What's New

Welcome to the forum 👋, Visitor

To access the forum content and all our services, you must register or log in to the forum. Becoming a member of the forum is completely free.

Register now Log in
  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

NCAA Statistical Leaders (11/16)

A

Alum-Ni

Quarterback
Stats Guy
Messages
4,776
Likes
9,575
The top ten, the Huskers, the Illini and the bottom-ranked team

TOTAL OFFENSE
1. Central Florida - 619.1 ypg
2. North Texas - 593.6
3. Mississippi - 564.9
4. North Carolina - 563.4
5. Alabama - 555.2
6. Kent State - 549.0
7. Oregon - 538.5
8. BYU - 533.4
9. USC - 527.0
10. Oklahoma - 515.0
84. Nebraska - 370.0
95. Illinois - 354.8
124. Massachusetts - 190.5

RUSH OFFENSE
1. Air Force - 330.0 ypg
2. Army - 303.4
3. San Diego State - 280.3
4. Georgia Southern - 275.8
5. Oregon - 269.0
6. Washington - 267.0
7. Virginia Tech - 262.8
8. Wisconsin - 261.5
9. Appalachian State - 261.4
10. Arizona State - 258.0
27. Illinois - 206.8
37. Nebraska - 193.3
124. Mississippi State - 21.5

PASS OFFENSE
1. Central Florida - 396.9 ypg
2. Nevada - 382.8
3. Alabama - 380.0
4. Florida - 371.7
5. Memphis - 354.7
6. Clemson - 353.6
7. USC - 353.0
8. Mississippi - 352.1
9. Oklahoma - 350.0
10. BYU - 340.5
106. Nebraska - 176.7
111. Illinois - 148.0
124. Army - 53.4

SCORING OFFENSE
1. Western Michigan - 49.5 ppg
2. Alabama - 47.2
3. Wisconsin - 47.0
4. Ohio State - 46.3
5. Oklahoma - 46.1
6. Florida - 45.8
7. Buffalo - 45.5
8. Clemson - 45.4
9. BYU - 45.3
10. Kent State - 44.5
110. Nebraska - 20.0
114. Illinois - 17.0
124. Massachusetts - 5.0

PASS EFFICIENCY
1. Ohio State - 222.38
2. Buffalo - 213.01
3. Western Michigan - 206.25
4. Wisconsin - 201.40
5. Alabama - 200.68
6. BYU - 192.91
7. Mississippi - 191.13
8. Florida - 191.04
9. North Carolina - 182.23
10. Coastal Carolina - 181.80
111. Nebraska - 110.26
116. Illinois - 103.99
124. Bowling Green - 59.14

COMPLETION PERCENTAGE
1. Ohio State - 86.7%
2. Alabama - 76.2
3. Wisconsin - 74.4
4. Mississippi - 73.9
5. BYU - 73.8
6. USC - 71.4
7. Nevada - 70.9
8. Oklahoma - 69.7
9. San Jose State - 68.9
9. Maryland - 68.9
60. Nebraska - 61.6
122. Illinois - 45.1
124. Bowling Green - 28.0

TURNOVERS LOST
1. Western Michigan - 0
1. Washington - 0
3. Kent State - 1
3. Colorado - 1
3. Washington State - 1
3. Central Michigan - 1
3. Stanford - 1
3. Wisconsin - 1
3. Wake Forest - 1
10. Ohio State - 2
10. Ohio - 2
10. Oregon State - 2
10. Toledo - 2
10. Miami (OH) - 2
10. Colorado State - 2
10. Florida International - 2
10. Air Force - 2
10. Buffalo - 2
35. Nebraska - 5
51. Illinois - 7
124. Duke - 25

SACKS ALLOWED (per game)
1. Washington - 0.00
1. Buffalo - 0.00
3. Air Force - 0.33
3. Texas A&M - 0.33
5. Alabama-Birmingham - 0.43
6. Oregon - 0.50
6. Colorado - 0.50
6. Stanford - 0.50
9. Marshall - 0.71
10. Cockeye - 0.75
10. San Jose State - 0.75
42. Nebraska - 1.67
81. Illinois - 2.50
124. Kansas - 5.43

