Welcome to The Platinum Board

We are a Nebraska Husker fan community. Please either login or register for an account

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

He's Not Wrong....SI article on offensive struggles

slattimer

Quarterback
Insider
GIF Master
tPB OG
Messages
4,916
Likes
36,479
Satterfield & Offense

Jeremy Pernell: No Surprise That This Offense Is Struggling​

Initial doubts about a couple of Matt Rhule’s staff hires at Nebraska have been borne out on the playing field

Nebraska sits at 0-2 and finds itself in a position where it needs to win six of its remaining 10 games to reach a bowl game for the first time since the 2016 season. To do that, the Huskers will need to win at least four conference games, something else they haven't done since 2016.

The blame falls squarely on the shoulders of an offense that has lacked cohesion and has failed to demonstrate any kind of identity.

When Matt Rhule put his staff together, I highlighted three coaches who I was skeptical of - at least initially. I've softened my stance a bit on wide receivers coach Garret McGuire. He's got next to nothing to work with outside of Billy Kemp and Marcus Washington. Isaiah Garcia-Castaneda getting hurt and Zavier Betts quitting crippled an already thin room.

I'm going to keep an eye on the development of youngsters like Malachi Coleman and Jaylen Lloyd as the season progresses. That should give us a better glimpse of McGuire's value to the staff. Jaidyn Doss was going to see the field prior to a wrist injury. Can he help once he's fully recovered? Can other true freshmen like Jeremiah Charles or Brice Hunter work their way onto the field this season?


McGuire has done well on the recruiting trail as a first-time assistant. He has commitments in the 2024 class from four-star receivers Jacory Barney Jr., Dae'vonn Hall and Isaiah McMorris. Barney is still being heavily pursued by the hometown Hurricanes and others. The 'Canes were runners-up in his initial commitment and they're working hard to flip him. Nebraska has to keep him in its class.

Another coach I questioned, like most of the Husker fanbase, was Donovan Raiola. Well, once again the O-line is playing awful and unlike the receiver room, they're doing it with a group of guys who have tons of Power Five starting experience.

The only returning lineman who seems to have improved is right tackle Bryce Benhart, and he's gone from terrible to serviceable. Turner Corcoran is still dreadful at tackle. It's gotten so bad that after two years of assuming he would thrive once given the chance to play guard, I'm starting to second guess that presumption. Ethan Piper has been bad at left guard and Nouredin Nouili is giving me "Steve Lattimer" vibes after coming back from a year-long PED suspension. Ben Scott has been Nebraska's best lineman, as expected.

I give credit to Raiola for securing a couple of impressive commitments for the 2024 class, particularly four-stars Preston Taumua and Gibson Pyle. He's also helped position Nebraska as a finalist for Grant Brix, a top 100 recruit out of Cockeye. The Huskers will also host five-star California lineman Brandon Baker on an official visit this weekend. It will be the third visit to Lincoln for the nation's top-ranked offensive tackle, with a planned commitment set to come on his birthday, Sept. 24.

The other coach I was hesitant about was offensive coordinator Marcus Satterfield. When he was hired, I had a coach who is well-connected in the SEC tell me, "Rhule did South Carolina a favor. Beamer didn't want to fire his buddy, but he knew he had the wrong guy running his offense."

Satterfield's offenses in Columbia were bad. I can give him a pass for 2021 because of the situation he dealt with at quarterback, but his unit ranked 72nd in total offense in Year 2. Heck, even after the Gamecocks enjoyed some late-season success against Tennessee and Clemson, there were questions as to whether or not Satterfield was actually calling the plays.

He also didn't exactly coordinate prolific offenses in his three years at Temple - in fact they were horrendous. Under his direction, the Owls ranked 74th (2013), 117th (2014) and 96th (2015) in total offense and were 88th (2013), 97th (2014) and t-60th (2015) in scoring. Yet now he's in Lincoln and is the highest-paid assistant coach in program history, making $1.4 million.

I haven't been impressed by his playcalling and as I stated above, he hasn't developed any sort of an identity on offense, period. Nothing he talked about in the offseason has come to fruition. They certainly aren't the power-running team he spoke of wanting to be. There's no rhyme or reason to the sequence of plays he calls. There's no consistency to the formations or player groupings he employs, which might not be an issue if the offense wasn't so discombobulated all the time.

