 570.7

RUSH DEFENSE
1. Mississippi - 33.3 ypg
2. Ohio State - 37.5
3. Indiana - 53.7
4. Tennessee - 55.7
5. Cockeye - 56.3
6. Northwestern - 57.7
7. Arkansas - 61.7
8. Kentucky - 62.0
9. Central Florida - 64.0
10. Stanford - 64.5
16. Nebraska - 70.3
59. Illinois - 123.0
133. Kent State - 288.0

PASS DEFENSE
1. Baylor - 75.7 ypg
2. Georgia - 91.3
3. Ohio State - 100.5
4. Alabama-Birmingham - 102.7
5. Tennessee - 105.0
6. Cockeye State - 110.0
7. Missouri - 110.3
8. Minnesota - 112.0
9. Alabama - 115.7
10. Louisville - 116.0
31. Illinois - 151.7
57. Nebraska - 185.0

133. Middle Tennessee State - 384.0

SCORING DEFENSE
1. Ohio State - 3.0 ppg
1. Mississippi - 3.0
3. Tennessee - 4.3
4. Georgia - 6.0
5. Minnesota - 6.3
5. Texas - 6.3
7. James Madison - 6.5
8. Nebraska - 6.7
9. Army - 7.0
9. Louisville - 7.0
9. Missouri - 7.0
14. Illinois - 8.7
133. Kent State - 49.7

PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE
1. Cockeye State - 72.00
2. Minnesota - 73.98
2. San Jose State - 73.98
4. BYU - 76.27
5. Miami (FL) - 76.74
6. Alabama - 78.92
7. Alabama-Birmingham - 80.75
8. California - 82.83
9. Ohio State - 84.53
10. James Madison - 85.27
11. Illinois - 87.98
30. Nebraska - 102.27

133. Ball State - 191.19

TURNOVERS GAINED
1. California - 10
1. Maryland - 10
1. Oklahoma - 10
1. San Jose State - 10
5. Florida Atlantic - 9
5. Illinois - 9
5. Minnesota - 9
8. South Carolina - 8
8. South Florida - 8
10. Air Force - 7
10. Arizona State - 7
10. East Carolina - 7
10. Fresno State - 7
10. Memphis - 7
26. Nebraska - 5
(multiple teams tied for last with 0)

SACKS (per game)
1. Rice - 4.67
2. Louisville - 4.50
3. Boise State - 4.00
3. Indiana - 4.00
3. Marshall - 4.00
3. Miami (FL) - 4.00
3. Ohio State - 4.00
3. South Carolina - 4.00
3. Texas State - 4.00
10. Michigan State - 3.67
10. Oklahoma - 3.67
10. San Diego State - 3.67
10. Toledo - 3.67
21. Nebraska - 3.00
75. Illinois - 1.67
133. (multiple teams tied with 0)

TACKLES FOR LOSS (per game)
1. East Carolina - 12.0
2. Duke - 11.3
3. Mississippi - 10.0
3. Rice - 10.0
5. Louisville - 9.5
6. Buffalo - 9.3
6. Memphis - 9.3
8. Miami (FL) - 9.0
8. Michigan State - 9.0
8. Old Dominion - 9.0
8. South Florida - 9.0
8. Texas State - 9.0
30. Nebraska - 7.3
116. Illinois - 3.7
133. Massachusetts - 2.0

THIRD DOWN CONVERSION PERCENTAGE DEFENSE
1. Miami (FL) - 14.7%
2. Tennessee - 15.8
3. Alabama - 16.3
4. UNLV - 20.0
5. Utah - 22.2
5. Louisville - 22.2
7. Ohio State - 22.6
8. Mississippi - 22.9
9. South Florida - 23.1
10. Texas - 23.3
46. Nebraska - 32.5
82. Illinois - 38.5
133. Middle Tennessee State - 59.4

FIRST DOWNS ALLOWED
1. Ohio State - 17
2. Louisiana-Lafayette - 24
3. Louisville - 28
3. Tennessee - 28
5. Rutgers - 29
6. Missouri - 30
6. Navy - 30
8. USC - 31
9. Army - 32
9. Kentucky - 32
42. Nebraska - 45
50. Illinois - 46
132. Middle Tennessee State - 85
132. Nevada - 85