TACKLES FOR LOSS ALLOWED (per game)
1. Washington - 2.00
2. Buffalo - 2.50
3. Western Michigan - 3.00
4. Marshall - 3.29
5. North Texas - 3.40
6. Texas A&M - 3.50
6. Washington State - 3.50
6. Georgia - 3.50
9. Louisiana-Lafayette - 3.63
10. Air Force - 3.67
24. Illinois - 4.50
56. Nebraska - 6.00
124. Kansas - 10.29

THIRD DOWN CONVERSION PERCENTAGE
1. Oregon - 72.7%
2. Texas A&M - 62.0
3. Wisconsin - 59.3
4. UCLA - 58.3
5. Ohio State - 58.1
6. Alabama - 57.4
7. Toledo - 55.6
8. Appalachian State - 53.8
9. Notre Dame - 53.6
10. Marshall - 53.3
97. Illinois - 34.6
109. Nebraska - 31.6
124. Bowling Green - 18.5

RED ZONE OFFENSE
1. UCLA - 100.0%
1. Akron - 100.0
1. Arizona State - 100.0
1. Bowling Green - 100.0
1. Boise State - 100.0
1. Buffalo - 100.0
1. Colorado - 100.0
1. Eastern Michigan - 100.0
1. Washington State - 100.0
1. Western Michigan - 100.0
1. Wisconsin - 100.0
1. Massachusetts - 100.0
1. Michigan State - 100.0
1. New Mexico - 100.0
1. Northern Illinois - 100.0
93. Nebraska - 76.9
124. Illinois - 61.5

====================================

TOTAL DEFENSE
1. Wisconsin - 218.5 ypg
2. San Diego State - 243.5
3. Washington - 252.0
4. Marshall - 259.7
5. West Virginia - 274.0
6. BYU - 284.9
7. Army - 286.6
8. Central Michigan - 294.5
9. Pittsburgh - 296.5
10. Cincinnati - 300.9
84. Nebraska - 436.3
104. Illinois - 465.5
124. Bowling Green - 595.5

RUSH DEFENSE
1. Marshall - 65.3 ypg
2. Pittsburgh - 78.8
3. New Mexico - 81.0
4. Georgia - 82.8
5. Notre Dame - 85.1
6. Wisconsin - 89.0
7. San Diego State - 91.3
8. Northwestern - 91.8
9. Central Michigan - 92.0
10. Georgia Southern - 92.6
87. Illinois - 188.3
97. Nebraska - 202.7
124. Bowling Green - 302.5

PASS DEFENSE
1. Washington - 85.0 ypg
2. Wisconsin - 129.5
3. San Diego State - 152.3
4. West Virginia - 161.5
5. Hawaii - 162.8
6. Western Kentucky - 167.2
7. Oklahoma State - 169.3
8. Kent State - 173.0
9. Liberty - 173.8
10. Boise State - 174.3
61. Nebraska - 233.7
105. Illinois - 277.3
124. New Mexico - 410.3

SCORING DEFENSE
1. Wisconsin - 9.0 ppg
2. Marshall - 10.1
3. Cincinnati - 12.4
4. San Diego State - 12.8
5. Florida Atlantic - 13.0
6. BYU - 13.9
7. Northwestern - 14.0
8. Cockeye - 14.8
9. Army - 15.0
10. San Jose State - 15.3
76. Nebraska - 32.0
88. Illinois - 34.3
124. Bowling Green - 50.0

PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE
1. Washington - 67.25
2. Wisconsin - 83.45
3. Northwestern - 91.17
4. Cincinnati - 91.41
5. Appalachian State - 92.74
6. Cockeye - 100.65
7. Buffalo - 101.42
8. Louisiana-Lafayette - 102.15
9. Hawaii - 102.61
10. San Diego State - 105.41
72. Nebraska - 139.18
119. Illinois - 175.35
124. Northern Illinois - 184.39

TURNOVERS GAINED
1. Central Florida - 19
2. Boston College - 17
2. Syracuse - 17
4. Wake Forest - 16
4. Cincinnati - 16
4. Arkansas - 16
7. Southern Methodist - 15
7. Louisiana-Lafayette - 15
7. Georgia State - 15
7. Texas-San Antonio - 15
22. Illinois - 12
82. Nebraska - 5
(several teams tied for last with zero)

