- Messages
- 1,609
- Likes
- 4,220
Hot take: unlimited NIL isn't the biggest problem, unlimited transfers is
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to The Platinum Board. We are a Nebraska Husker news source and fan community.
Sign Up Now!why, specifically, is player freedom of movement a 'problem'?Hot take: unlimited NIL isn't the biggest problem, unlimited transfers is
Type in "big titties" into chat GPT and get back to me.There’s a growing consensus—even among coaches, ADs, and conference officials—that college football isn’t functioning the way it was designed to anymore. “Broken” might be too strong for some, but the system is clearly under massive structural stress. Here’s the clearest way to frame what’s going on:
✅
1. The Player Market Is Totally Unregulated
NIL was intended to let athletes profit from their name, image, and likeness.
In practice, it became:
→ A de facto free-agent salary system with no contract structure
Players can:
Coaches say:
- leave after one year,
- take NIL offers elsewhere,
- negotiate like pros…
…but without multi-year binding contracts, salary caps, or transparency.
This is the largest complaint nationwide.
- “I’m re-recruiting my own roster every day.”
- “Tampering is everywhere.”
- “You can’t build a developmental program anymore.”
2. Unlimited Transfers → No Stability
We now essentially have:
→ One-time transfer rule + waivers + portal windows = near-constant churn
Roster management is chaos:
Many ADs and coaches argue for:
- Losing 20–40 players a year is normal.
- Teams rebuild like NFL free agency, not college development.
- Even star players portal-hop for better NIL.
- Longer transfer windows
- One transfer without penalty, second requires sitting
- Multi-year NIL contracts tied to education
3. Realignment Blew Up Regional Identity
Oregon/Rutgers in the same conference?
UCLA trips to Rutgers mid-season?
Oklahoma vs. SEC East every year?
→ Conferences no longer make geographic, cultural, or academic sense.
Most realignment was driven by:
Fans, players, and coaches are stuck dealing with the schedule consequences.
- TV networks
- Playoff positioning
- Money to stabilize athletic departments
4. The Gap Between “Haves” and “Have-Nots” Is Massive
The arms race is widening fast:
Even Power Five coaches say the sport is becoming:
- SEC and Big Ten are pulling away financially.
- Everyone else is trying to keep up through NIL collectives.
- Mid-majors essentially serve as “feeder systems” for P4 programs.
→ Two or three super-leagues with everyone else hanging on.
5. The Calendar Is Unsustainable
Coaches complain the sport is now:
They argue the job is now 70% roster management, 30% coaching.
- Year-round recruiting
- Portal windows overlapping with bowl prep
- Donors needing constant engagement for NIL money
- Staff burnout at an all-time high
🔥
From a fan perspective:
It’s still entertaining and the on-field product is often great.
From an internal perspective (coaches/ADs):
Most will tell you the system is structurally broken but fixable.
They say it’s unsustainable because:
Which leads to the most common refrain:
- Players function like professionals
- But the system governing them is amateur-era scaffolding
- And schools don't yet have a framework like pro teams
“We need a collective bargaining structure.”
Many in the industry believe the future will be:
- A players’ union or representative body
- Standardized NIL contracts
- Revenue sharing
- True roster rules (transfer limits, tampering enforcement)
⭐
The sport isn’t dying.
But it is absolutely in the middle of its biggest structural identity crisis ever.
Coaches and ADs aren’t imagining problems—there are real governance failures.
The next 2–5 years will determine whether the sport evolves into:
- A semi-pro, stable system (most likely)
or- A chaotic open market with constant turnover (status quo)
If you want, I can break down:
Just tell me which direction you want to go.
- What fixes are being proposed
- What fans actually want vs. what coaches want
- Which schools are best/worst positioned in the new system
- Or how all this affects Nebraska specifically
Because in any other environment there would be contracts?why, specifically, is player freedom of movement a 'problem'?
only thing I see here as an actual 'problem' is loss of regionality and the traditions/history that went away with itThere’s a growing consensus—even among coaches, ADs, and conference officials—that college football isn’t functioning the way it was designed to anymore. “Broken” might be too strong for some, but the system is clearly under massive structural stress. Here’s the clearest way to frame what’s going on:
✅
1. The Player Market Is Totally Unregulated
NIL was intended to let athletes profit from their name, image, and likeness.