There doesn't seem to be any sort of big-picture vision with his offense. What I mean by that, is great offenses run plays in the first half with counterpunches designed for the second half. Offenses set up defenses. They feel them out early to see how they'll defend something they want to do and then adjust accordingly. Have the EIGHT turnovers affected that? Probably.

Regardless, I continue to have serious reservations about Nebraska's offensive coordinator. I get that there's a serious dearth of talent on the offensive side of the ball, but they can still demonstrate serious growth - and they'd better.

By the time the season is coming to an end, there needs to be a feeling around the program that the offense will get where they want to be once the staff gets more talent on the roster. There's already an overwhelming confidence in the defense. Satterfield needs to show something.

The best-case scenario for Husker fans is that it truly is due to a lack of playmakers. That it will look different once guys like Daniel Kaelin, Kewan Lacy, Carter Nelson, Dae'vonn Hall, Jacory Barney Jr. and Isaiah McMorris get on campus. That's the hope, at least, or else Matt Rhule might have to make the tough decision that Shane Beamer didn't have to.
 
I don't disagree with the article at all, but it does drive me crazy when journalists say things like this:

There's no rhyme or reason to the sequence of plays he calls.

To me, that's something that nobody outside of the meeting rooms is ever going to fully understand. People just like to say that there's no rhyme or reason to the sequence because it's not working, whereas if it's working it's perfectly thought out and well reasoned.
 
The only thing I've seen consistently from the Offense - Duo and turnovers.

Game 1 we had a ton of QB read and run game....Game 2, pretty much absent besides Q Draw.
Vs colorado they had a nice counter play off jet motion.

It is tough to say the offense has much good when they have this level of turnovers.
 
Vs colorado they had a nice counter play off jet motion.

It is tough to say the offense has much good when they have this level of turnovers.
It was pretty obvious that jet motion was giving them a look they liked vs Colorado's defense. Problem is, when you can't execute the timing and fundamentals of the snap, it doesn't do you much good.
 
I don't disagree with the article at all, but it does drive me crazy when journalists say things like this:



To me, that's something that nobody outside of the meeting rooms is ever going to fully understand. People just like to say that there's no rhyme or reason to the sequence because it's not working, whereas if it's working it's perfectly thought out and well reasoned.
I get that, but I also don't think you need to be a chef to know the difference between good and bad food.

I think there is a fair amount of criticism for play calling and not establishing an identity. I also wish Satterfield would be better at sequential play calling.

It was pretty obvious that jet motion was giving them a look they liked vs Colorado's defense. Problem is, when you can't execute the timing and fundamentals of the snap, it doesn't do you much good.
IIRC, they would jet motion and then run away from the jet most of the time. BC Colorado played a ton of man, they would use the motion to help clear the side of the field, then crack the safety with the remaining WR and make the CB fit in the run game. This was an area that Colorado really struggled in with that crack replace and you really saw it on Sims's big run.

 
I don't disagree with the article at all, but it does drive me crazy when journalists say things like this:



To me, that's something that nobody outside of the meeting rooms is ever going to fully understand. People just like to say that there's no rhyme or reason to the sequence because it's not working, whereas if it's working it's perfectly thought out and well reasoned.
Yeah, you're right on that, they don't have a clue on the sequence or what they're trying to accomplish....and then he goes on to talk about how shitty the OL is and lack of skill talent....makes it pretty hard on a play caller
 
Vs colorado they had a nice counter play off jet motion.

It is tough to say the offense has much good when they have this level of turnovers.

It was pretty obvious that jet motion was giving them a look they liked vs Colorado's defense. Problem is, when you can't execute the timing and fundamentals of the snap, it doesn't do you much good.
They ran a lot of escort with that motion on Duo.

That's the one thing I thought they did well...that and Q draw. Everytime they've tried to run that Hi/Lo pass concept...which is basically a Smash read with a flat defender and a glance, Sims fucks it up. The pick he threw, had his RB sitting over the middle...wide open....
 
I get that, but I also don't think you need to be a chef to know the difference between good and bad food.

I think there is a fair amount of criticism for play calling and not establishing an identity. I also wish Satterfield would be better at sequential play calling.


IIRC, they would jet motion and then run away from the jet most of the time. BC Colorado played a ton of man, they would use the motion to help clear the side of the field, then crack the safety with the remaining WR and make the CB fit in the run game. This was an area that Colorado really struggled in with that crack replace and you really saw it on Sims's big run.