SACKS (per game)
1. Fresno State - 5.00
2. Pittsburgh - 4.75
3. Colorado State - 4.33
4. Florida Atlantic - 3.80
5. Clemson - 3.75
5. Virginia Tech - 3.75
7. Oklahoma - 3.71
8. Wyoming - 3.67
8. Oklahoma State - 3.67
10. Coastal Carolina - 3.57
63. Nebraska - 2.00
63. Illinois - 2.00
(several teams tied for last with zero)

TACKLES FOR LOSS (per game)
1. Pittsburgh - 11.6
2. Colorado State - 10.3
3. Clemson - 9.1
4. San Diego State - 9.0
5. Tulane - 8.7
6. Tulsa - 8.6
7. Miami (FL) - 8.5
7. Western Michigan - 8.5
7. Kent State - 8.5
7. Bowling Green - 8.5
62. Nebraska - 6.0
69. Illinois - 5.8
124. Akron - 1.8

THIRD DOWN CONVERSION PERCENTAGE DEFENSE
1. Northern Illinois - 20.0%
2. Toledo - 20.8
3. Central Michigan - 23.1
4. Oklahoma State - 23.3
5. San Diego State - 23.7
6. Wisconsin - 23.8
7. Notre Dame - 26.0
8. Kent State - 26.9
9. Boise State - 27.3
10. Oklahoma - 28.0
112. Nebraska - 50.0
114. Illinois - 51.0
124. Stanford - 68.0

RED ZONE DEFENSE
1. Wisconsin - 0.0%
2. Florida Atlantic - 54.5
3. Indiana - 55.6
4. Purdue - 64.7
5. Arizona State - 66.7
5. Washington - 66.7
5. San Diego State - 66.7
8. Georgia Southern - 68.0
9. Cincinnati - 68.4
10. Kentucky - 69.2
10. Marshall - 69.2
36. Nebraska - 80.0
72. Illinois - 85.0
(multiple schools tied for last at 100.0%)

===================================

NET PUNTING
1. Cockeye - 46.15 ypk
2. Georgia - 45.83
3. UCLA - 45.67
4. Georgia Tech - 45.00
5. Miami (FL) - 44.67
6. Arizona State - 44.60
7. Nevada - 44.46
8. Miami (OH) - 43.91
9. Florida Atlantic - 43.70
10. LSU - 43.64
20. Illinois - 41.68
109. Nebraska - 34.21
124. Washington - 8.33

PUNT RETURNS
1. Oregon State - 31.00 ypr
2. Washington - 28.00
3. Central Michigan - 24.00
4. Kansas State - 22.07
5. Houston - 20.50
6. LSU - 20.00
7. Rutgers - 17.25
8. North Carolina State - 17.00
9. Kent State - 16.00
9. Penn State - 16.00
23. Illinois - 12.00
62. Nebraska - 7.33
124. Kansas - (-1.00)

PUNT RETURN DEFENSE
1. Cockeye (-4.00) ypr
2. Houston (-2.00)
3. Kent State (-1.00)
4. Miami (OH) (-0.50)
5. Florida International - (-0.20)
6. Toledo - 0.00
6. Buffalo - 0.00
6. Eastern Michigan - 0.00
6. Minnesota - 0.00
6. Ohio - 0.00
6. Oregon - 0.00
6. San Jose State - 0.00
23. Illinois - 2.33
117. Nebraska - 17.60
124. Washington - 60.00

KICKOFF RETURNS
1. LSU - 36.50 ypr
2. Wake Forest - 34.00
3. Georgia - 32.21
4. Air Force - 32.00
5. Bowling Green - 30.67
6. Cockeye State - 29.69
7. Cincinnati - 28.82
8. Florida International - 28.67
9. Texas - 28.33
10. Texas-El Paso - 27.95
86. Illinois - 18.33
106. Nebraska - 16.25
123. UCLA - 9.00