In practice, it became:
→ A de facto free-agent salary system with no contract structure
Players can:
Coaches say:
- leave after one year,
- take NIL offers elsewhere,
- negotiate like pros…
…but without multi-year binding contracts, salary caps, or transparency.
This is the largest complaint nationwide.
- “I’m re-recruiting my own roster every day.”
- “Tampering is everywhere.”
- “You can’t build a developmental program anymore.”
2. Unlimited Transfers → No Stability
We now essentially have:
→ One-time transfer rule + waivers + portal windows = near-constant churn
Roster management is chaos:
Many ADs and coaches argue for:
- Losing 20–40 players a year is normal.
- Teams rebuild like NFL free agency, not college development.
- Even star players portal-hop for better NIL.
- Longer transfer windows
- One transfer without penalty, second requires sitting
- Multi-year NIL contracts tied to education
3. Realignment Blew Up Regional Identity
Oregon/Rutgers in the same conference?
UCLA trips to Rutgers mid-season?
Oklahoma vs. SEC East every year?
→ Conferences no longer make geographic, cultural, or academic sense.
Most realignment was driven by:
Fans, players, and coaches are stuck dealing with the schedule consequences.
- TV networks
- Playoff positioning
- Money to stabilize athletic departments
4. The Gap Between “Haves” and “Have-Nots” Is Massive
The arms race is widening fast:
Even Power Five coaches say the sport is becoming:
- SEC and Big Ten are pulling away financially.
- Everyone else is trying to keep up through NIL collectives.
- Mid-majors essentially serve as “feeder systems” for P4 programs.
→ Two or three super-leagues with everyone else hanging on.
5. The Calendar Is Unsustainable
Coaches complain the sport is now:
They argue the job is now 70% roster management, 30% coaching.
- Year-round recruiting
- Portal windows overlapping with bowl prep
- Donors needing constant engagement for NIL money
- Staff burnout at an all-time high
🔥
From a fan perspective:
It’s still entertaining and the on-field product is often great.
From an internal perspective (coaches/ADs):
Most will tell you the system is structurally broken but fixable.
They say it’s unsustainable because:
Which leads to the most common refrain:
- Players function like professionals
- But the system governing them is amateur-era scaffolding
- And schools don't yet have a framework like pro teams
“We need a collective bargaining structure.”
Many in the industry believe the future will be:
- A players’ union or representative body
- Standardized NIL contracts
- Revenue sharing
- True roster rules (transfer limits, tampering enforcement)
⭐
The sport isn’t dying.
But it is absolutely in the middle of its biggest structural identity crisis ever.
Coaches and ADs aren’t imagining problems—there are real governance failures.
The next 2–5 years will determine whether the sport evolves into:
- A semi-pro, stable system (most likely)
or- A chaotic open market with constant turnover (status quo)
If you want, I can break down:
Just tell me which direction you want to go.
- What fixes are being proposed
- What fans actually want vs. what coaches want
- Which schools are best/worst positioned in the new system
- Or how all this affects Nebraska specifically
there will be no contracts until there's collective bargaining via a college football players' unionBecause in any other environment there would be contracts?
I'm all for free market but having to 're-sign' players every year is absurd
Not even just every year. It's week-to-week & in-season too. Gotta be hundreds of players across the country who shut things down part way through a season because they've already determined they're out.Because in any other environment there would be contracts?
I'm all for free market but having to 're-sign' players every year is absurd
First step is to fix the calendar.Lots of discussion as of late about the state of college football. Not necessarily from a fans perspective, (although I agree), but from coaches and AD's throughout the country. What say you?
Type in "big titties" into chat GPT and get back to me.
ChatGPT went woke. It wouldn’t even make an image making fun of Dean because it was hurtfulI can help with lots of things, but I can’t engage with sexually explicit requests like that.
If you meant something else — humor, a meme, a character trait in a story, or you just want to talk about something completely different — let me know what you’re actually looking for and I can help you out.
🙁 🙁 🙁