I remember watching Marcus Washington hold up and turn his back on a crack block during the game. He could've absolutely decleated the guy but it would've been called a blindside block and negated a big run.

I saw that and it gave me a little glimmer of hope that our coaches are starting to make our players smarter.

Now we just need Knighton to get through to Ty, or at least get Jason Peter out of his ear.
 
They ran a lot of escort with that motion on Duo.

That's the one thing I thought they did well...that and Q draw. Everytime they've tried to run that Hi/Lo pass concept...which is basically a Smash read with a flat defender and a glance, Sims fucks it up. The pick he threw, had his RB sitting over the middle...wide open....
Did you think the pocket looked clean on that INT? Rewatching it I thought there was some pressure on his blind side but overall it looked pretty good, he just left the pocket for some reason.
 
Did you think the pocket looked clean on that INT? Rewatching it I thought there was some pressure on his blind side but overall it looked pretty good, he just left the pocket for some reason.
There isn't a reason in the world to scramble on that. It's a pretty easy read. Pick your side, man vs zone, if the hook/curl defender drops into the glance window...check that shit down. He might have felt some pressure on the backside, but I don't remember real well. At least if that's the one I'm thinking of.
 
There isn't a reason in the world to scramble on that. It's a pretty easy read. Pick your side, man vs zone, if the hook/curl defender drops into the glance window...check that shit down. He might have felt some pressure on the backside, but I don't remember real well. At least if that's the one I'm thinking of.
Is that fixable, just a guy trying to do too much?

It was the biggest "wtf you gotta be kidding" moment of the game
 
Have really no issue in how Satterfield has called games. He’s gotten the offense in position to score, they just like so shoot themselves in the dick first. He can’t make sims read a D or half on to a football.

Raiola is really the only one I’m mad about, it’s all still just fucking trash. But a new coach probably wouldn’t be any better right now
 
Is that fixable, just a guy trying to do too much?

It was the biggest "wtf you gotta be kidding" moment of the game
You'd hope so. He's got to know the thought process of where to work. I'm sure he knows, but can you execute it.

When they ran it at Baylor, it was really good, I bet they threw that route 7-8 times a game, and almost all of them went to the glance route. It's really good vs match coverage, because you gain leverage on the trap corner and wall defender but can hammer it in there before, the $ gets there. Plus you have the check down that's got an advantage vs the Mike. But you can't wait. Thats the pick he threw vs Minnesota late when the $ jumped it.
 
I'm not ready to ridicule Satterfield quite yet, as it's simply so hard for me to quite get a grasp for how things are going when we just give the ball away so damn easily. Hes had a few plays that he would have looked brilliant on (see: deep shot to Hill) if the players would just execute.
 
I'm not ready to ridicule Satterfield quite yet, as it's simply so hard for me to quite get a grasp for how things are going when we just give the ball away so damn easily. Hes had a few plays that he would have looked brilliant on (see: deep shot to Hill) if the players would just execute.
I'm on the edge with it. I get it...because he's trying to figure out how to effectively move the ball, with a line that isn't very good, a WR corp that isn't very explosive, and the worst part, a turnover prone QB. That sucks...but you've got to figure it out. The one part of that article I agree with a lot is, by the end of the year, we need to see some semblance of a system, this is what we're good at, and we're going to run it a lot. I think part of that is going to be Duo, because they are pretty solid at it.
 
Through two games, Sims really doesn't seem to have the "gamer" gene. His complete lack of composure in crunch-time is pretty striking i.e. red-zone, driving from behind, momentum swing possessions. In those situations he is a terrible decision maker. When he has time in the pocket he's pretty good.
 
the-big-lebowski-youre-not-wrong.gif
 

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Wide/Narrow view

    You can control a structure that you can use to use your theme wide or narrow.

    Grid view forum list

    You can control the layout of the forum list in a grid or ordinary listing style structure.

    Close sidebar

    You can get rid of the crowded view in the forum by closing the sidebar.

    Fixed sidebar

    You can make it more useful and easier to access by pinning the sidebar.

  • Color combinations cannot be used

    Color combinations are not available to you, this area may be restricted by administrators. Please contact the administrator for more information.

    Color gradient backgrounds
Back