================================

NET PUNTING
1. Baylor - 50.75 ypk
2. Texas A&M - 47.60
3. Mississippi State - 47.22
4. Auburn - 46.67
5. Alabama - 46.27
6. USC - 46.25
7. Florida - 46.18
8. Florida State - 45.42
9. Maryland - 45.38
10. Wake Forest - 44.55
80. Illinois - 38.18
107. Nebraska - 36.56

133. Northern Illinois - 30.40

PUNT RETURNS
1. Troy - 43.00 ypr
2. Stanford - 34.00
3. Alabama-Birmingham - 32.67
4. Colorado State - 32.33
5. South Alabama - 32.25
6. Pittsburgh - 29.33
7. Kent State - 29.00
8. Central Michigan - 26.60
9. Texas-El Paso - 23.50
10. Mississippi State - 23.40
40. Illinois - 11.50
79. Nebraska - 7.17

133. Akron - (-12.00)

PUNT RETURN DEFENSE
1. Bowling Green - (-7.00) ypr
2. Ohio State - (-5.00)
3. Memphis - (-3.00)
3. North Texas - (-3.00)
3. TCU - (-3.00)
6. Auburn - (-2.50)
6. Georgia Southern - (-2.50)
8. Arkansas State - (-1.50)
9. Boston College - (-1.00)
9. Cincinnati - (-1.00)
74. Illinois - 7.33
107. Nebraska - 10.75

133. Boise State - 54.50

KICKOFF RETURNS
1. Alabama - 52.00 ypr
2. Oregon - 48.67
3. Bowling Green - 46.00
4. Toledo - 38.50
5. Marshall - 33.50
5. Tennessee - 33.50
7. Colorado - 33.00
8. Tulsa - 32.83
9. Auburn - 31.75
10. Cockeye - 30.50
41. Nebraska - 22.00
58. Illinois - 20.00
133. (multiple teams tied with 0)

KICKOFF RETURN DEFENSE
1. Arizona - 0.00 ypr
1. Louisiana Tech - 0.00
1. North Carolina State - 0.00
4. Hawaii - 3.67
5. Tennessee - 5.00
6. Georgia Southern - 7.00
7. Georgia State - 8.00
7. Texas-San Antonio - 8.00
9. Florida - 9.00
10. Missouri - 10.00
69. Illinois - 18.40
99. Nebraska - 20.33

133. Wyoming - 48.33

TURNOVER MARGIN (per game)
1. Maryland (+3.00)
2. California (+2.67)
2. Illinois (+2.67)
2. Oklahoma (+2.67)
5. Minnesota (+2.33)
5. South Florida (+2.33)
7. Arizona State (+2.00)
7. Florida Atlantic (+2.00)
7. Indiana (+2.00)
7. Memphis (+2.00)
7. Louisiana-Monroe (+2.00)
23. Nebraska (+1.00)
133. Temple (-3.67)

PENALTY YARDS PER GAME
1. Miami (OH) - 12.50 ypg
2. Kent State - 17.33
3. Wisconsin - 17.67
4. Army - 24.50
5. Louisiana-Lafayette - 25.00
6. Boston College - 26.00
7. Stanford - 27.00
8. Cockeye - 28.33
8. Kansas State - 28.33
10. Virginia - 29.67
53. Illinois - 48.67
84 Nebraska - 61.33

133. San Diego State - 116.33

AVERAGE TIME OF POSSESSION
1. Oregon State - 37:09
2. Massachusetts - 36:36
3. Army - 35:51
3. Arizona State - 35:51
5. Missouri - 35:47
6. BYU - 34:30
7. Utah - 34:19
8. Maryland - 34:09
9. Miami (FL) - 34:02
9. Louisiana-Monroe - 34:02
27. Illinois - 32:32
38. Nebraska - 31:55

133. Mississippi State - 21:32
 
Wow, I can’t even remember the last time I looked through this and we were consistently good at stuff. Most years I go into this post, take a deep breath and think, “Well at least we’re top 40 in pass defense and 3rd down defense. That’s something.”
 

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Wide/Narrow view

    You can control a structure that you can use to use your theme wide or narrow.

    Grid view forum list

    You can control the layout of the forum list in a grid or ordinary listing style structure.

    Close sidebar

    You can get rid of the crowded view in the forum by closing the sidebar.

    Fixed sidebar

    You can make it more useful and easier to access by pinning the sidebar.

  • Color combinations cannot be used

    Color combinations are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.

    Color gradient backgrounds
Back