KICKOFF RETURN DEFENSE
1. Missouri - 0.00 ypr
1. Bowling Green - 0.00
1. Penn State - 0.00
4. Massachusetts - 10.50
5. Minnesota - 12.27
6. Ball State - 12.40
7. Arkansas State - 13.06
8. Oregon State - 14.00
9. Nebraska - 14.43
10. BYU - 14.67
34. Illinois - 18.17
124. LSU - 31.40

TURNOVER MARGIN (per game)
1. Wake Forest (+2.14)
2. Washington (+2.00)
2. Buffalo (+2.00)
2. Indiana (+2.00)
2. Colorado (+2.00)
6. Central Florida (+1.57)
7. Wisconsin (+1.50)
7. Central Michigan (+1.50)
7. Western Michigan (+1.50)
10. Illinois (+1.25)
61. Nebraska (0.00)
124. UCLA (-4.00)

PENALTY YARDS PER GAME
1. Wisconsin - 10.00 ypg
2. Rice - 17.50
3. Southern Mississippi - 30.00
4. Coastal Carolina - 32.57
5. Arizona State - 34.00
6. Washington - 35.00
7. Utah State - 36.00
8. Boise State - 36.75
9. Western Kentucky - 36.89
10. BYU - 37.38
83. Nebraska - 61.33
105. Illinois - 73.75
124. Tulsa - 96.20

AVG TIME OF POSSESSION
1. Wisconsin - 41:51
2. Toledo - 38:42
3. Washington - 36:59
4. Minnesota - 35:42
5. Georgia Southern - 35:32
6. Charlotte - 35:08
7. Northern Illinois - 35:02
8. Rice - 34:54
9. San Diego State - 34:10
10. Coastal Carolina - 34:06
100. Nebraska - 27:36
121. Illinois - 24:28
124. UCLA - 20:29
 
Blackshirts_Win_'ships said:
Thought the same thing, but they have played 8 games (3+ TOs a game is still hilarious though). Not a great year to look at raw numbers with the stats, given the differential in games played.
Click to expand...
Exactamumdo. While these things usually sort themselves out by the end of the season, the CFB Playoff Committee is going to have some challenges picking the 4 teams this year, IMO. You'd think they'd go with the best Power 5 teams at the end, but there are some non-P5 teams that are having brilliant seasons (BYU, Cincinnati, etc.). Like everything else in 2020, it's going to be "different".
 
LoudHogRider said:
Exactamumdo. While these things usually sort themselves out by the end of the season, the CFB Playoff Committee is going to have some challenges picking the 4 teams this year, IMO. You'd think they'd go with the best Power 5 teams at the end, but there are some non-P5 teams that are having brilliant seasons (BYU, Cincinnati, etc.). Like everything else in 2020, it's going to be "different".
Click to expand...
I don't expect the outcome to be much different though. They'll find a way to keep Cinci out for sure. I could see them justifying BYU since they're an independent. Less risk.

Thank God we avoided Cinci beating our ass at home. Take the good with the horrible (rest of 2020), right?
 
Blackshirts_Win_'ships said:
I don't expect the outcome to be much different though. They'll find a way to keep Cinci out for sure. I could see them justifying BYU since they're an independent. Less risk.

Thank God we avoided Cinci beating our ass at home. Take the good with the horrible (rest of 2020), right?
Click to expand...
Agree with all of that, including dodging the whoopin' at the hands of the Bearcats.
 
Cincinnati has UCF and Tulsa left. Two pretty good teams. If they dominate them its going to be very difficult to keep them out vs a 1 loss SEC team.

Edit: That's assuming Notre Dame loses. No way they keep Clemson out for losing to ND without Lawrence.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

System sensitive
Light mode
Dark mode

Manage theme options Manage theme colors

  • Wide/Narrow view

    You can control a structure that you can use to use your theme wide or narrow.

    Grid view forum list

    You can control the layout of the forum list in a grid or ordinary listing style structure.

    Picture grid mode

    You can control the structure where you can open/close images in the grid forum list.

    Close sidebar

    You can get rid of the crowded view in the forum by closing the sidebar.

    Fixed sidebar

    You can make it more useful and easier to access by pinning the sidebar.

    Close radius

    You can use the radius at the corners of the blocks according to your taste by closing/opening it.

  • Color combinations cannot be used

    Color combinations are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.

    Backgrounds are not available!

    Background checks are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.

Back